Find your next job fast at the Jan. 28 Virtual Career Fair. Register now.
Opinion
Education Letter to the Editor

Debating the Definition of ‘Brain Research’

November 29, 2005 1 min read

To the Editor:

In his Nov. 2, 2005, letter to the editor concerning my Commentary, (“‘Brain Research’— A Call for Skepticism,” Oct. 12, 2005), Ronald Fitzgerald terms my argument “superficial,” “unfair,” and “destructively reactionary.” Yet he fails to engage the argument I have made.

In my Commentary, I question the way physiological studies of brain activity are translated into school practice—for example, the ways they have been used to argue for single-sex classrooms. I try to point out that these applications are highly speculative, and that they rarely engage the actual research, which is dauntingly complex. I therefore urge skepticism.

Mr. Fitzgerald’s criticism comes down to a question of definition. He claims that I use a far too narrow definition of “brain research,” ignoring work in cognition and learning theory that deals “even if indirectly” with the brain.

I was using a stricter definition than he seems to. Neuroscience is, after all, the scientific field that examines the functioning of the brain. If we extend the definition of “brain research” to every activity “indirectly” connected to the brain, where would it stop? It would encompass all aspects of motor and cognitive activity, voluntary and involuntary. What form of human study wouldn’t be “brain research” by his definition?

I have no question that the pedagogical innovations he advocates—such as visual mapping and expanding learning options—can enrich the classroom. But I think it muddies the water to claim, as Mr. Fitzgerald does, that “brain research” includes any study of learning, even “observation of the impact of learning options by individual teachers, schools, and trainers.”

I am all for such observation, but I’m not sure that makes me a brain researcher.

Thomas Newkirk

Durham, N.H.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Branding Matters. Learn From the Pros Why and How
Learn directly from the pros why K-12 branding and marketing matters, and how to do it effectively.
Content provided by EdWeek Top School Jobs
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
How to Make Learning More Interactive From Anywhere
Join experts from Samsung and Boxlight to learn how to make learning more interactive from anywhere.
Content provided by Samsung
Teaching Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table With Education Week: How Educators Can Respond to a Post-Truth Era
How do educators break through the noise of disinformation to teach lessons grounded in objective truth? Join to find out.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

BASE Program Site Director
Thornton, CO, US
Adams 12 Five Star Schools
Director of Information Technology
Montpelier, Vermont
Washington Central UUSD
Great Oaks AmeriCorps Fellow August 2021 - June 2022
New York City, New York (US)
Great Oaks Charter Schools
Director of Athletics
Farmington, Connecticut
Farmington Public Schools

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: January 13, 2021
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read