Equity & Diversity

New Admissions Policy Sought for S.F. School

By Joanna Richardson — January 24, 1996 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

San Francisco’s schools superintendent has proposed modifying the criteria for entrance to the city’s prestigious Lowell High School in hopes of ending a bitter debate over its race-based admissions policy.

The plan released this month by Superintendent Waldemar Rojas would admit 80 percent of the school’s students through a traditional point system based on academic achievement. All those students, regardless of race or ethnicity, would have to meet the same cutoff point for a combination of grade-point average and test scores.

The other 20 percent would be admitted to Lowell based on other criteria that would expand the pool of eligible applicants and enhance diversity in the school’s enrollment, said Gail Kaufman, the spokeswoman for the 63,000-student district.

For example, she added, a student who did not meet the minimum academic requirements but came from a disadvantaged background could be admitted under the proposed policy.

The school board is expected to vote on the superintendent’s plan at its Feb. 23 meeting. School officials hope to use the new policy in March to judge applicants for the 1996-97 school year, Ms. Kaufman said.

The admissions policy at the flagship school has long been a sore spot with many of the city’s Chinese-American parents, who say it discriminates against children of Chinese descent by holding them to higher standards than those for other minority groups.

Last year, a group of parents filed a lawsuit challenging the ethnic-enrollment quotas in a 1983 consent decree in the district’s ongoing school-desegregation case. (See Education Week, Oct. 11, 1995.)

Because of their relatively large numbers and high level of achievement, students of Chinese descent have a more difficult time finding slots in schools of their choice, the lawsuit claims.

The suit singled out the higher standards for Chinese applicants at Lowell, which are intended to limit the number of such students at the school. About 40 percent of the students enrolled this year are Chinese-American.

About 85 percent of the district’s students are members of minority groups, including nearly 50 percent who are of Asian or Pacific Island descent.

‘Equity and Quality’

Mr. Rojas announced his intention to change the admissions criteria at Lowell High after months of discussions with the community leaders, parents, and school employees appointed to the district task force charged with reviewing the policy.

“The time has come to address these issues head-on and make the hard but necessary educational and political decisions,” the schools chief said in a statement this month.

School and community leaders praised the plan last week, saying they believed the bitter fight over the admissions policy was taking a turn for the better.

Currently, students from different racial and ethnic groups must meet varying cutoff points, which were set by the district in an attempt to meet the guidelines of its federal desegregation order, Ms. Kaufman said. When placing students, the district considers their grade-point averages in the 7th and 8th grades, and their scores on the Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills.

But the criticism of such standards led the district to the soul-searching process over its policies. Some local leaders who have long advocated changes in admissions criteria also hailed the superintendent’s proposal.

Seeking Diversity

“This is a big step forward, and it’s long overdue,” said Henry Der, the executive director of Chinese for Affirmative Action, a local parents’ group, and a member of the district’s Lowell task force. He also praised the superintendent’s “recognition that there needs to be changes in the school culture” at Lowell, where high expectations have created a crushing environment for some students.

“Many kids can benefit from a Lowell education--not just those with the [high] grades or test scores,” Mr. Der added.

Under the new policy, 20 percent of Lowell’s students would be admitted based on consideration of such factors as socioeconomic status, homelessness or residency in public housing, poverty, family hardship or illness, and participation in extracurricular activities.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the January 24, 1996 edition of Education Week as New Admissions Policy Sought for S.F. School

Events

Budget & Finance Webinar Creative Approaches to K-12 Budget Realities
What are districts prioritizing in 2026? New survey data reveals emerging K-12 budgeting trends.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
From Coursework to Careers: Expanding Work-Based Learning and Industry Credentials in CTE
Expand work-based learning and industry credentials in CTE to connect classroom learning with real careers and prepare students for future success.
Content provided by Project Lead The Way
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar Data-Driven and District-Ready: What EdWeek Research Tells Us About the CTE Market
Discover how to sharpen your positioning in a fast-moving market of CTE with actionable strategies grounded in EdWeek Research Center data.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Equity & Diversity School District Refuses to Sign Federal Agreement, Change Trans Student Rules
The district refused to sign the agreement despite the looming threats of funding cuts.
Taylor O'Connor, The Kansas City Star
4 min read
Kansas high school students, family members and advocates rally for transgender rights, Jan. 31, 2024, at the Statehouse in Topeka, Kan. On Tuesday, July 2, a federal judge in Kansas blocked a federal rule expanding anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ+ students from being enforced in four states, including Kansas and a patchwork of places elsewhere across the nation.
Kansas high school students, family members and advocates rally for transgender rights, Jan. 31, 2024, at the Statehouse in Topeka, Kan.
John Hanna/AP
Equity & Diversity Opinion The Myths and Realities of Culturally Responsive Teaching
It's time to stop thinking of culturally responsive practices as one more item on the to-do list.
15 min read
Conceptual illustration of classroom conversations and fragmented education elements coming together to form a cohesive picture of a book of classroom knowledge.
Sonia Pulido for Education Week
Equity & Diversity Opinion Minnesota Students Are Living in Perilous Times, Two Teachers Explain
The federal government is committing the "greatest constancy of deliberate community harm."
6 min read
Conceptual illustration of classroom conversations and fragmented education elements coming together to form a cohesive picture of a book of classroom knowledge.
Sonia Pulido for Education Week
Equity & Diversity Opinion 'Survival Mode': A Minnesota Teacher of the Year Decries Immigration Crackdowns
Federal agents are creating trauma and chaos for our students and schools in Minneapolis.
5 min read
Conceptual illustration of classroom conversations and fragmented education elements coming together to form a cohesive picture of a book of classroom knowledge.
Sonia Pulido for Education Week