Ed-Tech Policy

‘Promising’ Computer Programs Developed for Writing Instruction

By George Neill — May 05, 1982 8 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A group of “promising” computer software programs was the focus of a two-day meeting this month on the use of computers in writing instruction sponsored by the Southwest Regional Laboratory (swrl). Officials billed the gathering as “the first of its kind ever held.”

In describing the programs, conference speakers also discussed with their audience, composed mostly of secondary- and postsecondary-level faculty members, the current status of the development of microcomputer software for teaching writing to students of all grade levels--from preschool through college.

Although the speakers agreed that the use of microcomputers is “just at the beginning stage” and that much of the software now available is “very poor,” they noted that some existing programs offer “exciting options in the tough job of teaching writing.”

Following is a brief description of the eight software programs based on the speakers’ comments, particularly those of the keynote speaker, Robert Shostak, professor of English at Florida International University.

Writer’s Workbench is a creation of scientists at the Bell Laboratories in Murray Hill, N.J., and offers perhaps the most advanced editing system available today, according to Mr. Shostak. The 32-program system requires a minicomputer; it corrects spelling, punctuation, and grammar. It also analyzes style and provides feedback to the student on sentence length, cliches, wordiness, and jargon.

“The program literally suggests editorial changes to the writer,” Mr. Shostak said. It searches a text for stylistic breaches and suggests alternatives. For example, it picks up the use of split infinitives or forced expressions ... and offers specific alternatives to improve the text. In addition, it gives the writer the readability level of his writing sample, offers suggestions on sentence length and sentence types; and provides the percentage of passive verb phrases. “Writer’s Workbench” has been completed, but it is yet to be released; it will operate on a Digital Equipment Company minicomputer.

Story Maker was rated by Mr. Shostak as “exceptionally promising for teaching the first stage of the composing process--prewriting--in the elementary school.” The program encourages children to concentrate on the whole test instead of emphasizing drills with letters, words, or phrases, he said. The child is guided to consider the logical flow of narrative and the role of examples in an explanation, and is engaged in a creative story-making exercise which involves the choice of options from already-written story segments. After all the decisions have been made, the child has produced a complete story which he or she can read and share with other students.

The child maintains control of the creative process while the computer handles the bookkeeping details, according to Mr. Shostak. Through simple commands, the computer presents structured options for the child, keeps track of the choices, and displays and prints the complete story when the activity is finished.

Since the program includes a printing capability, hard copy can be produced for further activities planned by the teacher.

“Story Maker” programming was developed by Andee Rubin of Bolt, Beranek, and Newman Inc., Boston. It operates on an Apple II microcomputer and will become available within a month. Price: $30 for two disks.

The Burns Program for the prewriting stage was developed by Major Hugh Burns, a professor of English at the U.S. Air Force Academy, for his college-level students.

The program was said to provide substantial help to students in generating new ideas, facts, opinions, and arguments for the subjects they are going to write about.

It uses a set of questions based on Aristotle’s “enthymemes” (syllogisms in which one premise is implicit) to engage the students in a Socratic dialogue that can last for 40 minutes. When students leave the computer lab, they will have more than 20 pages of this computer-assisted dialogue to help them in their writing project.

Mr. Shostak said the program is promising “because Major Burns’s findings suggest that students can be encouraged to increase the number and sophistication of their ideas. ... Any computer-assisted instruction which can improve students’ skills of inquiry will be welcomed by teachers of composition.” The software will be available shortly for microcomputers.

Compupoem, for teaching the composing process, was developed by S. Stephen Marcus, assistant director of the South Coast Writing Project and professor of English at the University of California at Santa Barbara. The program asks students for choices, provides advice to encourage them to think about what they want to say, and even provides the opportunity to see instant reproductions of their poems in different structural formats.

Used by students from the fourth-grade to the college level, by graduate students, and by teachers, Compupoem stresses planning, coherence, structure, and revision. It also emphasizes basic parts of speech and provides advice on using nouns, verbs, adverbs, and adjectives. The program’s disk works on an Apple II (48K) microcomputer and may be obtained for $15.95 from Mr. Marcus, English Department, University of California at Santa Barbara, Calif. 93106.

The Electric Poet was developed by Edmund Skellings, director of the International Institute for Creative Communication at Florida International University. It “marries” technology and poetry to produce a poem that is viewed rather than read or heard. The poem may be seen in various colors, and it may even appear to move as it is presented on the screen, according to Mr. Shostak. He noted that “many possibilities exist for developing color-coded writing models which could be visually taken apart and put together again instantly by the computer.”

This approach, he said, “offers a powerful tool for the teaching of writing.” For more information on “Electric Poet” contact: Mr. Skellings, International Institute for Creative Communication, Florida International University, Miami, Fla.

The Wisher Programs. Two programs for teaching the last stage of the writing process--rewriting and editing--have been developed by Robert Wisher of the Navy Personnel Research and Development Center in San Diego.

The first program leads students through a procedure for organizing preconstructed sentences into a meaningful paragraph. After the student has organized the paragraph, he can edit it in a variety of ways to clarify meaning and provide stylistic effects.

