Education

Race in Seattle

August 11, 2004 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A federal appellate court has struck down a system for assigning students to public high schools in Seattle that uses race and ethnicity as a factor. Here are key dates leading up to the July 27 decision:

  • November 1996: The Seattle school board adopts an “open choice” high-school-admission policy that features a “racial tiebreaker” to promote integration.
  • November 1998: State voters pass Initiative 200, banning discrimination or preferential treatment on the basis of race or ethnicity in public jobs, education, and contracting.
  • July 2000: A Seattle parents’ group files a federal lawsuit saying the racial tiebreaker violates I-200, the U.S. Constitution, and the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964.
  • April 2001: A U.S. District Court judge upholds the assignment policy under both the state and federal constitutions, saying that I-200 does not make the policy illegal.
  • April 2002: A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit appeals court unanimously overturns the lower court’s ruling, holding that the policy does run afoul of I-200.
  • June 2002: After the district requests a rehearing, the three-judge panel withdraws its ruling and asks the state supreme court to determine if the policy violates I-200.
  • June 23, 2003: The U.S. Supreme Court issues split opinions in a high-profile pair of cases involving the use of race in student admissions to the University of Michigan.
  • June 26, 2003: The state supreme court decides 8-1 that the Seattle policy does not violate I-200, because the plan treats all racial and ethnic groups similarly.
  • July 27, 2004: In a 2-1 ruling, the three-judge federal panel strikes down the Seattle policy on the grounds that it falls short of standards laid out in the Michigan decisions.

SOURCE: Federal and state court records

Events

Artificial Intelligence K-12 Essentials Forum How AI Use Is Expanding in K-12 Schools
Join this free virtual event to explore how AI technology is—and is not—improving K-12 teaching and learning.
Federal Webinar The Trump Budget and Schools: Subscriber Exclusive Quick Hit
EdWeek subscribers, join this 30-minute webinar to find out what the latest federal policy changes mean for K-12 education.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Webinar
End Student Boredom: K-12 Publisher's Guide to 70% Engagement Boost
Calling all K-12 Publishers! Student engagement flatlining? Learn how to boost it by up to 70%.
Content provided by KITABOO

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Quiz Are You Keeping Up With Trump’s Big Changes to K-12 Funding? Take This Weekly Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Education Quiz How Is Trump Changing School Discipline Rules? Take This Week’s Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Education Briefly Stated: April 30, 2025
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Quiz What Is Trump’s New AI Plan for K-12 Schools? Take This Weekly Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Illustration of tasks assisted with AI.
Canva