Education

Court Declines To Hear Class-Assignment Case

By Mark Walsh — December 06, 1995 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Washington

The U.S. Supreme Court last week rejected an appeal by a Tennessee woman who argued that an English teacher’s refusal to accept a research paper about the life of Jesus amounted to discrimination against religious speech.

The case of Brittney Settle, who was a 9th grader in Dickson, Tenn., when the dispute arose in 1991, has been widely cited in recent months by religious conservatives as evidence of the need to amend the U.S. Constitution to provide stronger protection of student religious expression in public schools.

The high court on Nov. 27 declined to hear the appeal of Settle v. Dickson County School Board (Case No. 95-507).

The case began when Dana Ramsey, Ms. Settle’s English teacher at Dickson County Junior High School, assigned students to write a research paper on any topic they chose. The teacher rejected Ms. Settle’s proposed topic, telling her that a paper on Jesus was “not an appropriate thing to do in a public school,” according to court documents.

Ms. Settle’s father met with the teacher and the school principal to protest, but Ms. Ramsey said she would not let the student write about Jesus because “that would be dealing specifically with her personal redeemer.”

The teacher later gave additional reasons why the topic was inappropriate. For example, she said Ms. Settle would not benefit from the research process by writing a paper on a topic with which she was already well acquainted.

She wrote about Jesus anyway, and received a grade of zero.

The family sued, but lost in federal district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The Sixth Circuit’s ruling last May affirmed the broad discretion of classroom teachers over student assignments.

“It is the essence of the teacher’s responsibility in the classroom to draw lines and make distinctions--in a word to encourage speech germane to the topic at hand,” the Sixth Circuit court said.

A Case in Point

Advocates of a religious-liberty amendment to the Constitution have cited the Settle case in testimony before Congress.

Michael W. McConnell, a University of Chicago law professor and an expert in church-state law, told the Senate Judiciary Committee in September that Ms. Ramsey’s reasons for rejecting a paper on Jesus were “uninformed, bigoted, or selectively applied.”

“When a research paper is otherwise appropriate, as this one was, the fact that it involves religion is not a legitimate basis for exclusion,” Mr. McConnell added.

In her Supreme Court appeal, Ms. Settle said that lower courts and school officials were “divided and badly confused” about how to handle such situations.

She argued that the Sixth Circuit court’s ruling runs counter to the guidelines on religious expression in public schools issued in August by Secretary of Education Richard W. Riley. (See Education Week, Aug. 2, 1995.)

“Students may express their beliefs about religion in the form of homework, artwork, and other written and oral assignments free of discrimination based on the religious content of their submissions,” one guideline states.

The Clinton administration declined to take a position on whether the high court should accept Ms. Settle’s appeal. Testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee in September, Assistant Attorney Walter E. Dellinger said the case did not present a clear-cut example of religious discrimination.

“The fact that a paper is on a religious topic does not exempt it from other pedagogical rules,” said Mr. Dellinger, who helped draft the administration’s religious-expression guidelines.

A version of this article appeared in the December 06, 1995 edition of Education Week as Court Declines To Hear Class-Assignment Case

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Budget & Finance Webinar
The ABCs of ESSER: How to Make the Most of Relief Funds Before They Expire
Join a diverse group of K-12 experts to learn how to leverage federal funds before they expire and improve student learning environments.
Content provided by Johnson Controls
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Modernizing Principal Support: The Road to More Connected and Effective Leaders
When principals are better equipped to lead, support, and maintain high levels of teaching and learning, outcomes for students are improved.
Content provided by BetterLesson
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated: April 27, 2022
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education Briefly Stated: April 6, 2022
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated: March 30, 2022
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
6 min read
Education Briefly Stated: March 16, 2022
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
7 min read