Education Letter to the Editor

Proceed With Caution on Growth-Model Pilot

November 28, 2006 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

Evaluating teachers and schools on the basis of the progress their students make during a stipulated time frame, rather than on the basis of their proficiency during the same period, makes eminent sense (“Education Dept. Poised to Approve More States for Growth-Model Pilot,” Nov. 8, 2006). It is a realistic acknowledgment of the way public schools are required to operate in this country. Because they must enroll virtually everyone who shows up at their doors during the school year, they cannot always be expected to achieve proficiency.

But even the progress made by students can too often be the result of factors beyond the control of the best teachers in the finest schools. Proponents of the value-added approach maintain that this metric takes into account such contaminating factors. Yet supporters have failed to adequately explain how this is achieved. The best that they have done is to point out how the value-added model measures the student against himself, as opposed to measuring the student against a single external standard. Under this system, every student’s improvement counts the same toward the school’s overall rating.

That still doesn’t help address questions relating to the technical issues surrounding the value-added model. These include quantifying such events as the impact on performance arising from moving to a new neighborhood, which is particularly common among disadvantaged students. Until more transparency is available, it’s important to proceed with extreme caution in evaluating the instructional effectiveness of teachers and schools involved in the U.S. Department of Education’s pilot program.

Walt Gardner

Los Angeles, Calif.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the November 29, 2006 edition of Education Week as Proceed With Caution on Growth-Model Pilot


Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Science of Reading: Emphasis on Language Comprehension
Dive into language comprehension through a breakdown of the Science of Reading with an interactive demonstration.
Content provided by Be GLAD
English-Language Learners Webinar English Learners and the Science of Reading: What Works in the Classroom
ELs & emergent bilinguals deserve the best reading instruction! The Reading League & NCEL join forces on best practices. Learn more in our webinar with both organizations.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated: February 7, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated: January 31, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education Briefly Stated: January 17, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education In Their Own Words The Stories That Stuck With Us, 2023 Edition
Our newsroom selected five stories as among the highlights of our work. Here's why.
4 min read
102523 IMSE Reading BS
Adria Malcolm for Education Week