Va. District Leader Meets High-Stakes Goals

By Jeff Archer — December 03, 2003 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

When Deborah Jewell-Sherman signed her contract as the superintendent of the Richmond, Va., public schools last year, it seemed to some observers as though she had just written herself a pink slip.

Under the unusual terms of the deal, she faced the possibility of being fired if she failed to bring about a dramatic increase in the number of schools achieving the highest rating in the state accountability system. And the contract gave her just one year to do so.

“I think there were those who felt there was no way in the world I would meet it, and that they would terminate me with cause,” Ms. Jewell-Sherman recalled recently, adding that colleagues in other districts advised her not to sign the agreement.

As it turns out, what seemed like a risky proposition has given a big shot in the arm to the long-struggling, 25,000-student district in Virginia’s capital city. State test results released last month showed that 23 of Richmond’s 55 schools met Virginia’s standards for being considered “fully accredited"—more than double last year’s figure.

Even amid growing interest in “performance contracts” for superintendents, Ms. Jewell-Sherman’s agreement stands out. While some districts have tied administrators’ bonuses and job evaluations to student performance, national observers were hard-pressed to think of another school system where the superintendent’s job has hinged so explicitly on a specific set of improvement targets.

“I don’t think I would sign on to that kind of a situation,” said Paul D. Houston, the executive director of the American Association of School Administrators, based in Arlington, Va. “There are so many things outside the direct control of a superintendent that don’t come into play. When you don’t have a hand on all the levers that make a difference, you sort of throw your future to the winds.”

No Uncertain Terms

Ms. Jewell-Sherman’s three-year contract called for three things to happen in her first year:

  • At least 20 of the city’s schools would achieve full accreditation, meaning that 70 percent or more of their students received passing scores on state assessments—a goal Ms. Jewell-Sherman exceeded by three schools. Last year, 10 Richmond schools were fully accredited.

  • No more than 12 of the district’s schools would be “accredited with warning,” a state designation that requires poorly performing schools to draft improvement plans. The number actually dropped to nine this fall, down from 23 last year.

  • And at least 70 percent of 3rd graders in 16 elementary schools that had been low-performing would pass the state’s reading test. Although detailed breakdowns by grade level aren’t yet available, preliminary data suggest the district likely hit that mark as well.

Larry Olanrewaju, the chairman of the Richmond school board, said the superintendent would not have been automatically fired if she had fallen short of the goals. The agreement merely gave the board that option.

“It was meant to be something that sent a clear message to her, and to everyone else, that we cannot accept the way things used to be,” Mr. Olanrewaju said. “We wanted progress.”

Ms. Jewell-Sherman, 52, had her own reasons for signing the contract. The board hired her in July 2002 on a 5-3 vote, with one member absent. Although she had served as the district’s associate superintendent for instruction, and as its acting chief, she had never been a superintendent in her own right. Some board members openly questioned whether she was up to the task.

Hoping to prove herself to the board, she also wanted to signal her own confidence in the schools’ ability to improve. Richmond has grappled with high turnover among district leaders in recent years. Violent crime in the city is on the rise, and more than six in 10 students live in poverty. Two years ago, fewer than 10 percent of its schools were fully accredited.

“I felt that we had all been sold short,” Ms. Jewell-Sherman said. “There was not a belief in the system that it could do the job.”

To change that outlook, she’s put in place a strategy called “Charting the Course.” Principals now complete detailed profiles showing where their schools stand in test scores, discipline rates, student and teacher attendance, and community involvement. With the help of experts from the central office, schools then assess and reassess their strengths and weaknesses, adjusting instruction throughout the year.

Rosa S. Atkins, the district’s director of instruction, contends the approach has created a new mind-set in the schools. Educators, she says, now talk less about how students’ family backgrounds affect their performance, and more about how they can improve student learning. It’s a lesson she hopes isn’t lost amid all the attention around the superintendent’s contract.

“I think it’s important that we not focus on ‘We proved them wrong,’ ” Ms. Atkins said. “I think it’s important that we focus on the fact that we have always had the ability to achieve, and now we have found the keys to that success.”

Won Over

While Ms. Jewell-Sherman’s contract remains novel in its specificity, performance clauses are becoming more common. Twenty-nine percent of respondents to a recent Public Agenda poll of schools chiefs said student test scores figured into their reviews.

Now that Richmond’s superintendent has met the objectives spelled out for her first year, Mr. Olanrewaju said he expects the school board to draft a new set of improvement goals with which to judge her.

“Whatever happens, we cannot afford to regress from here on,” he said.

In the meantime, the superintendent has won over some of those who had questioned her leadership. School board Vice Chairman Stephen B. Johnson, who clashed with the superintendent repeatedly, said he now believes she’s the right person for the job.

“I’ve learned that you can’t always judge someone based on first impressions,” Mr. Johnson said. “I’m going to have better relations with her now that I see she can do what needs to be done to turn the system around.”

Related Tags:


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
IT Infrastructure Webinar
A New Era In Connected Learning: Security, Accessibility and Affordability for a Future-Ready Classroom
Learn about Windows 11 SE and Surface Laptop SE. Enable students to unlock learning and develop new skills.
Content provided by Microsoft Surface
Classroom Technology K-12 Essentials Forum Making Technology Work Better in Schools
Join experts for a look at the steps schools are taking (or should take) to improve the use of technology in schools.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Budget & Finance Webinar
The ABCs of ESSER: How to Make the Most of Relief Funds Before They Expire
Join a diverse group of K-12 experts to learn how to leverage federal funds before they expire and improve student learning environments.
Content provided by Johnson Controls

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment Opinion What the Digital SAT Will Mean for Students and Educators
The college-admissions test will be fully digital by 2024. Priscilla Rodriguez from the College Board discusses the change.
6 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Assessment Opinion Searching for Common Ground: What Makes a Good Test?
Rick Hess and USC Dean Pedro Noguera discuss standardized testing—what it’s for, where it’s gone wrong, and how to improve it.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Assessment Spotlight Spotlight on Assessment in 2022
This Spotlight will help you understand how to use assessment data to guide student learning and examine the debate over standardized tests.
Assessment State Test Results Are In. Are They Useless?
While states, districts, and schools pore over data from spring 2021 tests, experts urge caution over how to interpret and use the results.
9 min read
FILE - In this Jan. 17, 2016 file photo, a sign is seen at the entrance to a hall for a college test preparation class in Bethesda, Md. The $380 million test coaching industry is facing competition from free or low-cost alternatives in what their founders hope will make the process of applying to college more equitable. Such innovations are also raising questions about the relevance and the fairness of relying on standardized tests in admissions process.
A sign is posted at the entrance to a hall for a test-preparation class. Assessment experts say educators should use data from spring 2021 tests with caution.
Alex Brandon/AP