Accrediting Body Reverses Policy On Disclosure

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

The voluntary national accrediting body for teacher education, in a major change in policy, last week voted to make detailed public disclosures of its judgments on teacher-training programs, including those programs that it decides do not meet its published standards.

The policy council of the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE), meeting in Nashville, also moved to delay until October a final decision on whether or not to adopt controversial "quantifiable" finance standards for the accrediting body, that would, among other things, require education programs to maintain a 12-to-1 student-faculty ratio.

ncate is a nonprofit organization that accredits some 540 colleges and universities that graduate nearly 80 percent of the nation's new teachers each year.

The public-disclosure policy, under development for more than a year, was passed unanimously by the 26-member NCATE governing council.

30-Day Waiting Period

Under the policy, NCATE would inform a school of its accreditation decision and then wait 30 days before sending a detailed account of its findings to the chief state school officer and leading education associations in the school's state.

The report would include information on which of the 24 NCATE standards were not met, the strengths and weaknesses of the education school's programs, the period of time for which a school will be accredited, and a list of the programs approved and disapproved during the current evaluation.

Under the new policy, which is effective immediately, the detailed report will also be available to the public.

NCATE will not make public its evaluation of teacher-training programs that have been denied accreditation if they begin an appeal of the decision within 30 days.

Lyn Gubser, ncate's executive director, described the new public-disclosure policy as an "incredible change" from past practice, under which NCATE did not disclose its accreditation decisions except when asked directly to do so.

He said the policy was adopted to provide "consumer protection" for the public. But he added that is also designed, through the 30-day waiting period, to protect education schools' prerogative to disclose their accreditation standing on their own.

The shift in disclosure policy will likely make negative evaluations by the national accrediting body more damaging to the education schools that submit themselves to ncate's scrutiny.

For that reason, the policy change is likely to be viewed as a bold move by the organization's governing council at a time when NCATE is under considerable fire from many education-school deans who question the utility and the cost of membership in the voluntary accrediting organization.

The proposed "quantifiable" standards have also been attacked by the leaders of many education schools because of the financial burden they would impose.

The NCATE governing board also voted at the Nashville meeting to increase the number of its associate members from eight to 12 and to give them the authority to vote on accreditation decisions.

Vol. 01, Issue 25

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

To Address Chronic Absenteeism, Dig into the Data

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Keep Your Schools Safe and Responsive to Real Challenges

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

3 Unique Learner Profiles for Emerging Bilinguals

Effective Questioning Practices to Spur Thinking

Empower Reading Teachers with Proven Literacy PD

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >