Critics Say Agency 'Pushing the Envelope' With School Prayer Guide

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

New legal guidance from the Department of Education on "constitutionally protected prayer" in public schools drew praise last week from religious conservatives. But some school lawyers and advocates of strict church-state separation argued that some of the guidelines go beyond settled law.

"They are really pushing the envelope on religion in public schools," Joseph Conn of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said of the department's guidelines.

The guidance was issued Feb. 7 by Secretary of Education Rod Paige, who was required to do so as part of the "No Child Left Behind" Act of 2001. "Public schools," Mr. Paige said in a letter to educators announcing the legal advice, "should not be hostile to the religious rights of their students and their families."

The guidelines discuss nine specific situations involving religious expression in public schools that have led to debate, and lawsuits, in recent years. For example, the guidance says schools should not bar students from saying grace before meals or reading personal Bibles during lunch or other noninstructional times.

Consensus exists among legal experts that school administrators sometimes go too far in limiting student religious expression.

"School officials tend to err on the side of suppression of religious speech," said Mathew D. Staver, the president of Liberty Counsel, an Orlando, Fla.-based organization that has sued school districts in religious-expression cases.

Mr. Staver said he was pleased with the department's guidelines because "they promote neutrality on the part of public schools."

But other legal experts were troubled by the department's advice in some areas.

Americans United cited the section on student-initiated prayers at student assemblies and extracurricular events. The department advises that when student speakers are selected using "neutral, evenhanded" criteria, administrators may not restrict religious content in their speeches.

"That's not clear at all" from various rulings on student-initiated prayers from the U.S. Supreme Court and lower federal courts, Mr. Conn said. "It seems that wherever they felt they could, [the guidance's authors] leaned in the direction of allowing more religious expression."

Jay Worona, the general counsel of the New York State School Boards Association, expressed worry about the department's guidance that students should not be restricted from bringing religious articles to "show and tell."

"What if a kindergartner starts to proselytize the whole class?" he said. "The guidance suggests school districts can simply disconnect themselves from the message, but I'm not sure that's possible with very young, impressionable students."

A Matter of Money

President Clinton's administration made a similar attempt to help public schools sort through the thicket of religious issues. In 1995, the Education Department issued guidance that covered similar topics. ("President Offers Guidance on Religion in Schools," Aug. 2, 1995.)

But there is a key difference with the new guidance. Under the No Child Left Behind Act, districts and states receiving federal funds must certify to the department that none of their policies prevents "constitutionally protected prayer in public elementary and secondary schools as set forth in this guidance." The department could, in theory, withhold federal aid from districts that don't observe the guidelines.

"There's an element of intimidation here," Mr. Conn said. "School administrators are going to have to lean the way the department wants them to lean."

Mr. Worona said it appears that some districts will face conflicts between the department's guidance and the prevailing federal court rulings in their areas.

Districts must certify to their states by March 15 that they will abide by the department's guidance, and then annually by each Nov. 1 after that.

Vol. 22, Issue 23, Page 25

Published in Print: February 19, 2003, as Critics Say Agency 'Pushing the Envelope' With School Prayer Guide
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >