Federal Federal File

A Flaw in NCLB Is Acknowledged by Spellings

By David J. Hoff — February 26, 2008 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings is traveling the country to promote what she and others, certainly, view as the success of the No Child Left Behind Act. But in a visit to Topeka, Kan., last week, she acknowledged that one of the federal education law’s provisions was flawed.

The requirement that states identify “persistently dangerous schools” hasn’t worked well, Ms. Spellings said in a roundtable discussion with educators, business leaders, and Kansas officials.

“A not very successful part of the law is this labeling schools as persistently dangerous, which states and law-enforcement officials have been reluctant to do,” Ms. Spellings said, according to the Associated Press. “I think we’re still trying to figure out how to define and how to address some of those issues.”

The matter arose during the Feb. 20 discussion, which happened six days after a former student killed five students and himself on the campus of Northern Illinois University in DeKalb. The “persistently dangerous” school requirements don’t apply to colleges and universities.

See Also

For more stories on this topic see No Child Left Behind and our Federal news page.

Ms. Spellings noted that the university’s officials had done “everything they could have” to prevent a tragedy and intervene during the event.

“This continues, sadly, to remind us that every single day we need to make sure our school safety plans are in place, that people know about them,” she said.

In her comments, Ms. Spellings essentially agreed with a Department of Education advisory group, which proposed changing the label to avoid the stigma associated with being declared a “persistently dangerous” school. (“Law’s ‘Persistently Dangerous’ Tag Weighed,” Nov. 1, 2006.)

Last year, a House draft bill to reauthorize the NCLB law would have eliminated the phrase “persistently dangerous schools.”

It would have created a new program in which districts would have needed to inform parents if their children’s schools did not “have a safe climate for academic achievement,” the bill said.

But the Bush administration has not made specific recommendations on changing the school safety sections of the NCLB law.

A version of this article appeared in the February 27, 2008 edition of Education Week

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Special Education Webinar
Hidden Costs of Special Ed Vacancies: Solutions for Your District
When provider vacancies hit, students feel it first. Hear what district leaders are doing to keep IEP-related services on track.
Content provided by Huddle Up
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Turn Athletic Facilities Into School-Wide Communication Hubs
Districts are turning idle scoreboards into revenue streams, student learning opportunities, and community platforms. See how yours can too.
Content provided by Digital Scoreboards
Mathematics K-12 Essentials Forum Middle and High School Math: How to Get Struggling Learners on Track
Join this free virtual event to uncover the nature of students’ weaknesses in secondary-level math and find a path forward.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Opinion Trump's K-12 Leader: Let’s Improve Assessment Without Sacrificing Accountability
The Ed. Dept. is shrinking the federal footprint but raising academic expectations, says Kirsten Baesler.
Kirsten Baesler
4 min read
A pencil leaning against the wall. The shadow of a ladder shade reflected on the wall.
Education Week + E+/Getty
Federal 'Creative' or 'Illegal?' Congress Debates Trump's Dismantling of Education Dept.
Republicans praised Linda McMahon for shrinking the federal K-12 footprint. Democrats raised concerns.
6 min read
Education Secretary Linda McMahon arrives to testify during the House Education and Workforce Committee hearing titled "Examining the Policies and Priorities of the Department of Education," in Rayburn building on Thursday, May 14, 2026.
Education Secretary Linda McMahon arrives to testify during the House Education and Workforce Committee hearing on Thursday, May 14, 2026. She defended the movement of dozens of her department's programs to other agencies and a budget proposal that would eliminate dozens of federal education programs.
Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP
Federal Democrats Challenge Plan to Dismantle Office for English Learners
The Education Department notified Congress in February of its plans to dismantle OELA.
6 min read
Collage of the Capitol building and McMahon.
Collage with Jason Andrew for Education Week + Canva
Federal Trump Brings the Presidential Physical Fitness Award Back, Reviving Annual Test
Trump is bringing back a competitive fitness test that was a public-school fixture for decades.
2 min read
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. speaks as President Donald Trump listens before the signing of a proclamation in the Oval Office at the White House, Tuesday, May 5, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)