As They Revamp Grading, Districts Try to Improve Consistency, Prevent Inflation

By Evie Blad — February 29, 2024 10 min read
Close crop of a teacher's hands grading a stack of papers with a red marker.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Ensuring grades are fair and meaningful is not as easy as A, B, C (or D or F).

As they address the lingering affects of the COVID-19 pandemic, districts are struggling to square fairness and transparency in grading with a longstanding problem: consistency. Students with similar mastery of academic concepts often get different grades if they go to different schools in same district—or have different teachers in the same school, administrators fear.

Variations in how teachers approach extra credit work, points for classroom participation, and penalties for late assignments make grades less consistent and less reliable. That’s why more districts have taken on the complicated, sometimes contentious work of untangling the assumptions baked into students’ grades and how those assumptions affect their learning.

In a quest for consistency, they’ve adopted policies that de-emphasize formative assignments, like homework; give students multiple chances to redo work; raise minimum scores from zero to 50, so that grade bands for A’s, B’s, C’s, D’s, and F’s hold equal weight in a student’s cumulative grade; and establish clear rubrics to determine when students have mastered a skill or concept.

“We want to ensure that we’re communicating student progress in an accurate and meaningful way to our students and our families,” said Becca Meyer, director of the assessment department for the Clark County School District in Las Vegas, a school system that adopted several “equity based” grading changes, such as removing behavior factors from the academic portion of grades and scaling down the emphasis of interim classroom work.

These debates about grading are not new. But they’ve been the target of renewed attention—and a fair degree of controversy—as schools navigate concerns about grade inflation and academic recovery.

Districts face strong headwinds, including competing views among researchers, policymakers, and pundits about the most effective policies. Parents, teachers, and students have differing understandings about what grades mean. And, for better or worse, new grading policies can affect educators’ workloads, classroom routines, and teaching methods.

Pulling apart the purpose—and mechanics—of grading

A tricky thing about grades is that they serve so many purposes, and can be shaped by so many factors. In seeking to rethink grading, districts must keep broad questions in mind: What are grades meant to communicate?

Are they inflated by overly lenient approaches? Do some students receive lower grades because of educator biases and circumstances out of students’ control, like a lack of home internet access, that make it difficult to meet homework deadlines? Are grades meant to reflect a cumulative measure of students’ work, or their current grasp of academic concepts?

It’s a process that can uncover a lot of inertia and unintended consequences, grading experts said.

Bar chart showing the equity grading scale that provides a floor of 50, which ensures an equal range for each letter grade of A through F, 
according to Clark County School District.

“Grades should accurately reflect a student’s current understanding of the course content, free from biases,” said Joe Feldman, a former teacher, principal, and educational consultant whose book, Grading for Equity, has influenced districts around the country, including Clark County.

In theory, students with a similar level of content understanding should have similar grades, even if it took one student longer to demonstrate that understanding, he said.

But grades that incorporate points for extra credit, class participation, turning in homework on time, or even showing up to class with needed supplies, distort that reflection, Feldman contends. Students who’ve mastered less content may have higher grades if they are able to comply with those behavioral expectations. And students who take longer to grasp course content at the beginning of the year may see their grades dragged down by lower scores on early assignments, even if they eventually demonstrate a full understanding of all academic concepts.

“Most teachers get very little training in how to grade, so they are forced to replicate how they were graded,” Feldman said. “In doing so, they replicate some of the same unintended consequences.”

Debating shifts in grading policies

Equitable grading practices help refocus grades on what students know and prevent schools from collapsing academic and nonacademic factors together in ways that make final marks less reliable, he said. Then, teachers can focus on building students’ intrinsic motivation by emphasizing how healthy academic habits, like studying or participating in class, help them learn.

The idea of equitable grading has produced a voluble set of critics—and not merely among policy wonks. Some teachers and school board members in districts that have considered or adopted changes contend that they have fueled a lack of motivation among students, leaving them unprepared for the realities of college and work, where deadlines come with real consequences.

