Equity & Diversity Opinion

The Myth of Education as the ‘Great Equalizer’

By Marc Tucker — April 12, 2013 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

We Americans have long liked to think of ourselves as born into a
classless society, a place in which the best jobs, the highest incomes
and the upper reaches of social status are reached not by being born
into the right family, but by merit. We believe that our schools make
it possible for low status, poor and minority people with smarts, drive
and ambition to ascend to the top. But what if this is increasingly a
myth? What if our education system now serves mainly those already at
the top, enabling their children to get the greatest possible advantages
in the race at the expense of everyone else?

In the mid-60s, James Coleman, in an iconic U.S. Government report, Equality of Educational Opportunity,
said that the biggest influence on student achievement was not anything
having to do with the schools they attended, but rather the
socio-economic status of their parents. No doubt this is partly because
wealthy communities can easily raise enough money for their public
schools to buy the best teachers, facilities, materials and school

But that may leave out the most important
variable, the socio-economic status of the other students in the
school. Take for example, the conditions in a typical low-income,
mostly minority community: expectations for all students are low,
students get As for doing mediocre work, the curriculum is not
challenging, classrooms are constantly disrupted, teachers have a hard
time maintaining order, students who strive for academic excellence are
ostracized by their peers and few go to college. In a wealthy school
district serving mostly students from well-to-do families, all is
reversed: expectations are high, classroom discipline is not a problem,
students are paying attention in class; they have to work for their As
and are not ostracized by their peers for doing well in their classes.
The curriculum is challenging and designed to put all students on a
track that will get a great majority of them into selective colleges.

In a process brilliantly described by Richard Florida,
the “creatives” the professionals most in demand in the new economy,
are concentrating in a relatively small number of cities where they are
most likely to get the environment they are seeking, while the people
who used to work at the factories whose owners moved the business
offshore are increasing concentrated, losing their homes and working, if
they can get any work at all, at the local convenience store. An
article in last week’s New York Times tells us that these trends
feed on themselves, as rising real estate values in the favored
communities are matched by falling real estate values in the others,
driving the fortunes of these two types of communities steadily farther

All over the United States, the professionals and managers
in our society who can afford to do so are seeking every possible
advantage for their children and, as income disparities increase, they
are succeeding to an ever-increasing degree. Their aim is to get their
children into the most selective colleges in the nation, because they
see those institutions as the keyhole their children must go through to
get the best jobs and the highest status that society has to offer.

is it about this vanishingly small number of elite institutions that
makes them the gateway to success for the children of the new elite? Is
it the quality of education they will get there? Not so much. The
answer lies just where it lay in the schools. It is mainly the
community to which they gain access, their classmates.

In another very insightful article in the New York Times,
Ross Douthat points out that, whereas elite families used to send their
daughters to the Ivy league colleges to get married to the future
masters of the universe, now the top professionals and managers are
sending both their sons and daughters to those institutions so they can
meet and marry the future masters and mistresses of the universe and
build social networks with their classmates and their professors that
will give them privileged access to the best jobs and highest status the
society has to offer. Those social networks will pay off for the rest
of their lives. From the time they are born until they enter the job
market, the sons and daughters of our top professionals and managers
have incomparably better access to the resources they will need to reach
the pinnacles of success. With each successive year the chances that
our professional and managerial elite will be able to pass their status
along to their progeny improves and the likelihood that the sons and
daughters of the less fortunate will inherit the status of their parents
also improves. Education policy, as I see it, does not offset this
trend. It actually aids and abets it. In my next blog, I will explain
how the growth of massive open online courses could exacerbate this

Follow NCEE @CtrEdEcon.

The opinions expressed in Top Performers are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.