With Teaching Focus, High-Poverty Districts Found to Boost Scores

By Bess Keller — April 02, 2003 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Five high-poverty districts have shown the way to greater student learning by systematically focusing on improved teaching, says a new report by one of the nation’s largest education coalitions.

The report, “Beyond Islands of Excellence: What Districts Can Do to Improve Instruction and Achievement in All Schools,” is available from the Learning First Alliance. An executive summary is also available. (Require Adobe’s Acrobat Reader.)

The report from the Learning First Alliance, a permanent partnership of a dozen education groups, says the districts were selected in part because they showed three or more years of improvement in student test scores that crossed subjects, grade levels, and racial and ethnic groups.

The districts are Aldine in Houston; the Chula Vista elementary district near San Diego; Kent County in Maryland; Minneapolis; and Providence, R.I. Ranging in enrollment from 2,800 students to 52,500, they all draw at least 38 percent of their students from poor families.

In introducing the report at a press conference last week, the head of the district superintendents’ group said the research takes educators beyond effective individual schools.

“We’ve seen one school here and one school there overcoming the issues” of concentrated poverty, said Paul D. Houston, the executive director of the American Association of School Administrators, which is a member of the alliance. “But the real issue is how you scale that up [and] make it more general.”

The report, “Beyond Islands of Excellence: What Districts Can Do to Improve Instruction and Achievement in All Schools,” examines the interrelated changes focused on better teaching that the researchers believe led to the districts’ success.

“Our goal is to get the 12 member organizations learning about what happens in these [exemplary] districts,” said Judy Wurtzel, the executive director of the alliance, which includes both national teachers’ unions, the National Association of School Boards, and the National PTA.

The report is particularly timely, the leaders say, because districts are gearing up to meet the student-achievement demands of the federal “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 just as state budget shortfalls are forcing deep cuts in district budgets.

The report suggests what spending might have the biggest payoff in student achievement.

Data Over Instinct

To improve, the districts first acknowledged their students’ lackluster performance and summoned the will to do better, the report says. They honed visions for where they were headed—centered on universally improved student achievement and better teaching—and made those visions part of day-to-day life at schools and in the central district offices.

Several of the districts overhauled their curricula to better match state academic standards and defined at least several measures of student and school progress. They also reconceived leadership and professional development to support the goals they had set.

That often entailed doing away with one-shot workshops and nurturing in-house teaching experts, finding ways to support new teachers, and encouraging educators at every level to use data to guide instruction.

District leaders themselves “made decisions based on data, not on instinct,” the report says, and emphasized collaboration within the district and with community members.

Finally, the districts did not expect quick results, but instead acted for the long haul. In three school systems, the report notes, the superintendents who sparked change served for at least eight years. In four districts, departing superintendents were replaced by those who had worked closely with them.

The Learning First researchers, who collaborated with scholars from the International Centre for Educational Change, based at the University of Toronto’s Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, acknowledged that even the five districts they studied still face serious problems.

For one, “district and school structure limit success,” Ms. Wurtzel said. “The kind of supports educators need aren’t always there.”

For instance, most school schedules do not give teachers time for extensive collaboration.

A second problem, Ms. Wurtzel said, is that the districts have relied heavily on external and short-term funding from state, federal, and foundation grants for their changes. That raises the question of whether the improvements can be sustained, let alone reproduced elsewhere.

Frederick M. Hess, a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington think tank, who reviewed the report before its publication, called the research “a valuable service [because] it highlights some constructive behavior.”

But, he added, important “backdrop” factors are missing from the analysis, particularly the existence of state accountability systems that fostered a sense of urgency and direction.

“This stuff all looks nice on paper after the fact,” he said, referring to the steps to success that the researchers outlined. “But it’s dicey for actual guidance.”

Related Tags:

Commenting has been disabled on effective Sept. 8. Please visit our FAQ section for more details. To get in touch with us visit our contact page, follow us on social media, or submit a Letter to the Editor.


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Teaching Webinar
6 Key Trends in Teaching and Learning
As we enter the third school year affected by the pandemic—and a return to the classroom for many—we come better prepared, but questions remain. How will the last year impact teaching and learning this school
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
School & District Management Webinar
Ensuring Continuity of Learning: How to Prepare for the Next Disruption
Across the country, K-12 schools and districts are, again, considering how to ensure effective continuity of learning in the face of emerging COVID variants, politicized debates, and more. Learn from Alexandria City Public Schools superintendent
Content provided by Class
Teaching Profession Live Online Discussion What Have We Learned From Teachers During the Pandemic?
University of California, Santa Cruz, researcher Lora Bartlett and her colleagues spent months studying how the pandemic affected classroom teachers. We will discuss the takeaways from her research not only for teachers, but also for

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment Spotlight Spotlight on Assessment in 2021
In this Spotlight, review newest assessment scores, see how districts will catch up with their supports for disabled students, plus more.
Assessment 'Nation's Report Card' Has a New Reading Framework, After a Drawn-Out Battle Over Equity
The new framework for the National Assessment of Educational Progress will guide development of the 2026 reading test.
10 min read
results 925693186 02
Assessment Opinion Q&A Collections: Assessment
Scores of educators share commentaries on the use of assessments in schools.
5 min read
Images shows colorful speech bubbles that say "Q," "&," and "A."
Assessment Standardized Tests Could Be in Jeopardy in Wake of Biden Decisions, Experts Say
Has the Biden administration shored up statewide tests this year only to risk undermining long-term public backing for them?
6 min read
Image of a test sheet.