Vouchers Are Not the Same as 'School Choice'

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

In a recent article on Betsy DeVos, Education Week repeatedly described the new U.S. secretary of education as a proponent of "school choice" ("DeVos Takes Hot Seat in Confirmation Quest," Jan. 25, 2017).

A voucher program does not constitute school choice. If an upper-middle-class or rich family uses a voucher to help pay for a private school their child already attends, it takes away money from public schools. If a middle-class or poor child wanted to attend a private school, a voucher typically would not cover the entire cost of that private school, so the child likely could not attend because the parents still could not afford the tuition. There would be no "school choice" available to these parents or their children.

Charter schools, on the other hand, are public schools that do not need vouchers; they're free to everyone and paid for by public funds.

Basically, what DeVos wants to do is take money away from public schools and give it to private schools without guaranteeing access to all students and without requiring the same accountability that public schools face.

Mary Howland
Fieldwork Supervisor
Department of Learning and Instruction
University of San Francisco
Sonoma, Calif.

Vol. 36, Issue 23, Page 22

Published in Print: March 1, 2017, as Vouchers Are Not the Same as 'School Choice'
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories