Education Funding

Race to Top’s Live Performances: How Key Were They?

March 29, 2010 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Next week, when the Education Department posts videos of the Race to the Top finalists’ appearances before a panel of reviewers, we’ll get to judge for ourselves which states came with tight, well-rehearsed pitches and which states fumbled, or may have just flat-out bombed.

But while we wait for those sure-to-be scintillating performances to go online, we can learn quite a bit about how each finalist did by comparing how many points they had going into the 90-minute presentations with how many points they had as their final score.

For two finalists&mdash New York and Ohio&mdash it’s an embarrassing outcome.

Both states lost points after making their live presentations: New York dropped by 2.6 points to finish in 15th place, and Ohio lost 4.8 points to end in 10th place. Going into the presentations, Ohio was tied with Illinois for fourth place with 423.4 points. What went wrong, Ohio?

It looks like the judges had a hard time squaring Ohio’s reform plans on paper with the political and logistical challenges that became clear during the state delegation’s interview. For example, one judge wrote that “professional union participation is presently only contemplated” in some school districts and that formal participation would have to be negotiated. That, said the reviewer, could negatively affect statewide implementation and impact.

Among the judges’ comments on New York’s presentation was one that said the state’s Race to the Top team failed to provide “enough explanation” as to how its department of education would ensure that the reforms it was proposing would be adopted on a wide-scale basis. And the judges docked New York for its team’s response to a question about the state’s cap on charters, which as the judge put it, “was not convincing enough to allay fears, that, as a state, NY lacks the collective will to make critical changes to existing laws that act as impediments to substantive reform.”

Delaware, which, along with Tennessee, won round one of the competition, must have knocked it out of the park with its presentation. Already in a strong second place position with 438.4 points as it headed into the final presentation, Delaware’s final score rose a whopping 16.2 points, which propelled it to a first place finish over Tennessee with 454.6 points. Tennessee only gained 0.8 points after its presentation to end with a final score of 444.2.

Jack Markell, Delaware’s governor, said in a conference call with reporters that the state’s Race to the Top delegation, which included him, rehearsed for seven straight days for several hours each day. He gave huge props to Diane Donohue, the president of the Delaware State Education Association, for her role on the team. She presented the state’s teacher effectiveness plan, which clearly made an impression on the judges.

In comments about the state’s presentation, one wrote that Delaware’s team “strongly conveyed the 100 percent commitment and buy-in from teachers and the teachers’ union.”

Related Tags:

A version of this news article first appeared in the State EdWatch blog.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Personalized Learning Webinar
Differentiation That Delivers: Proven Practices From High-Growth Districts
Make every minute count. Proven strategies from educators and leaders driving real student growth. Save your seat!
Content provided by i-Ready, Curriculum Associates
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
From Exposure to Experience: Designing Accessible Work-Based Learning
Learn how schools can create meaningful experiences that help every student build skills, connections, and a clearer path to their future.
Content provided by Project Lead The Way
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
A Tale of Two School Districts: Forecasting Enrollment
Forecasting enrollment is hard. Here’s how two different districts are navigating times of change with data that considers the whole picture.
Content provided by Zonda Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Funding Opinion An Expert Explains How the Federal Scholarship Tax Credit Will Work
A former Ed. Dept. official predicts the program will generate $3 billion for scholarships in 2027.
•
9 min read
The United States Capitol building as a bookcase filled with red, white, and blue policy books in a Washington DC landscape.
Luca D'Urbino for Education Week
Education Funding Ed. Dept. Meets Research Spending Deadline—But Bigger Funding Challenges Loom
The Institute of Education Sciences finished spending more than $170 million set to expire Sept. 30.
3 min read
Director of the United States Office of Management and Budget Russell Vought walks down a staircase on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, July 16, 2026.
Russell Vought, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, walks down a staircase on Capitol Hill in Washington on July 16, 2026. The OMB withheld millions of dollars from the U.S. Department of Education's research arm for months, raising the possibility it wouldn't spend the money on education research and data collection in time for its Sept. 30, 2026, expiration.
Allison Robbert/AP
Education Funding Trump's Ed. Dept. Is Still Disrupting Grants—Just More Quietly Than Before
The agency is deploying subtler procedures that result in fewer new grants and less stability for recipients.
11 min read
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., center, confers with Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, talk following a Senate Democratic Caucus meeting, at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 3, 2026.
Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, (right, speaking with Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer) secured a commitment from Education Secretary Linda McMahon to supply additional funding for Native Hawaiian Education Program grantees when the U.S. Department of Education hadn't launched a competition for new grants. The Trump administration practice of abruptly canceling existing competitive education grants has slowed, but the Education Department is using procedures that result in fewer new grants and less stability for funding recipients.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Education Funding Trump, Bucking Congress Yet Again, Cancels $100 Million for Education
A "pocket rescission" hits programs for migratory farmworkers and college-level language instruction.
7 min read
Russell Vought, acting director, Office of Management and Budget, right, and Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin listen during a cabinet meeting, Friday, July 31, 2026, at Camp David, the presidential retreat, near Thurmont, Md., Friday, July 31, 2026.
Russell Vought, director of the White House Office of Management, listens during a Cabinet meeting on July 31, 2026, at Camp David, the presidential retreat, near Thurmont, Md. The White House has announced an $810 million package of "pocket rescissions," saying it won't spend the congressionally appropriated funds before the end of the 2026 federal fiscal year, which ends Wednesday. The rescissions include nearly $100 million for U.S. Department of Education program.
Jacquelyn Martin/AP