Federal

NCLB Once Again a Legislative Target of Minnesota Critics

By Katie Ash — January 15, 2008 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

When the Minnesota legislature reconvenes next month, state senators will debate whether the state should refuse to follow mandates under the No Child Left Behind Act—potentially forfeiting up to $250 million in annual federal funding.

“I believe in local control of schools,” said Sen. Geoff Michel, who represents Senate Republicans on the issue. He said the NCLB law “has grown the federal role in schools, in education, and in teaching, and I think that’s dangerous.”

Breaking with NCLB is an option the legislature has considered in the past, but never actually done. Sen. Michel believes the initiative could gain support this time because “there’s more interest now, [and] there’s more frustration now.” The issue is also timely, he said, since the 6-year-old law is up for reauthorization by Congress.

Supporters of such a move could be heartened by a decision last week by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit that revived a federal lawsuit in which school districts in three states—not including Minnesota—are challenging obligations for spending under the law. (“Court Ruling in NCLB Suit Fuels Fight Over Costs,” Jan. 16, 2008.)

Although the latest push in Minnesota is spearheaded by Senate Republicans—it remains to be seen if any in the House of Representatives will sign on as well—Sen. Michel believes it has bipartisan support in his chamber.

But Sen. Charles W. Wiger, a Democrat and the chairman of the Senate education committee, said his stance on the bill is that “Congress should mend it, not end it.” He is especially concerned about the prospect of forfeiting federal aid.

See Also

See other stories on education issues in Minnesota. See data on Minnesota’s public school system.

“At a time when school budgets are stretched to the limit, … we can’t afford that loss of funding,” he said.

In Sen. Michel’s view, however, even if the state were to lose federal aid, it might be better off if it does not have to comply with the law’s requirements, which include annual testing and other accountability provisions.

“I think it’s also a really strong statement from us that we’d rather have the discretion and flexibility than the money,” said Sen. Michel. “We’re not going to be held hostage by the federal government any longer when it comes to educating our kids.”

A version of this article appeared in the January 16, 2008 edition of Education Week

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Unlocking Success for Struggling Adolescent Readers
The Science of Reading transformed K-3 literacy. Now it's time to extend that focus to students in grades 6 through 12.
Content provided by STARI
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
Climb: A New Framework for Career Readiness in the Age of AI
Discover practical strategies to redefine career readiness in K–12 and move beyond credentials to develop true capability and character.
Content provided by Pearson

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Moms for Liberty Wanted School Board Seats. They Got a Voice in the White House
Moms for Liberty is being embraced by the Trump administration and gaining new influence in national decisions.
6 min read
Tina Descovich poses for a portrait Monday, March 23, 2026, in Washington.
Tina Descovich poses for a portrait Monday, March 23, 2026, in Washington. The co-founder of Moms for Liberty estimates she's been to the White House a dozen times since the start of the second Trump administration, which has leaned in to many of the culture war battles the organization started fighting at the school board level five years ago.
Allison Robbert/AP
Federal Tracker See Which Ed. Dept. Programs Are Moving to New Agencies: A Tracker
K-12 and higher education programs are heading to new agencies as part of Trump administration downsizing.
1 min read
Photo collaged image of the U.S. Department of Education shattering.
Vanessa Solis/Education Week + AP + Getty
Federal Meet the Trump Cabinet Secretaries Taking Over Ed. Dept. Programs
The U.S. Department of Education is shifting more than 100 programs to other federal agencies.
1 min read
President Donald Trump speaks during a Cabinet meeting at the White House, on March 26, 2026, in Washington.
President Donald Trump speaks during a Cabinet meeting at the White House, on March 26, 2026, in Washington. Six Cabinet members are now on track to have a hand in managing U.S. Department of Education programs.
Alex Brandon/AP
Federal Trump Admin. Sues Minnesota Over Transgender Athletes in Girls' Sports
It's the third state the Trump administration has sued over transgender participation in athletics.
2 min read
Attorney General Pam Bondi in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, on Feb. 20, 2026, in Washington.
Attorney General Pam Bondi in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, on Feb. 20, 2026, in Washington. The Justice Department under Bondi has now sued three states over policies allowing transgender athletes to compete in girls' sports
Alex Brandon/AP