Education

Congress Approves Funding Measure To Keep Federal Programs Running

By Tom Mirga — October 05, 1983 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The Congress, racing against a midnight deadline last Friday, was expected to pass a temporary spending measure that would ensure continued funding for the Education Department and most other federal agencies through Nov. 15.

The House voted 261-to-160 to approve the measure, known as a continuing resolution, on Sept. 28. The Senate was expected to pass the spending bill the next day.

House and Senate conferees were expected to iron out minor differences between their bills and present the final product to President Reagan for his signature before the week’s end.

Passage of the bill was considered essential because as of late last week the Congress had failed to complete action on the regular education spending bill and eight other appropriation measures for the new fiscal year; fiscal 1983 funding for federal budgets ran out last Friday.

High-Cost Items

As of late last week, Mr. Reagan had not publicly indicated whether he would approve the bill. House and Senate leaders, however, went to great lengths to prevent the measure from being heavily amended with high-cost items in hopes of making it more attractive to the President.

One of those proposed amendments would have significantly increased the Education Department’s budget.

Education lobbyists had hoped that the House would consider the continuing resolution under a relatively “open” rule, which would have allowed Democratic leaders to raise fiscal 1984 education spending as much as $1.6 billion above levels set under the regular education spending bill approved on Sept. 22. (See Education Week, Sept. 28, 1983.)

Before approving the regular spending bill, the House adopted an amendment sponsored by House Majority Leader Jim Wright, Democrat of Texas, that added $200 million to the education-budget figures recommended by its Appropriations Committee a week earlier.

But even after the new money was added, the bill’s overall spending levels remained far below the amount that the Congress agreed to spend on education when it passed its first concurrent budget resolution last spring.

According to Congressional aides, Representative Wright and other House Democratic leaders wanted to set fiscal 1984 education spending closer to the $16.1-billion mark set under the budget resolution, which established broad spending targets for the entire federal government.

But Administration officials had told Representative William H. Natcher, Democrat of Kentucky and chairman of the Appropriations panel that oversees education, that Mr. Reagan would reject the bill if it contained the higher spending figures, the aides said. Representative Natcher, in turn, opposed the higher figures in order to improve the chances that the Congress would pass, and the President would sign, an appropriations bill for the Education Department for the first time since 1979.

The House aides said Representatives Wright and Carl D. Perkins, Democrat of Kentucky and chairman of the chamber’s Education and Labor Committee, hoped to raise the education-spending levels once again when the House voted on the continuing resolution. The Rules Committee prohibition on amendments to the bill, however, prevented them from attempting that maneuver.

Under the terms of the continuing resolution, federal programs are funded at rates of the lower of the levels in the House or Senate regular appropriations bills.

Under this system, education programs would be funded through Nov. 15 at the following annual rates:

Aid to Disadvantaged Children. The Chapter 1 program would be funded at $3.48 billion, up from $3.2 billion in fiscal 1983.

Block Grants. The Chapter 2 program would continue to be funded at its present level--$450 million.

Vocational and Adult Education. Vocational education would be funded at $731 million, up from $728.6 million. Adult education would receive $100 million, a $5-million increase.

Impact Aid. Payments for Category “A” students--those whose parents live and work on federal installations--would be set at $477 million, a $100-million increase. Category “B” payments--for children whose parents either live or work at such installations--would be funded at $58 million, approximately the same as in fiscal 1983.

Bilingual Education. Programs for language-minority students would receive $138.9 million, approximately $100,000 more than in fiscal 1983.

Education of the Handicapped. Programs for handicapped children would receive $1.195 billion, approximately the same amount as they received in fiscal 1983.

Educational Research. The National Institute of Education would receive $40 million, down from $55 million in fiscal 1983. The National Center for Education Statistics would receive $8.75 million, the same amount that it received in the last fiscal year.

The temporary spending bill also contained language that would allow the Secretary of Education to spend $20 million in leftover fiscal 1983 funds to help resolve the Chicago school-desegregation funding dispute.

Under the measure, the Secretary, Terrel H. Bell, would be allowed to use part of the $700 million left over from last year’s Guaranteed Student Loan fund to satisfy a federal court’s order requiring the government to make “every good- faith effort” to help finance the plan. The Congress passed a similar measure before its summer recess, but President Reagan vetoed it. (See Education Week, Aug. 14, 1983.)

The spending bill also temporarily extends the life of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which was scheduled to go out of business at the end of the fiscal year.

Congressional debate over President Reagan’s plan to replace three of the panel’s current members with people whose political views more closely match his own prevented the Senate from acting on a regular measure to reauthorize the commission.

A version of this article appeared in the October 05, 1983 edition of Education Week as Congress Approves Funding Measure To Keep Federal Programs Running

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Special Education Webinar
Integrating and Interpreting MTSS Data: How Districts Are Designing Systems That Identify Student Needs
Discover practical ways to organize MTSS data that enable timely, confident MTSS decisions, ensuring every student is seen and supported.
Content provided by Panorama Education
Artificial Intelligence Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: AI Could Be Your Thought Partner
How can educators prepare young people for an AI-powered workplace? Join our discussion on using AI as a cognitive companion.
Student Well-Being & Movement K-12 Essentials Forum How Schools Are Teaching Students Life Skills
Join this free virtual event to explore creative ways schools have found to seamlessly integrate teaching life skills into the school day.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Opinion The Opinions EdWeek Readers Care About: The Year’s 10 Most-Read
The opinion content readers visited most in 2025.
2 min read
Collage of the illustrations form the top 4 most read opinion essays of 2025.
Education Week + Getty Images
Education Quiz Did You Follow This Week’s Education News? Take This Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Education Quiz How Did the SNAP Lapse Affect Schools? Take This Weekly Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Education Quiz New Data on School Cellphone Bans: How Much Do You Know?
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read