Prohibiting penalties for late work and non-zero grading policies “tend to reduce expectations and accountability for students, hamstring teachers’ ability to manage their classrooms and motivate students, and confuse parents and other stakeholders who do not understand what grades have come to signify,” researchers Meredith Coffey and Adam Tyner of the conservative-leaning Thomas B. Fordham Institute wrote in a Feb. 28 brief.

“All of this makes addressing recent learning loss even harder,” they concluded.

Many stakeholders see the incorporation of behavior-related factors in grades as a “desirable feature of grading, not a bug,” they wrote.

The Fordham authors, though, see merit in some popular pillars of equitable grading, like eliminating extra credit assignments and using rigorous grading rubrics to provide clear expectations for students and promote consistency across classrooms and schools.

Supporters of simplifying grading scales and other equity-focused practices counter concerns about excessive leniency by arguing that the new policies can force students to work harder.

“If you throw in things [into grades] like turning it in on time, bringing Kleenex to class, sharpening your pencils in math, students will be motivated—but they will be motivated to get points, not necessarily to learn more,” said Susan Brookhart, an education professor emerita at Duquesne University who has followed grading debates for decades. “And besides that, it’s all external motivation,” rather than an internal desire to learn more and, ultimately, earn a higher grade.

Changing grading systems to encourage consistency

Districts that have adjusted grading policies in recent years include large school systems like Fairfax County, Va., Los Angeles, and San Diego.

Clark County leaders adopted a new grading policy in 2021 that called for reporting “student behavior” separately from class grades, and weighting grades to emphasize students’ mastery of key academic concepts outlined in consistent rubrics.

The 300,000-student district, the fifth largest in the country, started its grade-reform work at the urging of some “forerunner principals” who had tweaked policies in their own schools, said Meyer, the director of the district’s assessment department.

Under the policy, students who don’t turn in work on time or fail an assignment cooperate with teachers to develop a “reassessment plan” that gives them another chance to demonstrate learning.

If students still don’t meet those goals, assignments are marked with an “M” in the gradebook, which is calculated as 50 percent at the elementary level and as 0 percent for secondary students.

Schools use strategies like after-school study hall periods and scheduled reassessment time to help students learn content they may have missed the first time. The strategy stops students from accepting an “F,” and gradually growing less motivated as they fall further behind, Clark County officials said.

The district also works with principals and educators to share best practices.

See Also

Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Student Achievement Opinion Traditional Grading May Not Be as Straightforward as It Seems
Rick Hess, February 26, 2024
9 min read

But the changes haven’t come without challenges. A leader of the Clark County Education Association, the district’s teachers’ union, argued in August 2023 that the policy “artificially inflates” student progress.

Meanwhile, a parent told local news station KTNV that her children’s grades had gone down after the changes because, while they typically did well on homework, they struggled with tests.

A month before she made those statements, the district revised its policy in response to criticism from teachers. Under the changes, schools must set a deadline of five days for students to complete missed assignments, and secondary school students can receive a grade as low as zero on assignments, but they must receive a minimum grade of 50 on quarterly grades.

Changes in grade distribution

Grade distribution patterns change after districts adopt new grading practices, Feldman said. In a 2018 analysis of 24 high school teachers in a suburban district, his consulting organization found that the share of students who received D’s or F’s on end-of-year grades dropped from 11 percent to 9 percent after the equitable grading policy changes took effect.

See Also

Vector illustration of a woman filling out an online form with letter grades
Student Achievement Students' Grades May Not Signal Actual Achievement, Study Cautions
Evie Blad, November 10, 2023
4 min read

Among white students, the percentage earning D’s and F’s remained at 9 percent before and after the change. Among students of color, 19 percent earned D’s and F’s before the change, and 12 percent earned those low grades after. Conversely, rates of A’s stayed relatively stable for white students, but they increased for students of color following the policy revision.

