Report Roundup

Charter Schools

"Hidden in Plain Sight"

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Students in charter schools that are run by for-profit companies perform markedly worse than their peers in charters managed by nonprofit groups, according to a study.

The study, conducted by the Center for Research on Education Outcomes at Stanford University, or CREDO, found on average, that students in nonprofit-run schools had faster academic growth than those in for-profit schools—equal to about 23 extra days of learning in math and six days in reading.

Researchers studied 5,700 charter schools in 24 states and the District of Columbia.

Students in nonprofit charters saw faster academic growth than peers in traditional public schools, equal to about 11 extra days of reading and math instruction. However, students in for-profit charters do no better in reading, and worse in math, than peers in traditional district schools.

Where all charter schools stumbled is in serving special education students. For example, in charter school networks, students receiving special education fell behind their peers in traditional public schools in math by the equivalent of 86 days over the course of a year. For all other types of charter schools, the lag was 108 days.

Vol. 36, Issue 36, Pages 4-5

Published in Print: June 21, 2017, as Charter Schools
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented