College & Workforce Readiness

Obama Proposal on Student Loans Draws Fire

By Alyson Klein — April 23, 2013 6 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The Obama administration has found itself at odds with a key voting block—college students and their advocates—as well as many of its Democratic allies in Congress, because of an important, if technical, budget proposal that could have significant implications for college access.

In a move intended to stave off a doubling of interest rates on federally backed Stafford Loans over the summer, the administration is seeking to shift those interest rates from the current predictable, fixed-rate system to a market-based rate at the time of the loan. Right now, interest rates on subsidized Stafford Loans are set at 3.4 percent, but they’re slated to jump to 6.8 percent in July, unless Congress and the administration act.

Cap Off

The shift to a 6.8 percent fixed rate could cost a student with $20,000 in debt—roughly the national average—an additional $12,000 over the life of their loan, according to an analysis by the Institute for College Access and Success, a nonprofit organization in Oakland, Calif.

The administration and some Democrats in Congress have very different ideas about how to head off that potential rate increase. Advocates for students agree that under current interest rates, which are at historic lows—for instance, the rate was 1.73 on April 17—President Barack Obama’s fiscal 2014 budget proposal offers a better deal for borrowers than they’re getting right now.

But the proposal doesn’t place any cap on the interest rate, leaving students open to much more expensive loans if interest rates soar in the future, critics argue.

Just hours after the Obama administration released its budget blueprint April 10, a coalition of student-advocacy groups including the National Campus Leadership Council, U.S. PIRG, Our Time, Rock the Vote, and the Young Invincibles put out a joint statement disparaging the loan plan.

Drawing Interest

The Obama administration’s fiscal 2014 budget proposes big changes for federally-backed student loans.

• Rates on federally-backed student loans would shift from a 3.4 percent fixed rate to a market-based rate.

• These new variable rates would be based on the 10-year Treasury note, plus an additional 0.93 percent for subsidized Stafford Loans, 2.93 percent for unsubsidized Stafford Loans, and 3.93 percent for loans taken out by parents. The rate would be fixed for the life of the loan.

• If Congress does not act on the administration’s proposal—or pass an alternative—rates on student loans will jump to 6.8 percent this summer. That could cost the average borrower an additional $12,000 over the life of the loan.

SOURCES: U.S. Department of Education; Institute for College Access and Success

“Students have never taken out federal student loans without a cap on how high interest can go,” they wrote. “The president stood with us by investing in higher education during his first term, and we’re concerned that his budget does not deliver the same investment this time around.”

Key members of Congress are on their side. U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, the chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, said during an April 16 hearing on college costs that he has “serious concerns” about the proposal.

“Shifting all federal student loans from a fixed rate to an unrestricted market-based rate will increase the vulnerability of middle-class students and families struggling to afford a higher education,” Sen. Harkin said.

However, congressional Republicans—including the top GOP lawmakers in Congress on education issues, Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and Rep. John Kline of Minnesota—are on roughly the same page as the administration. They like the idea of moving to a market-based interest rate. In fact, Sen. Alexander said at an April 17 hearing that he would like to get started on legislation sooner rather than later.

“Today’s students shouldn’t be paying more than they should, and then, in the future taxpayers wouldn’t be subsidizing more than they should,” Sen. Alexander said.

Implications for Access?

Under the president’s proposal, student-loan interest rates would be tied to the prevailing rate of the 10-year Treasury note at the beginning of the academic year in which the loan is taken.

Students would be protected to some degree from a big spike in interest rates in the future, thanks to another provision in the budget request that would expand so-called income-based repayment plans for federally subsidized borrowers. The proposal would ensure that graduates don’t have to spend more than 10 percent of their income on loan repayment, no matter how much they owe in federally backed loans, or where interest rates stood when they borrowed the money.

Expanding income-based repayment plans is a “more effective insurance policy” for borrowers than placing a cap on student- loan interest rates, said Carmel Martin, who at the time was the U.S. Department of Education’s assistant secretary for planning, evaluation, and policy development in an April 10 conference call with reporters. “In order to have a cap, we would have to charge students more in order to hedge against the possibility that rates would go up to unmanageable levels in the future,” she explained.

But Lauren Asher, the president of the Institute for College Access and Success, which works on college-access issues, said that income-based repayment plans are “no substitute” for a cap on student loans.

An interest-rate formula like the one the president is proposing could ultimately hinder college access, Ms. Asher said. According to recent projections by the Congressional Budget Office, interest on the 10-year Treasury note could rise to roughly 5 percent by fiscal 2017.

And under the president’s proposal, the federal government would add an additional percentage for different types of loans, including 0.93 percent for subsidized Stafford Loans, which tend to help low- and moderate-income borrowers and 2.93 percent for unsubsidized Stafford Loans, another type of federally backed loan for students. That means some students could be paying about 8 percent in interest rates in just a few short years, Ms. Asher said.

