Parents Drop Suit Over Vouchers for Students With Disabilities
A group of Oklahoma parents has dropped a lawsuit against four school districts over private school tuition for their children, who have disabilities, leaving a court challenge over the constitutionality of the state vouchers in question.
Oklahoma’s Lindsey Nicole Henry Scholarships for Students with Disabilities Act became law in June 2010, allowing parents to send children to private schools using public money. Initially, the law required school districts to reimburse parents for tuition. Parents claimed some districts refused to do so and sued the Broken Arrow, Jenks, Tulsa, and Union districts over their tuition.
Two of the districts countersued the parents, challenging the constitutionality of the vouchers.
The state legislature has revised the law, charging the state department of education with issuing checks to parents rather than school districts.
That change led the parents to drop their suit, said Eric Rassbach, a lawyer with the Becket Fund for Religious Liberties, a nonprofit, Washington-based law firm that represents people of all faiths in litigation, often against government entities.
Several other states, including Arizona and Florida, have voucher programs for students with disabilities. Many of the schools accepting vouchers in Oklahoma were religion-based.
“We got what we wanted from the amendments the legislature made,” Mr. Rassbach said. He said the parents using vouchers wanted a better education for their children, not necessarily a religious one.
“From my clients’ perspective, some of the districts were just warehousing the kids,” he said.
J. Douglas Mann, a lawyer for the four school districts, told the Tulsa World that he views the parents dropping their lawsuit as a victory. But he said the districts’ lawsuit continues in state court and he is confident that the law’s constitutionality will be decided there.
Mr. Rassbach wasn’t convinced, however, that the law’s constitutionality will be decided by the districts’ suit, or that their case will even progress in court.
“If the school districts really and truly want to find out about the constitutionality of this program, they need to put up or shut up and sue the state,” he said.
Vol. 31, Issue 12, Page 20
Get more stories and free e-newsletters!
- Director of Professional Services
- Engaging Schools, Inc., Cambridge, MA
- Multiple Vacancies
- Hazard, Young, Attea & Associates, Multiple Locations
- Director of Schools (Superintendent)
- Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools, Nashville, TN
- Supervisor of Mathematics
- Quakertown Community School District, PA
- Deputy Superintendent of Education Support
- West Virginia Department of Education, Charleston, WV