Federal

Thousands of English-Learners Fall Short on Test of Language Skills

By Corey Mitchell — July 17, 2017 6 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A change to how a widely used English-proficiency test is scored has led to thousands of students being retained in English-language-learner classes and created budgeting and staffing challenges for some school districts.

The change has rattled educators in states with an established English-learner student body, such as Nevada; those with fast-growing populations, such as Tennessee; and even states, such as Maine, that have a relatively small percentage of students who don’t yet communicate fluently in English.

Those three states and more than 30 others belong to the WIDA, or the World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment consortium, and use a test it designed to assess students’ English proficiency.

The scoring adjustment to the test known as ACCESS 2.0 raises the bar for English-language proficiency and took effect in the 2016-17 school year. With the change, English-learners must demonstrate more sophisticated language skills in four domains—listening, speaking, reading, and writing—to achieve the same proficiency-level scores.

Student scores in many states dipped under the more demanding standards this past spring, extending the time that many will need to remain in support services, such as English-as-a-second-language classes.

In Nevada, state administrators estimate that only 2 percent, or 1,500, of the state’s 75,000-plus English-learners will move out of all language-development courses this year. In past years, between 12 percent and 14 percent of students moved out.

“We anticipated that there would be a drop,” said Karl Wilson, Nevada’s program supervisor for ELLs. “We were surprised that the drop was so significant.”

Figuring out whether students need that support and when they no longer require it is crucial to the success of English-learners. When moving students out of language-support services—commonly called reclassification—occurs too early, English-learners can find themselves struggling.

If the process happens too late, students may be restricted from taking higher-level courses that would prepare them for college.

The scoring change—rolled out in the spring to reflect the new language demands in the more-rigorous academic standards adopted by states in recent years—is the first for WIDA in more than a decade.

“What’s being asked of students, not just English-learners, is categorically different than it was in the past,” said H. Gary Cook, the director of research for the WIDA consortium, a group of education agencies that share English-language-proficiency standards and assessment for ELLs that are aligned with the Common Core State Standards. “If the education system doesn’t change accordingly, I don’t foresee progress.”

ELL Performance Is Critical

The consternation over the test scores comes as schools brace for another monumental change.

This coming school year, the performance of English-language learners will have a much greater impact on how schools are judged under the federal Every Student Succeeds Act.

It is another signal that the significance of English-learners—who now make up nearly 10 percent of K-12 enrollment—is on the rise as this population grows and the changes in federal law mandate a more precise measurement of how those students are performing in school.

“States are paying a tremendous amount of attention to this issue and really working hard to figure out how to get this … right,” said Scott Norton, the director of strategic initiatives in standards, accountability, and assessment for the Council of Chief State School Officers.

For WIDA-member states, getting it right includes setting the cutoff scores that students earn to transition out of English-learner services. States have the discretion to set the cut scores that students earn to transition out of English-learner services.

Tennessee plans to temporarily adjust its English-learner exit criteria to avoid “unnecessarily” retaining students in ESL classes.

“Almost all of our state’s English-learners would be retained in ESL programming because they didn’t meet our state’s exit criteria,” said Sara Gast, a spokeswoman for the Tennessee education agency.

To set its permanent criteria, the state plans to study the relationship between student scores on the ACCESS 2.0 exams and state tests in other subjects. Maine is among the states that have already lowered their exit criteria in response to the ACCESS cutoff-score changes.

The shock that states are experiencing is similar to the adjustments made when adopting the common-core-aligned assessments known as the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers and Smarter Balanced.

“Moving from one test to another and raising standards … is not really a new thing,” Norton said. “It takes a while for everybody to adjust, both on the instructional side and on the student-expectation side. And it usually causes some concern out in the districts until people adjust.”

Count Ignacio Ruiz among the concerned.

Ruiz, the assistant superintendent for ELLs in the Clark County, Nev., schools, expects the change to be significant for his district’s 61,000 English-learners.

After the 2015-16 school year, roughly 16 percent tested high enough to exit English-support services.

That percentage dropped to less than 8 percent in the latest round of testing. That means about 5,400 fewer students tested out of support services.

A More Accurate Test?

Similar scenarios have played out in districts around the country.

From Baltimore to Boise, Idaho, fewer students have transitioned out of English-support classes. With fewer students moving out of English-language-development classes, educators face the prospect of educating hundreds, if not thousands, more ELLs than district leaders budgeted and planned for.

That’s most likely a result of more states, including WIDA-member districts, leaning almost exclusively on English-language-proficiency exams to determine when students no longer need extra English support.

“While this test is more rigorous, we think in the long run it’s a more accurate test,” said Stacey Roth, Boise’s administrator of student programs. “We want to ensure that our kids truly have reached proficiency.”

