Assessment

Online Report Cards for Teacher Programs Draw Heavy Response

By Julie Blair — January 09, 2002 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

More than 7,000 people rushed late last fall to log on to a new Department of Education Web site that is intended to illuminate the quality of the nation’s teacher-preparation programs and their graduates. The heavy first-day response both surprised and pleased federal administrators.

The site, www.title2.org, which was launched Nov. 29, provides report cards on 1,300 public and private colleges that train teachers. The documents offer state-by-state rankings of institutions, passing rates on teacher assessments, and state standards for educators, among other data.

The response “shows that there is interest and concern out there about the quality of our new teachers,” said James J. Noell, the director of quality improvement and strategic planning for the department. “The hits are still relatively high—2,000 a day.”

Creation of the Web site helped fulfill the provisions of a 1998 federal mandate that institutions be held accountable for the quality of their graduates.

Under Title II of the Higher Education Act, all colleges receiving federal aid and the state governments to which they report must detail the results of certification tests given to prospective teachers, institutional curricula, and state regulations.

Putting It Together

In the spring of 2001, colleges and universities were required to submit data on their institutions and students to the states; last fall, the states analyzed that information and formalized a second report card that was submitted to the Education Department.

Federal administrators are now conducting an analysis of the information posted on the Web site and will submit a final report to Congress by April, as required, Mr. Noell said. The report will examine national trends, he said.

Congress required the report cards in response to contentions that teacher-preparation programs are to blame for academic weaknesses in the teaching workforce. (“Teacher Ed. Riled Over Federal Plan,” Aug. 4, 1999.)

In an attempt to ensure the quality of programs and their graduates, the federal legislators required that the following information be placed into report cards compiled by the states:

  • Data on each teacher-preparation program, including the number of students who take state assessments, the number passing, and the ranking of each school in one of four quartiles;
  • The number of educators currently teaching on licensure waivers;
  • Information on alternative routes into the profession and passing rates on certification tests of those who used such routes;
  • Certification and licensure requirements;
  • Procedures for evaluating programs and criteria for identifying and providing help to low- performing schools; and
  • Plans for improving the quality of teaching in each state.

Many who have coordinated state Title II activities say the law has been a catalyst for improving teacher-preparation programs.

The report cards have helped colleges better understand their strengths and weaknesses, said Marjorie L. Blaze, who coordinates Ohio’s Title II efforts.

She cautioned, however, against using report cards to compare states and teacher- preparation programs.

“Each state has their own testing program and sets their own [passing rates],” Ms. Blaze said, “so it isn’t very accurate” to make comparisons.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the January 09, 2002 edition of Education Week as Online Report Cards for Teacher Programs Draw Heavy Response

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
IT Infrastructure & Management Webinar
From Chaos to Clarity: How to Master EdTech Management and Future-Proof Your Evaluation Processes
The road to a thriving educational technology environment is paved with planning, collaboration, and effective evaluation.
Content provided by Instructure
Special Education Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table - Special Education: Proven Interventions for Academic Success
Special education should be a launchpad, not a label. Join the conversation on how schools can better support ALL students.
Special Education K-12 Essentials Forum Innovative Approaches to Special Education
Join this free virtual event to explore innovations in the evolving landscape of special education.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment What the Research Says AI and Other Tech Can Power Better Testing. Can Teachers Use the New Tools?
Assessment experts call for better educator supports for technology use.
3 min read
Illustration of papers and magnifying glass
iStock / Getty Images Plus
Assessment What the Research Says What Teachers Should Know About Integrating Formative Assessment With Instruction
Teachers need to understand how tests fit into their larger instructional practice, experts say.
3 min read
Students with raised hands.
E+ / Getty
Assessment AI May Be Coming for Standardized Testing
An international test may offer clues on how AI can help create better assessments.
4 min read
online test checklist 1610418898 brightspot
champpixs/iStock/Getty
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Whitepaper
Design for Improvement: The Case for a New Accountability System
Assessments in more frequent intervals provide useful feedback on what students actually study. New curriculum-aligned assessments can le...
Content provided by Cognia