Assessment

Ohio Halts K-3 Assessment After Cleveland Teachers Wage Protest

By Linda Jacobson — December 03, 2003 3 min read

Ohio education officials say they will provide teachers with more training on how to administer a primary-grades assessment after the state recently halted the test, at least for this school year.

The test was to be used to diagnose children’s academic abilities and weaknesses in kindergarten through 3rd grade. But the Ohio Department of Education issued a moratorium on the testing after defiant Cleveland teachers said they would refuse to give the assessment.

“We have no problem with trying to catch these kids early and get intervention for them,” said Debbie Tully, the professional-issues coordinator for the Ohio Federation of Teachers, the state’s affiliate of the American Federation of Teachers. “But I kept getting calls from our locals because the test is too cumbersome to give.”

Ms. Tully estimated that it would take roughly 90 minutes of a teacher’s time to give the different sections of the test individually to a pupil, as would have been required.

“Our concern was, logistically, how do you give these tests?” she said.

Plus, hiring substitutes to cover for the teachers would result in a loss of instructional time, she said.

In a Nov. 14 e-mail to district superintendents, state schools Superintendent Susan Tave Zelman said that she had taken the feelings of those teachers into consideration.

“From those concerns, we have concluded that even though we have provided key elements of a diagnostic assessment system, we have not yet developed an efficient system for helping teachers use it,” she wrote. “So, we have determined that it is not productive to require schools to administer the diagnostic assessments this school year.”

She urged district officials, however, to become familiar with the assessment while the moratorium is in effect. The education department, Ms. Zelman wrote, will schedule professional development for teachers on administration of the test through regional meetings, videos, and online training. State officials also will produce a resource manual and a list of guidelines for teachers.

Ohio developed the tests to assess children’s skills in reading, writing, and mathematics in kindergarten through 2nd grade, but only in writing in 3rd grade.

The state legislature mandated the test last year for use in the roughly 300 districts that did not make “adequate yearly progress” under the federal No Child Left Behind Act. The only results that had to be reported to the state were those of a 20-minute readiness test for kindergartners.

Other districts were supposed to conduct diagnostic testing in grades K-3, but they didn’t have to use the test developed by the state.

Still Useful for Some

Even with the moratorium on the state test, all Ohio school districts still have to conduct some kind of diagnostic testing in kindergarten and 1st grade. Districts have to intervene if children are not meeting the state’s standards.

Some districts are continuing to use the state’s assessment because they found it to be “a valuable tool,” J.C. Benton, a spokesman for the education department, said in an interview last week.

Ms. Zelman’s message to the local superintendents also suggested that even if districts didn’t use the assessment, becoming familiar with it would help teachers better align their instruction with the state’s academic standards.

Meanwhile, after meeting with the two Democratic state senators who wrote the legislation mandating the test—C.J. Prentiss and Teresa Fedor—the Ohio Federation of Teachers has formed an advisory committee to help make recommendations on its implementation.

The committee includes teachers, an administrator, a psychologist, and a parent.

While the state education department is not required to listen to the committee’s recommendations, Ms. Tully said the group “should have teeth, as we are going to keep on top of it and make sure that the members we have asked to serve are being heard and their ideas are incorporated into action.”

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Future of Work Webinar
Digital Literacy Strategies to Promote Equity
Our new world has only increased our students’ dependence on technology. This makes digital literacy no longer a “nice to have” but a “need to have.” How do we ensure that every student can navigate
Content provided by Learning.com
Mathematics Online Summit Teaching Math in a Pandemic
Attend this online summit to ask questions about how COVID-19 has affected achievement, instruction, assessment, and engagement in math.
School & District Management Webinar Examining the Evidence: Catching Kids Up at a Distance
As districts, schools, and families navigate a new normal following the abrupt end of in-person schooling this spring, students’ learning opportunities vary enormously across the nation. Access to devices and broadband internet and a secure

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Speech Therapists
Lancaster, PA, US
Lancaster Lebanon IU 13
Elementary Teacher
Madison, Wisconsin
One City Schools

Read Next

Assessment Opinion To Keep Primary Students Learning and Growing, Start With Data
A district’s dedication to gathering and analyzing data provides stability in uncertain times.
Janice Pavelonis
5 min read
Image shows a speech bubble divided into 4 overlapping, connecting parts.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty and Laura Baker/Education Week
Assessment Spotlight Spotlight on Assessment 2021
In this Spotlight, dive into best assessment practices
and more.
Assessment Opinion Testing Students This Spring Would Be a Mistake
High-stakes tests would tell us very little we can't know in other ways, writes a longtime assessment researcher.
Lorrie A. Shepard
5 min read
Illustration of students in virus environment facing wave of test sheets.
Collage by Vanessa Solis/Education Week (Images: iStock/DigitalVision Vectors/Getty)
Assessment Opinion An Open Letter to the NAEP Governing Board
The change under consideration would make the reading test less accurate not more, writes E.D. Hirsch Jr.
E.D. Hirsch Jr.
3 min read
16Hirsch SOC
AscentXmedia/iStock/Getty Images Plus