New Group Takes Aim at 'Toxic Nature' of K-12 Debate

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

A well-funded new communications organization headed by a former aide to U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan aims to elevate the tone and goals of the national debate over K-12 education policy, its leaders and backers say.

"We plan to bring in voices of a lot of people who are turned off by the toxic nature of the conversation to see if we can facilitate a more productive and respectful conversation," said Peter Cunningham, the executive director of the new group, Education Post. He was assistant secretary for communications and outreach at the U.S. Department of Education for most of President Barack Obama's first term.

Education Post has attracted initial funding of $12 million over three years from the Los Angeles-based Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation, the New York City-based Bloomberg Philanthropies, the Bentonville, Ark.-based Walton Family Foundation, and an anonymous donor. (The Broad Foundation provides support to Education Week for coverage of personalized learning and system leadership; the Walton Family Foundation supports coverage of parent-empowerment issues.)

Common Goals

While Mr. Cunningham said the new group is not meant to be a policy organization, it lists areas of focus that appear to dovetail with goals of the three named funders: high expectations and rigorous standards for every student, accountability for principals and teachers in helping students meet those standards, and charter schools as a viable form of public school choice.

"For some time, we've been disappointed with the tone of the education debate, with a lot of name-calling and a lot of question of people's motives," said Bruce Reed, the president of the Broad Foundation and a former senior White House official under Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.

"We want to see a debate about what works in education," said Mr. Reed, whose foundation funds many areas of education. "Most of the people in the organizations we work with are too busy starting schools or teaching kids to spend much time to take part in a policy debate about what they do."

Mr. Cunningham said some of the new group's work will be behind the scenes, drafting op-ed articles for policymakers, educators, and others, as well as providing strategic advice. But a more public effort will involve writing posts on the organization's own blog and responding to public misconceptions.

"When we see people repeating things that are not true, we'll try to challenge that," he said.

The new organization, based in Chicago, has attracted two other former Duncan aides: Ann Whalen, who played a key role in programs such as Race to the Top, and Tracy Dell'Angela, who was the communications chief of the department's Institute of Education Sciences. Russlyn Ali, who was the department's assistant secretary for civil rights during the first Obama term, is on the fiduciary board of Education Post.

Mix of Reactions

Some professionals in education communications not affiliated with Education Post said they were a bit mystified about whether one more organization in the realm of education policy and ideas could significantly change the debate.

Sheppard Ranbom, the president of CommunicationWorks, a Washington-based public relations firm that focuses on education clients, said he was taken aback by the amount of money contributed to Education Post.

Related Blog

"We're seeing far more money than ever introduced into education communications," he said. "To be successful, this effort needs to show inclusiveness and truly bridge divides, and not just carry the views of any particular group of funders."

Andrew J. Rotherham, the co-founder of the consulting firm Bellwether Education Partners, who has worked in education communications, said he thought the new effort was on the right track.

"What's refreshing is that there is some transparency here" with Education Post and its goals and funders, he said. "I don't understand when having [policy] goals became incompatible with having a civil conversation. There is no one in this entire debate [about improving schools] that doesn't have views."

Vol. 34, Issue 03, Page 10

Published in Print: September 10, 2014, as Group Takes Aim at 'Toxic Nature' Of Nation's Education Policy Debate
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories