Federal

Anniversary Brings Fresh Scrutiny Of Federal School Law

January 07, 2004 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

With the two-year anniversary of the No Child Left Behind Act at hand, the comprehensive federal school improvement law is being analyzed intensely in academic and policy circles.

“Penalizing Diverse Schools?” is available from the Education Policy Research Unit at Arizona State University. (Requires Adobe’s Acrobat Reader.)

Harvard University researchers Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West, in examining the likely long-term impact of the law, predicted that states would be pressured to water down their accountability measures as more and more schools failed to meet high standards.

“Accountability systems tend to soften over time,” Mr. Peterson, also a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, said at a Dec. 11 briefing here. “They get legislated like lions and implemented like lambs.”

But the two researchers suggest that even less rigorous accountability systems can produce positive results. Their findings are based on research and analysis of accountability efforts presented in No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of Accountability, a new book they edited for the Washington-based Brookings Institution.

The editors say the law—signed by President Bush on Jan. 8, 2002—would be more effective if it included provisions for holding individual students accountable for their own performance.

Secretary of Education Rod Paige said that while federal officials are trying to provide some flexibility as they work with states on implementing the law, “we are going to hold the line against softer accountability.”

“We will enable success, and then we will require compliance,” he said at the Brookings briefing.

A new California study suggests that the more diverse a school’s enrollment, the more likely that school will fall short of improvement targets required by the federal law.

That’s the basic finding from “Penalizing Diverse Schools?” a study released by Policy Analysis for California Education, a think tank based at Stanford University and the University of California, Berkeley.

Looking at student-testing results for California’s 7,669 K-12 schools, the researchers found that urban and suburban schools serving more than one student subgroup faced higher odds of missing state performance goals under the federal law than schools with more homogeneous enrollments.

To pass muster, schools must test 95 percent of students in each subgroup—including, for example, students with disabilities, poor students, students from various racial and ethnic groups, and students with limited English skills—and show that they are making improvement.

Shining a Light

Meanwhile, Washington Partners LLC, a government-affairs and public-policy firm here, hosted a daylong conference Dec. 15 to examine the act’s core mandate that all schools make “adequate yearly progress” toward academic proficiency for all children by the end of the 2013-14 school year.

“I don’t know what I can’t do yet, so I think this is all doable,” Henry L. Johnson, Mississippi’s state schools superintendent since August 2002, said when discussing the federal requirements. “The goals are worthwhile goals.”

Mr. Johnson said the law has helped shine “a light” on schools that persistently serve a specific group or groups of children poorly.

“I’m a very strong advocate for the No Child Left Behind legislation,” said Eric J. Smith, the superintendent of the 75,000-student Anne Arundel County school system in Maryland, also speaking at the event. He suggested that the biggest challenges may be not for large urban systems, but for suburban districts that now must work toward ensuring that all their students, including minority and poor children, meet high standards.

Eugene W. Hickok, the acting U.S. deputy secretary of education, later in the day at the Dec. 15 event addressed rising complaints that the law is unrealistic. If not all students, he asked, what percentage ought the United States expect to reach the goal of proficiency?

“I don’t see how we could have done it any other way,” he said of the blanket requirement.

“You know what? We might fall short,” Mr. Hickok added. “It is a pretty lofty aspiration, but you know, I guess I’d rather fall short of a lofty aspiration than start out with lower expectations. I hope that doesn’t sound too corny.”

Mr. Hickok reiterated the Department of Education’s stance that now is not the time to change the federal law, though he indicated that the federal agency would consider revising guidance and regulations if needed.

Associate editors Kathleen Kennedy Manzo and Debra Viadero contributed to this story.

Related Tags:

Events

Federal Webinar The Trump Budget and Schools: Subscriber Exclusive Quick Hit
EdWeek subscribers, join this 30-minute webinar to find out what the latest federal policy changes mean for K-12 education.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Webinar
End Student Boredom: K-12 Publisher's Guide to 70% Engagement Boost
Calling all K-12 Publishers! Student engagement flatlining? Learn how to boost it by up to 70%.
Content provided by KITABOO
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management
Moving the Needle on Attendance: What’s Working NOW
See how family engagement is improving attendance, and how to put it to work in schools.
Content provided by TalkingPoints

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Judge Tells Trump Admin. to Reverse Education Department Layoffs
The order also blocks the transfer of department functions to other agencies as well as an executive order aimed at dismantling the agency.
7 min read
Alejandra Rodriguez, 9, of Key Largo, Fla., watches as college students protest in support of the Department of Education, Thursday, March 20, 2025, outside the department in Washington.
Nine-year-old Alejandra Rodriguez of Key Largo, Fla., watches as college students protest in support of the Department of Education on March 20, 2025, outside the federal agency in Washington. A federal judge has ordered the department to reinstate all staff it has terminated since President Donald Trump's inauguration.
Jacquelyn Martin/AP
Federal What Is 'Illegal DEI?' Trump Admin.'s School Probes Start to Paint a Picture
Department probes focused on rooting out DEI have mostly targeted colleges. But the Trump administration is also looking toward K-12.
7 min read
Conceptual image of diversity.
iam2mai/iStock/Getty
Federal Judge Reverses Ed. Dept.'s Abrupt End to States' Time to Spend COVID Relief
The order comes after Education Secretary Linda McMahon effectively canceled more than $1 billion in remaining pandemic relief funding.
4 min read
Conceptual illustration of a coin in the top section of an hour glass
Dumitru Ochievschi/iStock/Getty
Federal Opinion Trump's Barrage of Executive Orders for Education: How Significant Are They?
A Washington insider discusses the immediate—and long-term—implications of the administration's education goals.
8 min read
The United States Capitol building as a bookcase filled with red, white, and blue policy books in a Washington DC landscape.
Luca D'Urbino for Education Week