But sometimes that’s not even enough to determine when students are ready to move on. Research from the federal Regional Education Laboratory at WestEd has found that middle- and high-school-age English-learners who are deemed proficient still often struggle to grasp academic concepts.

In acknowledgment of that research and other data, ESSA requires states to monitor former English-learners for four years, two years longer than what was previously required.

“It’s not just about the proficiency piece, but that we have the right information to get students to proficiency,” Ruiz said. “We want to make sure that when we say a student is exiting, that will translate to them being able to have success in those high-stakes tests.”

While Ruiz supports the tougher standards, he’s worried about students, including long-term ELLs—those not considered proficient after years in U.S. schools—who may become frustrated at the prospect of another year in support services.

In Boise, educators saw fewer elementary students reclassified as proficient, even those who are clearly bilingual, because their writing skills, like those of almost all children in that age group, are still developing.

Educators and advocates remain worried about other potential pitfalls of relying on a single assessment.

A report written for CCSSO concludes that states should use at least two measures, including observations of how students use language in classroom settings, to determine whether a student no longer needs English-language instruction.

Prior to ESSA, most states had a mishmash of ELL exit procedures, with districts often deciding when the students no longer needed support. With the new law’s aims to make policies consistent, fewer states may rely on teacher input or evaluation—making tests such as ACCESS 2.0 the only way out of English-support classes.

“States really need to pay attention to these students. Many are trying,” said Cook, the WIDA research director. “Ultimately, we rely on our member states to support the decisionmaking with the data.”

A version of this article appeared in the July 19, 2017 edition of Education Week as Thousands of ELLs Fall Short on Test of Language Skills

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
The Future of the Science of Reading
Join us for a discussion on the future of the Science of Reading and how to support every student’s path to literacy.
Content provided by HMH
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
From Classrooms to Careers: How Schools and Districts Can Prepare Students for a Changing Workforce
Real careers start in school. Learn how Alton High built student-centered, job-aligned pathways.
Content provided by TNTP
Mathematics K-12 Essentials Forum Helping Students Succeed in Math

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal No 'Gender Ideology': Ed. Dept.'s New Focus for Mental Health Grants It Yanked
The Trump administration abruptly canceled $1 billion in mental health grants in April that it said reflected Biden-era priorities.
4 min read
Education Secretary Linda McMahon speaks during a Senate Appropriations hearing on June 3, 2025, on Capitol Hill in Washington.
Education Secretary Linda McMahon speaks during a Senate Appropriations hearing on June 3, 2025, on Capitol Hill in Washington. The U.S. Department of Education has revealed new priorities for two mental health grants after it abruptly canceled awards the Biden administration made.
Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP
Federal Trump Admin. Starts Moving CTE to Labor Dept. After Supreme Court Order
The Education Department put arrangements to move some of its programs on hold while court battles over downsizing played out.
4 min read
Students make measurements to wood to add to a tiny home project during their shop class at Carrick High School in Pittsburgh, Pa., on Dec. 13, 2022.
Students make measurements to wood to add to a tiny home project during their shop class at Carrick High School in Pittsburgh, Pa., on Dec. 13, 2022. The Trump administration is shifting management of career and technical education programs to the U.S. Department of Labor now that the Supreme Court have given the go-ahead to proceed with downsizing of the U.S. Department of Education.
Nate Smallwood for Education Week
Federal Hope Shattered for Laid-Off Ed. Dept. Staff After Supreme Court Order
The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration to proceed with 1,400 Education Department layoffs.
6 min read
Supporters hold signs and cheer Education Department employees as they leave after retrieving their personal belongings from the Education Department building in Washington on March 24, 2025.
Supporters hold signs and cheer Education Department employees as they leave after retrieving their personal belongings from the Education Department building in Washington on March 24, 2025. The Supreme Court on July 14, 2025, allowed the Trump administration to proceed with department layoffs that a lower-court judge had put on hold.
Jose Luis Magana/AP
Federal Trump Admin. Says Undocumented Students Can't Attend Head Start, Early College
The administration issued notices saying undocumented immigrants don't qualify for Head Start and some Education Department programs.
7 min read
Children play during aftercare for the Head Start program at Easterseals South Florida, an organization that gets about a third of its funding from the federal government, on Jan. 29, 2025, in Miami.
Children play during aftercare for the Head Start program at Easterseals South Florida, an organization that gets about a third of its funding from the federal government, on Jan. 29, 2025, in Miami. The Trump administration said Thursday that undocumented children are ineligible for Head Start and a number of other federally funded programs that the administration is classifying as similar to welfare benefits.
Rebecca Blackwell/AP