Law & Courts

Religious Charters, LGBTQ+ Books, and More: A Winter Legal Roundup

By Mark Walsh — March 19, 2025 7 min read
People Waiting In Line Before Brass Scale On Blue Background
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

This winter brought a wave of legal battles that could reshape public education.

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear cases on religious charter schools and LGBTQ+ lesson opt-outs, while lower courts weighed in on hot-button issues like parental rights in gender identity policies, desegregation oversight, and teachers’ use of students’ pronouns.

Here’s a look at some education-related court cases from this winter. These cases span from late December through mid-March.

After 50 years, this school district is no longer segregated, court says

A federal appeals court declared that the Tucson, Ariz., school district has reached the point where it’s considered legally desegregated. The district has operated under a court-supervised desegregation plan for nearly 50 years.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, in San Francisco, unanimously upheld a 2022 decision by a federal district judge in Tucson that court supervision was no longer necessary.

Unless a larger panel of the 9th Circuit or the Supreme Court intervenes, the decision will bring an end to nearly a half century of court supervision for the 40,000-student district, which in 2023-24 had an enrollment that was 62 percent Hispanic/Latino, 18 percent white, 10 percent Black, 4 percent Native American, 2 percent Asian/Pacific Islander, and 4 percent multiracial.

Can parents opt kids out of reading LGBTQ+ books? The Supreme Court will decide

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal of parents who object on religious grounds to a Maryland school district’s policy of preventing them from opting their children out of LGBTQ+ inclusive “storybooks” used in elementary English/language arts classes.

Lower courts had refused to block the policy of the 160,000-student Montgomery County school district, and the parents’ case has become a rallying point among groups fighting sexual orientation- and gender identity-inclusive school policies.

A federal appeals court’s ruling “that parents essentially surrender their right to direct the religious upbringing of their children by sending them to public schools … contradicts centuries of our history and traditions,” says the appeal, filed by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty on behalf of a group of Christian and Muslim parents who objected to the books.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration’s filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the parental opt-out case, signed by Acting U.S. Solicitor General Sarah M. Harris. She argues that the religious parents who object to the LGBTQ+ “storybooks” used as curricular resources in the 160,000-student Montgomery County, Md., school system have a free exercise right to keep their children from such lessons.

Legal fights highlight clashes over transgender students’ pronouns in schools

The rollback of protections for transgender students and fresh legal developments over whether teachers can refuse to use students’ chosen names and pronouns on religious grounds have thrust the fight over transgender rights in schools into a new era.

The Trump administration has removed Biden-era guidance supporting transgender students and the U.S. Supreme Court will take up a case about whether parents may raise religious objections to LGBTQ+ lessons in public schools.

Nnow, a related issue that has been percolating for years—whether public school teachers may refuse to use transgender students’ names and pronouns that don’t align with their sex at birth—is getting fresh judicial scrutiny.

Are religious charter schools legal? The Supreme Court will decide soon

The U.S. Supreme Court will take up a potentially momentous case about religious charter schools, involving issues that could radically alter the character of American education, both in terms of school choice and state funding of public education.

The court on Jan. 24 granted review of two related appeals stemming from the effort to establish a state-funded Catholic virtual charter school in Oklahoma. That state’s supreme court last year ruled that the proposed St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School—which would be sponsored and controlled by the Catholic Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and Diocese of Tulsa but would receive state per-pupil charter school funding—would violate both the state and federal constitutions.

The U.S. Supreme Court set briefing deadlines that indicate the case will be scheduled for arguments in late April, with a decision expected by late June or early July.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration filed a friend-of-the-court brief on March 12 by Acting U.S. Solicitor General Sarah M. Harris arguing that the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s ruling wrongly excluded a religious-based charter school from the state’s publicly funded charter program.

Parents lose appeal over school’s gender identity notification policy

A federal appeals court has rejected a parental-rights-based objection to a Massachusetts school district’s policy of allowing students to determine whether their parents should be notified about gender transitions and their choice of new names and pronouns.

The policy “plausibly creates a space for students to express their identity without worrying about parental backlash,” said a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit, in Boston. “By cultivating an environment where students may feel safe in expressing their gender identity, the protocol endeavors to remove psychological barriers for transgender students and equalizes educational opportunities.”

The Feb. 18 decision in Foote v. Ludlow School Committee comes amid a conservative-led backlash to school policies supporting transgender students, including President Donald Trump’s recent executive orders declaring that there are only two sexes and instructing his administration to develop policies to prohibit public schools from assisting gender transitions and to bar transgender students from girls’ sports. The U.S. Supreme Court, with a six-justice conservative majority, has signaled a growing interest in transgender issues in education.

Schools may get relief from overcharges after Supreme Court ruling on E-rate

The federal E-rate program that funds internet connections in education is subject to a major anti-fraud statute, potentially bolstering schools that have been allegedly overcharged by telecommunications companies, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Feb. 21.

