Assessment

Testing Aid for Some Students Leads to Scoring Flap in Md.

By Andrew Trotter — October 22, 2003 3 min read

A flap in Maryland over state reading-test scores is highlighting the difficulties of making schools’ accountability under the federal No Child Left Behind Act jibe with the rights of students with disabilities or limited English to accommodations in taking such tests.

At issue is the state’s treatment of the scores for thousands of Maryland 3rd graders who were accommodated on the reading portion of the Maryland Student Assessment—given for the first time last March—by having the test items read to them.

Those pupils’ reading scores, released to school districts early this month, were invalidated by the state because its testing experts said that items covering the decoding of text are meaningless when they are read to students.

The state had likewise invalidated reading scores in similar circumstances on the former state test, the Maryland School Performance Assessment Program.

But instead of throwing out the invalidated scores, as it had in the past, the state assigned those students the lowest possible scores on the reading section of the test and used the results to help determine whether their schools had made “adequate yearly progress” under the No Child Left Behind law.

As a result, schools with large numbers of 3rd graders who had received “verbal reading accommodations” on the test showed lower performance than they would have otherwise.

Officials of the 140,000-student Montgomery County school district in the Washington suburbs complained to the state that the invalidation of 832 students’ scores in the county resulted in some schools’ unfair portrayal as being “in need of improvement” under the law, a label that has significant consequences.

Seven of the 44 county schools that failed to reach their targets for adequate yearly progress would have met those goals if the reading scores for the pupils with verbal accommodations had been discarded instead of being reduced to the lowest possible scores, the officials said.

The state’s method of calculation puts at eight the number of schools in the county that would have met their AYP targets if the students’ scores had been left out, according to Ronald A. Peiffer, the deputy state superintendent.

Statewide, 30 out of 511 schools that did not make their targets for yearly progress might have met those marks if the disputed reading scores had been discarded, he said.

Reporting Problem

Jerry D. Weast, the superintendent of the Montgomery County schools said he became aware of the problem three weeks ago, when the state provided letters with children’s test scores meant for mailing to parents.

In the letters, the reading scores for 3rd graders who had received verbal accommodations showed only asterisks, with notations that parents should call their schools for an explanation.

Mr. Weast said he has withheld the letters “until we try to figure out how best to inform the families” of the 832 children who did not receive reading scores.

The problem is likely to recur because the same test will be administered in March. In addition, the 4th grade version of the test, which will be administered for the first time next spring, also has decoding items that the state will invalidate if they are read to the students, state officials say. After 4th grade, the reading test does not cover decoding, and verbal delivery of items on reading comprehension does not result in invalidation of the scores.

Last week, the Montgomery County school board unanimously passed a resolution asking that the state, in calculating schools’ progress, throw out the reading scores of students who received the verbal accommodations, and that the state provide an appropriate test for those students.

Nancy S. Grasmick

State officials say they recognize the merit in the county’s complaint, but for now they are bound to include the altered scores in AYP calculations because that step is part of the state’s consolidated plan approved by the U.S. Department of Education. The plan assures that at least 95 percent of Maryland’s students are tested.

“We did agree we would count everybody’s scores,” Nancy S. Grasmick the Maryland superintendent of schools, said in an interview last week. Changing that plan would require the federal Education Department’s consent, she said.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Classroom Technology Webinar
Here to Stay – Pandemic Lessons for EdTech in Future Development
What technology is needed in a post pandemic district? Learn how changes in education will impact development of new technologies.
Content provided by AWS
School & District Management Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: Strategies & Tips for Complex Decision-Making
Schools are working through the most disruptive period in the history of modern education, facing a pandemic, economic problems, social justice issues, and rapid technological change all at once. But even after the pandemic ends,
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Education Funding Webinar
From Crisis to Opportunity: How Districts Rebuild to Improve Student Well-Being
K-12 leaders discuss the impact of federal funding, prioritizing holistic student support, and how technology can help.
Content provided by Salesforce.org

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment Opinion The National Assessment Governing Board’s Troubling Gag Order
NAGB's recently released restrictions on how its board members can communicate set a troubling precedent.
3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Whitepaper
INVALSI Addresses Italy’s COVID-19 Learning Loss
Find out how INVALSI worked with TAO to develop a plan of action that can serve as a model for other education leaders grappling with the...
Content provided by TAO by Open Assessment Technologies
Assessment Biden Administration's Level of Tolerance for Cutting Standardized Tests Comes Into Focus
A distinction has grown between states having to make tests available, and districts deciding it's not practical to make students take them.
8 min read
Image of a test sheet.
sengchoy/iStock/Getty
Assessment Opinion Alternatives to Standardized Tests During a Pandemic Year
Three educators suggest alternatives to federally mandated standardized testing during this year undercut by COVID-19.
7 min read
Images shows colorful speech bubbles that say "Q," "&," and "A."
iStock/Getty