But critics like the researchers at the Fordham Institute say new grading policies lead to further distortion, rather than greater accuracy.

“When grading is stricter [incorporating factors like late penalties], it can help educators identify students who need the most support, academic or otherwise,” they wrote in their recent paper. “That is, regardless of whether students are struggling with content or with timely work submission, lower grades flag for teachers and administrators the students most in need of intervention.”

Researchers have also tied some concerns about pandemic-era grade inflation to ad hoc policies districts adopted to cope with a rocky shift to remote learning. In some cases, districts quickly adopted non-zero policies, rather than comprehensive changes to their grading structures, to address student factors, like family disruptions, that could hinder learning.

A November 2023 analysis of state test scores and grades earned by Washington state students between 2011 to 2022 found that A’s spiked in the spring of 2020, when schools closed. And A’s and B’s correlated with scores in a lower percentile on state tests, meaning they were less predictive of strong performance on the independent assessments, concluded the study, which was published by Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research at the American Institutes for Research.

The sudden jumps in grades followed guidance from the Washington education department in April 2020 that instructed districts not to assign grades of “fail” and “no credit” to students in high school credit-bearing classes, said the CALDER report by Director Dan Goldhaber and Maia Goodman Young, a research assistant at the University of Washington.

See Also

Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty

Feldman said such shifts show the dangers of adopting piecemeal changes without examining broader approaches to student assessment. Policies like Washington’s eliminated factors that could depress students’ grades, but didn’t address factors that can artificially inflate them, leading to an imbalance, he said.

Brookhart, the Duquesne education professor, said administrators who want to update grading policies must be willing to collaborate with educators, seek feedback, and remain committed to new approaches long enough to see them change teaching and learning, even if they face some resistance along with way. That can mean years of planning before any changes are made.

“If the central office just decides ‘this shall be so’ and makes the change without talking with teachers, parents, and students, it often comes across as just one more decree from the central office,” Brookhart said. “Teachers think, ‘just wait a while and it’ll pass,’ and often it does.”

A version of this article appeared in the March 20, 2024 edition of Education Week as As They Revamp Grading, Districts Try to Improve Consistency, Prevent Inflation


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Student Achievement Webinar
How To Tackle The Biggest Hurdles To Effective Tutoring
Learn how districts overcome the three biggest challenges to implementing high-impact tutoring with fidelity: time, talent, and funding.
Content provided by Saga Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Student Well-Being Webinar
Reframing Behavior: Neuroscience-Based Practices for Positive Support
Reframing Behavior helps teachers see the “why” of behavior through a neuroscience lens and provides practices that fit into a school day.
Content provided by Crisis Prevention Institute
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Mathematics Webinar
Math for All: Strategies for Inclusive Instruction and Student Success
Looking for ways to make math matter for all your students? Gain strategies that help them make the connection as well as the grade.
Content provided by NMSI

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment What the Research Says What Teachers Should Know About Integrating Formative Assessment With Instruction
Teachers need to understand how tests fit into their larger instructional practice, experts say.
3 min read
Students with raised hands.
E+ / Getty
Assessment AI May Be Coming for Standardized Testing
An international test may offer clues on how AI can help create better assessments.
4 min read
online test checklist 1610418898 brightspot
Assessment The 5 Burning Questions for Districts on Grading Reforms
As districts rethink grading policies, they consider the purpose of grades and how to make them more reliable measures of learning.
5 min read
Grading reform lead art
Illustration by Laura Baker/Education Week with E+ and iStock/Getty
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Assessment Sponsor
Fewer, Better Assessments: Rethinking Assessments and Reducing Data Fatigue
Imagine a classroom where data isn't just a report card, but a map leading students to their full potential. That's the kind of learning experience we envision at ANet, alongside educators
Content provided by Achievement Network
Superintendent Dr. Kelly Aramaki - Watch how ANet helps educators
Photo provided by Achievement Network