Law & Courts

Louisiana’s Ten Commandments Law Gets Full Federal Appeals Court Review

By Mark Walsh — October 07, 2025 2 min read
Jackson County High School in Kentucky posts the Ten Commandments in the front hall of the school, shown here in 2000, and in every classroom, on June 25, 2025. A group of North Texas reverends filed a federal lawsuit this week to challenge a new state law that would require posting the Ten Commandments in each public school classroom.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A full federal appeals court said late Monday that it will review the constitutionality of Louisiana’s law requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools.

The decision raises the stakes for the Louisiana law, which was originally set to take effect on Jan. 1 of this year but had been blocked by a district judge and a three-judge appellate panel. It also keeps the issue from reaching the U.S. Supreme Court for now, where Ten Commandments supporters hope the court’s conservative majority will be receptive to their arguments.

In June, a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, in New Orleans, upheld an injunction blocking the law, ruling that the statute was likely unconstitutional under Stone v. Graham, a 1980 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a similar Kentucky law.

Louisiana asked the full 5th Circuit to rehear the case en banc, or by all the judges on the court, but the full court took several months to respond.

Meanwhile, in August, a federal district judge blocked a Texas law that also requires Ten Commandments displays in schools. Texas has asked the full 5th Circuit to hear its appeal of that ruling in conjunction with any review of the Louisiana case.

(An Arkansas Ten Commandments law has also been blocked, but that state is not part of the 5th Circuit.)

The full 5th Circuit, in a brief order on Oct. 6, vacated the panel’s earlier decision in the Louisiana case and ordered the parties to file new briefs by Nov. 5 for the state and Dec. 5 for the challengers, a group of multi-faith or non-religious parents and their children.

The 5th Circuit has not acted on the Texas request, and that appeal continues to move forward before a three-judge panel.

Louisiana Attorney General Elizabeth Murrill, a Republican who is defending the law, said on X, “I’m glad to see the Fifth Circuit is taking this en banc. Looking forward to those arguments in court.”

The groups behind the challenge, which include Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Freedom From Religion Foundation, issued a statement that said the three-judge panel’s June ruling “was well reasoned and correctly followed binding Supreme Court precedent. We believe there is no reason to revisit it.”

Still, the groups said they are looking forward to presenting their case to the full 5th Circuit. They noted that a federal district court injunction blocking the Louisiana law from taking effect remains in place.

Events

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts What Schools Need to Know About the Supreme Court’s Transgender Sports Ruling
The justices upheld two state laws that bar transgender girls from participating in female sports.
10 min read
A group prays outside of the Supreme Court ahead of the court's ruling on whether transgender girls and women can play on school athletic teams, on June 30, 2026, on Capitol Hill in Washington.
A group prays outside of the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of the court's ruling on whether transgender girls and women can play on school athletic teams, on June 30, 2026, in Washington. The court upheld two state laws barring transgender girls from joining girls' school sports teams.
Jose Luis Magana/AP
Law & Courts Judges Strike Down Trump Admin.'s Student Loan Forgiveness Overhaul
Two judges sided with advocates who said the program risked becoming a tool for political retribution.
3 min read
In this May 5, 2018, file photo, graduates at the University of Toledo commencement ceremony in Toledo, Ohio.
Graduates at the University of Toledo commencement ceremony in Toledo, Ohio, on May 5, 2018. Two judges have ruled against the Trump administration's overhaul of a public service loan forgiveness program for which teachers have qualified.
Carlos Osorio/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship, Rejecting Trump's Proposed Limits
The justices relied on the 14th Amendment and federal law to rule that anyone born in the U.S. is a citizen.
4 min read
Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group portrait in Washington, Oct. 7, 2022. Bottom row, from left, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Elena Kagan. Top row, from left, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The Supreme Court justices will take the bench Monday, July 1, 2024, to release their last few opinions of the term, including their most closely watched case: whether former President Donald Trump has immunity from criminal prosecution.
Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group portrait in Washington, Oct. 7, 2022. Bottom row, from left, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito, and Justice Elena Kagan. Top row, from left, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The high court, on June 30, 2026, rejected President Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Law & Courts States Can Ban Transgender Athletes, Supreme Court Decides
The court ruled that state bans in Idaho and West Virginia don’t violate the Constitution or Title IX.
3 min read
People advocate for a ban on transgender women and girls participating in women's and girls' sports outside the U.S. Supreme Court building as the court announced decisions in Washington, on June 29, 2026.
People advocate for a ban on transgender women and girls participating in women's and girls' sports outside the U.S. Supreme Court building as the court announced decisions in Washington, on June 29, 2026. The Supreme Court ruled on June 30, 2026, that states may enforce laws restricting transgender athletes’ participation on girls’ and women’s sports teams.
Francis Chung/Politico via AP