This is accomplished by a series of “prompts” that allow optional positioning of the topic sentence, placement of short sentences before longer ones, deletion of unimportant sentences, and the insertion of a single sentence written by the student.

The second program assists students in combining phrases into sentences. The student can see immediately how phrases can be combined to form clauses and how clauses can can be combined to form sentences. There is also an option built into the program to write a sentence in a particular style.

R.S.V.P. (Response System with Variable Prescriptions), to assist students in the prewriting and editing process, has been developed by Kamala Anandam, a faculty member at Miami-Dade Community College, Miami.

Described by Mr. Shostak as “very sophisticated,” the system allows teachers to evaluate and respond to each student’s writing. In the first step of the process, the teacher reads the essays and places them in one of four levels--Primary, Basic, Intermediate, and Advanced. In the second step is the teacher identifies specific problems to be pointed out to the students. In the third step, the teacher indicates on a computer card the kind of feedback the student is to receive.

The computer then provides a personal letter for each student. The feedback or critique is written to correspond with the student’s writing-skill level, which was determined by the teacher in the first step. The critique consists of written prescriptions that reinforce what the student accomplished and suggest ways to avoid the same errors in future assignments.

In addition, rsvp generates individualized-study/exercise assignments, keeps a record of the student’s errors on each assignment, and provides a status report for the teacher. Available now for larger computers, rsvp is expected to be available shortly for microcomputers.

Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium (mecc) is one of the largest sources of microcomputer software on language arts (and many other subjects). The state-supported organization sells its software disks in most states and in many foreign countries.

mecc offers three microcomputer programs designed to help elementary-school teachers teach language arts. The first program permits teachers to enter lists of spelling words into the computer’s program. These lists are used by the computer for programs entitled “Spell,” which drills students on spelling; “Mix-up,” which presents the words in mixed-up order; and “Word Find,” which creates a puzzle for the teacher to duplicate.

The second program contains five lessons that both teach and require practice in the usage of the prefixes un-, re-, dis-, pre-, in-.

The third program offers drills on alphabet sequence and on the initial sounds of the word, and a concentration game to reinforce skills.

The mecc language-arts library offers software for prekindergarten through higher education and operates on both Apple II and Atari 400 and 800 microcomputers. The cost: $10 per disk in Minnesota and $30 per disk outside Minnesota. The software may be obtained from mecc, 2520 Broadway Dr., St. Paul, Minn. 55113.

Software may also be ordered through two distributors that permit the return of software “for any reason, within 30 days” after it was ordered: K-12 MicroMedia, P.O. Box 17, Valley Cottage, N.Y. 10989 (250 programs from 50 producers) and Scholastic Inc., 904 Sylvan Ave., Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 07632 (more than 200 programs).

A version of this article appeared in the May 05, 1982 edition of Education Week as ‘Promising’ Computer Programs Developed for Writing Instruction

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Unlocking Success for Struggling Adolescent Readers
The Science of Reading transformed K-3 literacy. Now it's time to extend that focus to students in grades 6 through 12.
Content provided by STARI
Jobs Regional K-12 Virtual Career Fair: DMV
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
CTE for All: How One School Board Builds Future-Ready Students
Discover how CPSB uses partnerships and high-quality digital resources to build equitable, future-ready CTE pathways for every student.
Content provided by Cengage School

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Ed-Tech Policy Nation's 2nd Largest District Moves to Limit Student Screen Use
LAUSD will limit classroom screen time, emphasizing quality learning over device use.
Photos of board members decorate the walls inside LAUSD headquarters Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, in Los Angeles.
Photos of board members decorate the walls inside LAUSD headquarters Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, in Los Angeles. The Los Angeles Board of Education recently voted to limit screen time in classrooms.
Damian Dovarganes/AP
Ed-Tech Policy Letter to the Editor Don’t Ban Phones, Limit Them
Phones can be useful tools, says a high school student.
1 min read
Education Week opinion letters submissions
Gwen Keraval for Education Week
Ed-Tech Policy Welcome to the 'Funky' Politics of the Tech in Schools Debate
The Trump administration is cheerleading AI in schools as GOP lawmakers crack down on ed tech.
9 min read
In this Oct. 5, 1980, file photo, Nancy Armstrong, a teacher at the Marshall elementary school in Harrisburg, Pa., assists her students in the use of computers to aid them in their studies. Today’s grandparents may have fond memories of the “good old days,” but history tells us that adults have worried about their kids’ fascination with new-fangled entertainment and technology since the days of dime novels, radio, the first comic books and rock n’ roll.
In this Oct. 5, 1980, file photo, Nancy Armstrong, a teacher at Marshall Elementary School in Harrisburg, Pa., assists her students in the use of computers to aid them in their learning. The debate about how much time students should spend using technology to learn has been around for decades, but is now heating up in Congress and state legislatures and creating some unlikely allies.
Paul Vathis/AP
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Ed-Tech Policy Whitepaper
Solving Inconsistent Phone Policy Enforcement: Teacher Insights
This white paper helps school leaders make informed decisions by highlighting teachers’ phone enforcement experiences and how technology ...
Content provided by TRUCE Family