Assessment

Defiant, Wyoming Nixes NCLB Test

By Andrew Ujifusa — August 21, 2012 1 min read

Wyoming officials have eliminated an annual proficiency test for high school juniors, despite being told by federal officials that they should keep administering the accountability exam.

A measure passed by state lawmakers this year requires that a standardized collegeentrance exam take the place of the Proficiency Assessment for Wyoming Students, or PAWS, for juniors.

On Aug. 6, the state board of education said the state should remove the 11th grade PAWS test from its ets contract.

The proficiency test is given in grades 3-8 for accountability purposes under the federal No Child Left Behind Act. In 2011, PAWS was the subject of a $5.1 million settlement the state received from NCS Pearson, a Bloomington, Minn.-based testing company, because of problems with the test’s online platform. (For the 2012-13 school year PAWS, the state switched its testing contract to the Educational Testing Service, based in Princeton, N.J.)

Republican state Rep. Steve Harshman told the Associated Press that the state instead wanted juniors to take the ACT college-entrance exam “because that’s what matters to kids and families.”

However, the state has not gotten permission from the U.S. Department of Education to administer only the ACT. Wyoming has not applied for a No Child Left Behind waiver that would free its schools from having to reach 100 percent proficiency on the PAWS by the end of the 2013-14 school year. Instead, it has asked the department only to temporarily freeze at current levels the annual testing targets schools must hit to make progress under the federal law.

So far, 33 states and the District of Columbia have received waivers. In a July 26 letter to Wyoming schools chief Cindy Hill, the federal education department told state officials that they should still administer PAWS for juniors in the next school year, despite the change to state law.

Paul Williams, the director of assessment for the Wyoming education department, said the state nonetheless planned to submit the change to the U.S. Education Department for a formal review.

Asked about Wyoming’s testing change, federal Education Department spokesman Justin Hamilton would only say: “States can choose to comply with No Child Left Behind, or they can apply for a waiver to get flexibility in exchange for reforms. And we’re happy to work with them in either case.”

A version of this article appeared in the August 22, 2012 edition of Education Week

Events

Jobs The EdWeek Top School Jobs Virtual Career Fair
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Embracing Student Engagement: The Pathway to Post-Pandemic Learning
As schools emerge from remote learning, educators are understandably worried about content and skills that students would otherwise have learned under normal circumstances. This raises the very real possibility that children will face endless hours
Content provided by Newsela
Teaching Live Online Discussion How to Develop Powerful Project-Based Learning
How do you prepare students to be engaged, active, and empowered young adults? Creating a classroom atmosphere that encourages students to pursue critical inquiry and the many skills it requires demands artful planning on the

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment Opinion Grading Has Always Been an Imperfect Exercise. COVID-19 Made It Worse
It’s hard reducing the complexity of each student’s social, emotional, and academic learning to a letter grade. Maybe we’re doing it wrong.
Lory Walker Peroff
4 min read
A student's grades are unknown
Robert Neubecker for Education Week
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Whitepaper
Facing the Future Together: Digital Innovative Solutions
Join us to discuss how digital innovative solutions can enrich the educational experience in the K-12 environment. We’ll share how these ...
Content provided by Pearson
Assessment Opinion What Federally Mandated State Tests Are Good For (And What They Aren’t)
Spring 2021 testing is happening. That can be a good thing—if the goal is about more than school accountability.
Stuart Kahl
5 min read
Two people analyze test data
Visual Generation/iStock/Getty
Assessment Opinion The National Assessment Governing Board’s Troubling Gag Order
NAGB's recently released restrictions on how its board members can communicate set a troubling precedent.
3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty