Education Funding

Race to Top’s Live Performances: How Key Were They?

March 29, 2010 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Next week, when the Education Department posts videos of the Race to the Top finalists’ appearances before a panel of reviewers, we’ll get to judge for ourselves which states came with tight, well-rehearsed pitches and which states fumbled, or may have just flat-out bombed.

But while we wait for those sure-to-be scintillating performances to go online, we can learn quite a bit about how each finalist did by comparing how many points they had going into the 90-minute presentations with how many points they had as their final score.

For two finalists&mdash New York and Ohio&mdash it’s an embarrassing outcome.

Both states lost points after making their live presentations: New York dropped by 2.6 points to finish in 15th place, and Ohio lost 4.8 points to end in 10th place. Going into the presentations, Ohio was tied with Illinois for fourth place with 423.4 points. What went wrong, Ohio?

It looks like the judges had a hard time squaring Ohio’s reform plans on paper with the political and logistical challenges that became clear during the state delegation’s interview. For example, one judge wrote that “professional union participation is presently only contemplated” in some school districts and that formal participation would have to be negotiated. That, said the reviewer, could negatively affect statewide implementation and impact.

Among the judges’ comments on New York’s presentation was one that said the state’s Race to the Top team failed to provide “enough explanation” as to how its department of education would ensure that the reforms it was proposing would be adopted on a wide-scale basis. And the judges docked New York for its team’s response to a question about the state’s cap on charters, which as the judge put it, “was not convincing enough to allay fears, that, as a state, NY lacks the collective will to make critical changes to existing laws that act as impediments to substantive reform.”

Delaware, which, along with Tennessee, won round one of the competition, must have knocked it out of the park with its presentation. Already in a strong second place position with 438.4 points as it headed into the final presentation, Delaware’s final score rose a whopping 16.2 points, which propelled it to a first place finish over Tennessee with 454.6 points. Tennessee only gained 0.8 points after its presentation to end with a final score of 444.2.

Jack Markell, Delaware’s governor, said in a conference call with reporters that the state’s Race to the Top delegation, which included him, rehearsed for seven straight days for several hours each day. He gave huge props to Diane Donohue, the president of the Delaware State Education Association, for her role on the team. She presented the state’s teacher effectiveness plan, which clearly made an impression on the judges.

In comments about the state’s presentation, one wrote that Delaware’s team “strongly conveyed the 100 percent commitment and buy-in from teachers and the teachers’ union.”

Related Tags:

A version of this news article first appeared in the State EdWatch blog.

Events

Mathematics Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: Breaking the Cycle: How Districts are Turning around Dismal Math Scores
Math myth: Students just aren't good at it? Join us & learn how districts are boosting math scores.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Achievement Webinar
How To Tackle The Biggest Hurdles To Effective Tutoring
Learn how districts overcome the three biggest challenges to implementing high-impact tutoring with fidelity: time, talent, and funding.
Content provided by Saga Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Reframing Behavior: Neuroscience-Based Practices for Positive Support
Reframing Behavior helps teachers see the “why” of behavior through a neuroscience lens and provides practices that fit into a school day.
Content provided by Crisis Prevention Institute

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Funding Using AI to Guide School Funding: 4 Takeaways
One state is using AI to help guide school funding decisions. Will others follow?
5 min read
 Illustration of a robot hand drawing a graph line leading to budget and finalcial spending.
iStock/Getty
Education Funding A State Uses AI to Determine School Funding. Is This the Future or a Cautionary Tale?
Nevada reworked its funding formula hoping to target extra aid to students most in need. What happened could hold lessons for other states.
13 min read
Illustration of robotic hand putting coins into jar.
iStock / Getty Images Plus
Education Funding How States Are Rethinking Where School Funding Should Go
There's constant debate over the best way to allocate state money to schools. Here are some ways states are reworking their school funding.
7 min read
Conceptual illustration of tiny people is planning the personal budget, accounting, analysis.
Muhamad Chabibalwi/iStock/Getty
Education Funding A Court Ordered Billions for Education. Why Schools Might Not Get It Now
The North Carolina Supreme Court is considering arguments for overturning a statewide order for more school funding.
6 min read
A blue maze with a money bag at the end of the maze.
iStock/Getty