In its unanimous decision in Wisconsin Bell Inc. v. United States ex rel. Heath, the court rejected arguments by an AT&T Corp. subsidiary that the $4 billion program is entirely privately funded through the payments from telecommunications companies to a private administrator and thus not subject to the False Claims Act, a Civil War-era law that allows private parties to help root out fraud in federal programs.

Supreme Court won’t take up case on schools’ bias-response policies

Over the dissents of two justices, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to take up a case about whether educational institutions’ bias-reporting policies targeting hateful or derogatory speech have a chilling effect on students.

The case involved Indiana University’s bias-response teams. But one conservative advocacy group told the court that such policies and teams also “pervade K-12 schools,” which “are always eager to mimic their higher education comrades.”

Parents lose appeal in gender case Trump called ‘child abuse’

A federal appeals court has ruled against two Florida parents who allege a school district aided their child’s “secret” gender transition in a case highlighted by President Donald Trump in his address to Congress last week.

A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, in Atlanta, ruled 2-1 on March 12 that January and Jeffrey Littlejohn could not prevail on their parental-rights claim under the 14th Amendment’s due-process clause because school officials’ actions did not “shock the conscience.”

The story of the Littlejohns and their child, who was assigned female at birth and sought to transition at age 13 in 2020 at their Tallahassee, Fla., middle school, has been a conservative cause for years, and was even cited by Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in his successful effort to enact a law limiting what schools could teach and speak about sexual orientation and gender identity.

On March 6, January Littlejohn was in the VIP guest gallery of the House sitting near first lady Melania Trump when President Trump mentioned the family in his joint address.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
Reflections on Evidence-Based Grading Practices: What We Learned for Next Year
Get real insights on evidence-based grading from K-12 leaders.
Content provided by Otus
Artificial Intelligence K-12 Essentials Forum How AI Use Is Expanding in K-12 Schools
Join this free virtual event to explore how AI technology is—and is not—improving K-12 teaching and learning.
Mathematics Webinar How to Build Students’ Confidence in Math
Learn practical tips to build confident mathematicians in our webinar.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Another Court Lets the Trump Admin. Keep Teacher-Training Grants Frozen
A federal appeals court overturned a lower court's order that had temporarily restored millions of dollars in terminated grant funds.
4 min read
Young Female Teacher Giving a Lecture During an Adult Education Course in School, Having a Conversation with a Older Female with Laptop. Diverse Mature Students Doing Textbook Exercises in Classroom
iStock/Getty
Law & Courts Supreme Court Allows Trump Admin. to End Teacher-Prep Grants
The high court, over three justices' dissent, granted the administration's request to remove a lower court's block on ending the grants.
5 min read
Erin Huff, a kindergarten teacher at Waverly Elementary School, works with, from left to right, Ava Turner, a 2nd grader, Benton Ryan, 1st grade, and 3rd grader Haven Green, on estimating measurements using mini marshmallows in Waverly, Ill., on Dec. 18, 2019. Huff, a 24-year-old teacher in her third year, says relatively low pay, stress and workload often discourage young people from pursuing teaching degrees, leading to a current shortage of classroom teachers in Illinois. A nonprofit teacher-training program is using a $750,000 addition to the state budget to speed up certification to address a rampant teacher shortage.
Erin Huff, a 24-year-old kindergarten teacher at Waverly Elementary in Illinois, pictured here on Dec. 18, 2019, says low pay, high stress, and heavy workloads often discourage young people from entering teacher preparation programs. The U.S. Supreme Court on April 4, 2025, allowed the Trump administration to immediately terminate two federal teacher-preparation grant programs.
John O'Connor/AP
Law & Courts Groups Sue Over Trump's Cuts to Education Department Research Arm
This suit seeks the restoration of Institute of Education Sciences staff and contracts abruptly canceled by the Trump administration.
3 min read
Supporters gather outside the U.S. Department of Education in Washington to applaud Education Department employees as they depart their offices for the final time on Friday, March 28, 2025. The rally brought together education supporters, students, parents, and former employees to honor the departing staff as they arrived in 30-minute intervals to collect their belongings.
Supporters gather outside the U.S. Department of Education in Washington to applaud Education Department employees as they depart their offices for the final time on Friday, March 28, 2025. Two organizations representing researchers are suing the department in an attempt to restore the agency's data and research arm, the Institute of Education Sciences.
Moriah Ratner for Education Week
Law & Courts Supreme Court Appears Unlikely to Strike Down School E-Rate Program
The Supreme Court seems unlikely to strike down the E-rate program, though some justices questioned its funding structure and oversight.
5 min read
The Supreme Court in Washington, June 30, 2024.
The U.S. Supreme Court considers a major challenge to the E-rate program for school internet connections on March 26.
Susan Walsh/AP