Find your next job fast at the Jan. 28 Virtual Career Fair. Register now.
Education

California Voters Reject Pair of Ballot Measures

By Mary Ann Zehr — October 15, 2003 2 min read

Californians may have shaken up state politics by voting last week to boot Gov. Gray Davis from office, but they maintained the status quo when they voted on two ballot initiatives that many educators think would have hurt education.

Both measures—Proposition 53 and Proposition 54—were defeated on Oct. 7 by votes of 64 percent to 36 percent in favor, based on preliminary returns.

Proposition 54 would have greatly curbed public agencies’ collection and use of individual data on race or ethnicity. (“Outlook Uncertain for California’s Prop. 54,” Sept. 24, 2003.) Proposition 53 would have set aside money from the state’s general fund for building highways and other infrastructure.

Educators and education groups spent a considerable amount of money and energy fighting Proposition 54 in particular.

Dean E. Vogel, an executive officer of the California Teachers Association, said the $1.2 million that the National Education Association affiliate spent opposing the initiative was worth it. Proposition 54 would have prohibited schools from collecting the kind of information they need to address academic-achievement gaps and testing issues, he said.

“Tracking the ethnicity of students helps us make determinations of where we are doing well and where we are not,” he said.

Jack O’Connell, the state superintendent of public instruction, said he wrote op-ed pieces and met with groups “up and down the state” about how Proposition 54 would have made it harder to meet the needs of some student groups. “When somebody is aggressively trying to hurt the system, you play defense,” he said last week.

Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante, who had run as a candidate to replace Gov. Davis, a fellow Democrat, in the recall election on the same ballot, cited the failure of Proposition 54 as a “dramatic victory” in a speech while acknowledging his own defeat for the governorship by Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Mr. Bustamante spent more than $4 million out of his campaign war chest fighting the ballot measure. Gov.-elect Schwarzenegger also opposed Proposition 54.

Diane Schachterle, the campaign coordinator for the efforts to pass Proposition 54, attributed its loss to “distortion and misrepresentation” by its opponents.

She said that Ward Connerly, the member of the University of California board of regents who had sponsored Proposition 54, would likely try again in three or four years to get a similar initiative on the ballot.

‘Sleepy’ Issue

Speculating on the defeat of Proposition 53, Kevin R. Gordon, the executive director of the California Association of School Business Officials, said: “There wasn’t much information out there. If voters are confused about a ballot measure, they tend not to take a risk and vote no.” His group opposed the measure.

But Dan F. Pellissier, the chief of staff for Assemblyman Keith Stuart Richman, a Republican who co-sponsored Proposition 53 with Democratic Assemblyman Joe Canciamilla, gave another reason. “It was difficult to get the public’s attention on an issue as sleepy as infrastructure,” he said.

Proposition 53 would have taken 1 percent out of the state’s general fund for infrastructure, starting in 2006, and steadily increased the percentage to 3 percent.

School groups differed over whether “infrastructure” included school buildings. They feared the measure would indirectly put a greater strain on K-12 state aid.

Related Tags:

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Branding Matters. Learn From the Pros Why and How
Learn directly from the pros why K-12 branding and marketing matters, and how to do it effectively.
Content provided by EdWeek Top School Jobs
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
How to Make Learning More Interactive From Anywhere
Join experts from Samsung and Boxlight to learn how to make learning more interactive from anywhere.
Content provided by Samsung
Teaching Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table With Education Week: How Educators Can Respond to a Post-Truth Era
How do educators break through the noise of disinformation to teach lessons grounded in objective truth? Join to find out.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Special Education Teachers
Lancaster, PA, US
Lancaster Lebanon IU 13
Speech Therapists
Lancaster, PA, US
Lancaster Lebanon IU 13
BASE Program Site Director
Thornton, CO, US
Adams 12 Five Star Schools
Director of Information Technology
Montpelier, Vermont
Washington Central UUSD

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: January 13, 2021
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read