But others argued that it’s tough to gauge how big a role interest rates play when it comes to college access.

“There’s not much evidence that [college] choices are being made by people acting as human spreadsheets,” said Kevin Carey, the director of the education policy program at the New America Foundation, a think tank in Washington. Student loans are different from, for example, car loans, for which borrowers are typically able to figure out exactly what their monthly payment will be before they make the purchase, he explained.

And, Mr. Carey added, the administration’s plan to pair the market-tethered interest rate with a “very generous” income-based repayment program has “a lot of merit” because the repayment plan “accomplishes the policy goal that subsidized interest rates had accomplished in the past,” namely, keeping loans affordable.

This isn’t the first time that Congress and the administration have had to cope with an interest-rate jump. Student-loan rates were scheduled to double last summer from 3.4 percent to 6.8 percent, and the issue became a part of the presidential campaign when both President Obama and Mitt Romney, the then presumptive Republican nominee, came out in favor of keeping the lower rate.

Congress passed legislation to leave the 3.4 percent rate in place for one year, mostly as part of an election-year stopgap measure.

K-12 Connection

Meanwhile, the president’s budget would also include a slight boost for Pell Grants, which help low-income students attend college. The proposal would increase the maximum Pell award by $140, from $5,645 in award year 2013-14 to $5,785 in award year 2014-15.

The administration would also seek to prod colleges to hold down the cost of tuition, while improving outcomes for students, by creating a $1 billion edition of its Race to the Top franchise, specifically aimed at higher education. The program would reward up to 10 states that keep tuition increases in check while improving student outcomes, such as graduation rates, and experimenting with new ways of delivering content to students.

The competition also would include something for K-12: States would be rewarded for smoothing the transition between high school and college.

A version of this article appeared in the April 24, 2013 edition of Education Week as Obama’s Proposed Fix on Student Loans Ruffles Allies

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
The Future of the Science of Reading
Join us for a discussion on the future of the Science of Reading and how to support every student’s path to literacy.
Content provided by HMH
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
From Classrooms to Careers: How Schools and Districts Can Prepare Students for a Changing Workforce
Real careers start in school. Learn how Alton High built student-centered, job-aligned pathways.
Content provided by TNTP
Mathematics K-12 Essentials Forum Helping Students Succeed in Math

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

College & Workforce Readiness Most Teens—and Girls Especially—Say Finishing College Is Important, Poll Says
A majority of U.S. teenagers—70% of girls and 54% of boys—are prioritizing graduating from college.
3 min read
Ry-n Uyeda runs through a catching drill, Friday, July 11, 2025, in Waianae, Hawaii.
Ry-n Uyeda runs through a catching drill in Waianae, Hawaii. Uyeda hopes to play softball in college. A majority of teens say it's "extremely" or "very" important to them to complete college, despite concerns about rising tuition and student debt, and the politicization of many issues in higher education.
Mengshin Lin/AP
College & Workforce Readiness These High School Graduates Earned a Diploma—and a $74,000 Teaching Contract
This district's 'grow-your-own' program includes an extra incentive: a generous starting salary for graduates who come back to teach.
6 min read
Leonellys Rodriguez, a graduate of University High School in Newark, N.J., and recipient of a conditional teaching job offer from the Newark Public School District, poses with Principal Genique Flournoy-Hamilton on June 24, 2025.
Leonellys Rodriguez, a graduate of University High School in Newark, N.J., and recipient of a conditional teaching job offer from the Newark Public School District, poses with Principal Genique Flournoy-Hamilton on June 24, 2025. The district's grow-your-own, dual-enrollment partnership will bring high-achieving students back to the district as teachers.
Courtesy of Newark Public School District
College & Workforce Readiness AP Students Rate Their Favorite—and Least Favorite—Courses of 2025
Students taking AP exams for college credit can review their scores in July.
3 min read
Illustration of diverse students sitting on a stack of huge textbooks with one holding a pencil and smiling. There is a blue background with ghosted math equations swirling around.
iStock/Getty
College & Workforce Readiness Summer Jobs for Teens Are Now Scarce. Some Schools Are Trying to Change That
From on-campus job fairs to partnerships with local programs, these high schools are finding teens summer work.
5 min read
Hannah Waring, left, a student at Loudoun Valley High School, and Abby McDonough, a student at Liberty University, work in the strawberry stand at Wegmeyer Farms in Hamilton, Va., on May 23, 2017. Waring and McDonough worked at Wegmeyer Farms for the summer. Summer jobs are vanishing as U.S. teens spend more time in school and doing extra curricular activities, and face competition from older workers.
Hannah Waring, left, a student at Loudoun Valley High School, and Abby McDonough, a student at Liberty University, work in the strawberry stand at Wegmeyer Farms in Hamilton, Va., on May 23, 2017. The teen summer employment rate is down this year, but some schools are trying to create opportunities for their students.
Carolyn Kaster/AP