Opinion
Education Letter to the Editor

Sending Wrong Message to Special-Needs Pupils

October 18, 2005 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

This letter is in response to the increasing exclusion of students with disabilities from school-level accountability under the No Child Left Behind Act (“AYP Rules Miss Many in Spec.Ed.,” Sept. 21, 2005).

For the past few years, advocates for children with disabilities have been ringing alarm bells about the use of minimum subgroup size to omit such students from school, and sometimes district, adequate-yearly-progress calculations. Now a study has confirmed what we have known all along. This maneuvering is an abuse of a rule designed to prevent subgroups from being too small for statistical reliability, or for confidentiality purposes.

To add to the problem, states are now permitted to “increase the percent of students with disabilities deemed proficient” at certain schools or districts by “the equivalent of 2 percent of all students assessed” (“New Rules on Special Ed. Scores Help Schools Meet NCLB Targets,” Sept. 21, 2005). This increase in the proficiency rate, and the corresponding expansion in the number of schools making AYP, is not tied to any improvement in instruction or upswing in assessment scores. It is purely a matter of inflating the numbers.

The No Child Left Behind law was supposed to provide accountability for the education of all children. The increased exclusion of students with disabilities from school-level accountability sends the unacceptable message that the promise of the No Child Left Behind Act applies differently to them.

Ricki Sabia

Silver Spring, Md.

A version of this article appeared in the October 19, 2005 edition of Education Week as Sending Wrong Message to Special-Needs Pupils

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
The Future of the Science of Reading
Join us for a discussion on the future of the Science of Reading and how to support every student’s path to literacy.
Content provided by HMH
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
From Classrooms to Careers: How Schools and Districts Can Prepare Students for a Changing Workforce
Real careers start in school. Learn how Alton High built student-centered, job-aligned pathways.
Content provided by TNTP
Student Well-Being Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: The Power of Emotion Regulation to Drive K-12 Academic Performance and Wellbeing
Wish you could handle emotions better? Learn practical strategies with researcher Marc Brackett and host Peter DeWitt.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated: July 16, 2025
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
5 min read
Education Follow Education Week’s K-12 Coverage on Bluesky
Education Week has joined the social media platform Bluesky.
1 min read
Illustration of Education Week and Bluesky logos.
F. Sheehan/Education Week
Education Quiz Who Qualifies to Receive the First-ever Federal School Voucher? Take the Quiz to Find Out
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Education Quiz Trump’s Surprise Freeze on School Funding—How Much Do You Know?
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read