Opinion
Special Education Letter to the Editor

Proposed Education Cuts Hurt Special Education

December 08, 2015 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

Now that an overall budget deal has been reached, adding billions of dollars to the federal budget for fiscal years 2016 and 2017, we urge Congress to reject proposed cuts for education and special education research, and provide these programs with a much-needed funding increase.

As members of the education and special-education research communities, we work every day to design and evaluate better strategies to improve academic achievement and social outcomes for all students, including those with and without disabilities, English-language learners, and students from low-income families.

The impact of high-quality education research isn’t limited to university halls and Washington think tanks. Research, and the evidence it produces, has led directly to better outcomes for students, parents, teachers, and school leaders; and research helps policymakers use limited resources more effectively.

Despite the importance of research to improving the achievement of all students and ensuring cost-effectiveness in federal education spending, members of the House Appropriations Committee have proposed slashing the budget for the Institute of Education Sciences by nearly $164 million next fiscal year. That amount would include an $86 million cut to the Research, Development, and Dissemination line item—the largest program under the IES—and a separate cut of more than $18 million to the program for special education research.

While the proposed cuts would have a devastating impact on the education research community—decreasing research funding to levels not seen in 20 years—the biggest losers would be students, especially those who already face barriers to academic achievement.

We believe it is imperative that members of Congress and the Obama Administration ensure that our federal budget reflects the national importance we place on educational equity and opportunity for all young people. Restoring funding for critical education research is an essential first step.

Elizabeth Talbott

President

Division for Research

Council for Exceptional Children

Associate Professor, Special Education

University of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago, Ill.

Glenn Good

Co-Chair

Learning and Education Academic Research Network

Dean

College of Education

University of Florida

Gainesville, Fla.

Don Heller

Co-Chair

Learning and Education Academic Research Network

Dean

College of Education

Michigan State University

East Lansing, Mich.

Donna Wiseman

Co-Chair

Learning and Education Academic Research Network

Dean

College of Education

University of Maryland

College Park, Md.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the December 09, 2015 edition of Education Week as Proposed Education Cuts Hurt Special Education

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
The Assessment Trust Crisis: How to Measure Learning in the Age of AI
AI is reshaping learning. Is assessment keeping up? Join this webinar to explore how to measure student thinking, not just right answers.
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
From Student Trends to Counselor Action: Turning Insight Into Impact
Find out what is changing in how students approach planning for life after graduation and how schools can help.
Content provided by PowerSchool
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
McKinney-Vento Transportation Strategies: Managing Cost & Protecting Access
Explore McKinney-Vento transportation strategies to manage costs, respond quickly to changing needs, and protect student access.
Content provided by HopSkipDrive

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Special Education How AI Tools Halved This District's IEP Prep Time
Using AI in special education requires thoughtful training and privacy protections, experts say.
8 min read
Preschool teacher Melissa Mowbray works with AI on her laptop at Academic Magnet High School during the Charleston County School District Charleston Educator Symposium on July 22, 2026 in North Charleston, S.C.
Preschool teacher Melissa Mowbray works with artificial intelligence on her laptop at Academic Magnet High School during the Charleston County School District's Charleston Educator Symposium on July 22, 2026 in North Charleston, S.C. Some school districts are employing AI to help craft special education students' individualized education programs, but experts warn that doing so could run afoul of student privacy laws without the proper guardrails.
Mic Smith/AP
Special Education Q&A How New Federal Guidance on Disability Could Impact K-12 Special Education
New federal DOJ guidance deemphasizing independent living skills could affect special education transition plans.
4 min read
Elaine Wilson, left, and Lois Curtis are shown in this April 10, 1999 file photo. States may have to place people with mental disabilities in homelike settings if they can fare just as well there as in state hospitals, the Supreme Court said Tuesday, June 22, 1999. The decision did not provide the final word in the legal battle of the two Georgia women who sued Georgia to get out of a state mental hospital in Atlanta. Elaine Wilson and Lois Curtis had been approved for community-based care but faced long waiting lists. Now in group homes, both women attended the Supreme Court arguments for their case in April.
Plaintiffs Elaine Wilson and Lois Curtis, shown here on April 10, 1999, during their Supreme Court battle, were the two Georgia women whose lawsuit established the landmark <i>Olmstead</i> decision requiring community-based care for adults with disabilities. The U.S. Department of Justice in July issued new guidance that said it will no longer rely upon the <i>Olmstead</i> decision in its enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
John Bazemore/AP
Special Education Little Chefs, Big Gains: Students With Disabilities Cook Toward Independence
Cooking helps the elementary students learn counting, build fine motor skills, and practice emotional regulation.
3 min read
Students get waffle mix for a chicken and Waffles cooking day in the classroom of Gabrielle Carpenter at the Daniel Webster School in Indianapolis, Friday, Oct. 2, 2026.
Students prepare waffle mix in Gabrielle Carpenter's special education classroom on Oct. 2, 2026, at Daniel Webster School 46 in Indianapolis. Carpenter uses the biweekly cooking lessons to teach the students independence, along with skills like counting and measuring.
AJ Mast for Education Week
Special Education Cameras in Special Ed. Classrooms: Safety Measure or Privacy Invasion?
Cameras don't address insufficient teacher training, inadequate staffing, and poor behavior policies.
7 min read
A photo showing a CCTV security eye style camera monitoring students in a classroom. The classroom is blurred in the background while the camera is in focus.
iStock/Getty