Education

Justice Department To Contest Chicago Desegregation Funding

By Tom Mirga — July 27, 1983 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The Reagan Administration has appealed a federal district judge’s order requiring the federal government to spend at least $14.6 million this year, and possibly as much as $250 million over the next five years, to help desegregate Chicago’s public schools.

The Justice Department, in papers filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on July 13, said the order handed down by U.S. District Judge Milton I. Shadur constituted “an unwarranted interference and intrusion upon the discretion vested in officials in the executive branch.” The department also filed a motion asking Judge Shadur to stay his order pending the appeal.

‘Every Good Faith Effort’

On June 30, Judge Shadur ruled that the government had failed to live up to its agreement to “make every good faith effort” to help fund the school system’s desegregation plan. The government made that commitment in a consent decree signed by Justice Department officials and the city’s school board in September 1980.

“On the contrary, since Jan. 21, 1983, the executive branch of the United States and the Department of Education have been engaged in a continuous effort to strip away all means by which they could fulfill the United States’ obligations” to Chicago, Judge Shadur said.

In early June, the judge ordered the Administration not to spend $42 million in Education Department funds, pending his final ruling in the case.

Those funds included $24 million in school-desegregation assistance under Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and $18 million from a ''discretionary fund” allocated to Secretary of Education Terrel H. Bell.

In his June 30 ruling, he amended his earlier order and prohibited the spending of $9 million from the Secretary’s fund and a total of $45 million in funds earmarked for Title IV, women’s educational equity, Follow Through, and special assistance to the Virgin Islands. He then ordered the government to give Chicago $14.6 million this year to cover the city’s immediate revenue shortfall for school desegregation in the coming school year.

In addition, he ordered federal officials to work with the Congress to “preserve the availability” of $250n should such shortfalls occur during the next five years.

“This court’s decision is a sweeping and unprecedented judicial intrusion into the formulation of national policy,” the Justice Department said in its motion seeking a stay of the order.

The order, the department continued, is “an affront to the doctrine of separation of powers” and a “profound intrusion into the constitutionally protected domain of the executive branch.”

"[It] marks the first time that a court has directed an official of the executive branch to divert funds from hundreds of federal grantees across the nation in order to finance a desegregation plan for one school district,” the department pointed out. “It marks the first time that a court has ordered the executive branch to seek legislation in derogation of Administration policy if a specified sum of money cannot be produced by reallocating funds.”

The department also questioned how Judge Shadur calculated the $14.6-million figure as the government’s minimum obligation to Chicago for the upcoming school year.

“The nature and scope of the [school board’s] desegregation plan are so broad that they are virtually indistinguishable from all other educational activities conducted by the board,” it said. “It appears that the board is attempting to balance its overall budget by seeking to make the United States responsible for the shortfall.”

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the July 27, 1983 edition of Education Week as Justice Department To Contest Chicago Desegregation Funding

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Special Education Webinar
Integrating and Interpreting MTSS Data: How Districts Are Designing Systems That Identify Student Needs
Discover practical ways to organize MTSS data that enable timely, confident MTSS decisions, ensuring every student is seen and supported.
Content provided by Panorama Education
Artificial Intelligence Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: AI Could Be Your Thought Partner
How can educators prepare young people for an AI-powered workplace? Join our discussion on using AI as a cognitive companion.
Student Well-Being & Movement K-12 Essentials Forum How Schools Are Teaching Students Life Skills
Join this free virtual event to explore creative ways schools have found to seamlessly integrate teaching life skills into the school day.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Opinion The Opinions EdWeek Readers Care About: The Year’s 10 Most-Read
The opinion content readers visited most in 2025.
2 min read
Collage of the illustrations form the top 4 most read opinion essays of 2025.
Education Week + Getty Images
Education Quiz Did You Follow This Week’s Education News? Take This Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Education Quiz How Did the SNAP Lapse Affect Schools? Take This Weekly Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Education Quiz New Data on School Cellphone Bans: How Much Do You Know?
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read