School & District Management

Aid Disparities in Needy Schools Seen as Rising

By Joetta L. Sack — October 12, 2004 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The gap in school funding between wealthy and poor districts is growing in most states, a striking reversal of progress made during better economic times, according to a report issued last week.

In the report, the Washington-based Education Trust blames cash-strapped states for the disparities, which average just more than $1,300 per student across the country.

Read the report, “Funding Gap 2004,” from The Education Trust. (Requires Adobe’s Acrobat Reader.)

Looking at districts’ bottom lines, the trust found that districts in high-poverty areas in 25 states received less money from state and local sources than their wealthier counterparts did, and that 31 states had spending gaps for their high-minority districts. When adjusted to account for additional costs associated with an equal education for children from low-income families, 36 states were found to have funding gaps.

The study used U.S. Census and Department of Education data from the 2001-02 school year, the most recent available.

The Education Trust, a research and advocacy group for disadvantaged students, says that progress toward ending the funding gap was being made in the middle to late 1990s, when states were seeing budget surpluses and pumping much of that money into education.

But with the fallout from the recent recession, not only has the trend reversed, but the average gap is also wider than before.

Ross Wiener, the policy director for the Education Trust, said that he was disappointed, but not surprised, at the results. “When state budgets are tight, the highest-poverty districts tend to lose out the most,” he said.

“The worry,” Mr. Wiener added, “is that these trends have probably accelerated and gotten worse in these places.”

The study, the latest in a series of reports the Education Trust has conducted since 2001, looked at K-12 funding provided by state and local budgets, but not aid from the federal government, because 90 percent of schools’ money comes from their states and school districts.

The shortfalls, says the report’s author, Kevin Carey, “are starkly at odds with our national goals for closing the achievement gap.”

Moreover, the numbers understate the extent of the problem, writes Mr. Carey, who is a senior policy analyst at Education Trust, because they do not factor in the additional costs of educating students living in poverty.

Mulling ‘No Child’ Impact

Over the past three years, most states faced serious budget shortfalls, and many were forced to cut education budgets. At the same time, state officials pointed to the new demands of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, which became law in January 2002.

Scott Young, a senior policy specialist at the National Conference of State Legislatures, located in Denver, said the law has forced states to use federal dollars that used to target Title I students, to comply with the law’s sweeping requirements. Among other provisions, schools must make adequate yearly progress in raising achievement, or face sanctions.

“Prior to No Child Left Behind, the federal money was narrowly focused on Title I students,” Mr. Young said. “Now, the scope has drastically increased.”

Mr. Wiener is more concerned that states are not committed to achieving equity in school funding. The Education Trust has been a strong supporter of the No Child Left Behind law, which the group sees as a spur to a high-quality education for all children.

The law “is forcing states to address long-standing achievement gaps in their own systems,” he said, “but No Child Left Behind simply doesn’t control how much money they raise at state levels.”

Further, the No Child Left Behind Act gives additional aid to states that have created more equitable funding systems, Mr. Wiener said, and many states are missing out on that pot of money.

Recent ncsl reports, meanwhile, have shown states’ financial outlooks to be improving slightly. (“Lawmakers Greet Rosy Budget Picture With Caution,” July 28, 2004.)

Recommendations to States

The Education Trust report found that several states with large populations had the widest disparities in funding. New York and Illinois had the largest disparities, with gaps of more than $2,000 per pupil in each state, followed by Virginia, with $1,105.

In New York, the gap translated into a difference of $65,375 between classes at low-income and high-income schools. Between two typical 400-student elementary schools, the difference in available funds added up to just over $1 million, the report says. In Virginia, the totals were $35,750 between classes and $572,000 between elementary schools.

Charles Pyle, a spokesman for the Virginia Department of Education, noted that the new state education budget contains a $758 million increase, to $9.2 billion, for the 2005-06 biennium. Much of that money is targeted to needy students, he said.

Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Alaska were applauded for providing significantly more resources to their high-poverty schools than wealthier schools. Massachusetts, for instance, provides $1,343 more per pupil to its low-income schools than their wealthier counterparts.

One of the reasons that higher-income districts did not suffer as much as poorer ones during the economic slowdown, the report says, is that they had strong property-tax bases.

The Education Trust makes several recommendations to states for easing the finance gap:

• Increasing the share of state funding for education;

• Reducing reliance on local property taxes to pay for education;

• Targeting more aid toward children from low-income families; and

• Promoting budget practices that give schools within each district the same amount of per-pupil funding, with adjustments for students living in poverty.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Professional Development Webinar
Inside PLCs: Proven Strategies from K-12 Leaders
Join an expert panel to explore strategies for building collaborative PLCs, overcoming common challenges, and using data effectively.
Content provided by Otus
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Science Webinar
Making Science Stick: The Engaging Power of Hands-On Learning
How can you make science class the highlight of your students’ day while
achieving learning outcomes? Find out in this session.
Content provided by LEGO Education
Teaching Profession Key Insights to Elevate and Inspire Today’s Teachers
Join this free half day virtual event to energize your teaching and cultivate a positive learning experience for students.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School & District Management Q&A This City Can Claim a NAEP Distinction No Other City Can. Here's What Happened
While American students saw another decline in 4th grade reading scores on the Nation's Report Card, this city was an exception.
6 min read
Diverse elementary students reading in the classroom
iStock/Getty Images
School & District Management Do Students Suffer When a Superintendent Leaves? A New Study Has an Answer
A new study is the first in a while to explore how students fare academically when there's turnover in the district's top office.
5 min read
A man places his hand on top of his head as he looks up at an upwardly pointing arrow turning downward as it turns a corner.
iStock/Getty Images
School & District Management What Latino Superintendents Say It Will Take to Grow Their Ranks
Three Latino superintendents talked about the direct and indirect paths to building a pipeline of future district leaders of color.
4 min read
Vector image of many professionals, diversity, highlighting hispanic.
Liz Yap/Education Week and iStock/Getty
School & District Management Opinion Your School Needs a Teacher-Mentorship Program
We all know how critical the first few years of teaching are. Here's how to set teachers up for success.
Pamela Slifer
4 min read
Mentorship development of young teachers. School leaders make the teaching profession more sustainable by developing a robust mentoring program in their school.
Vanessa Solis/Education Week via Canva