Special Report
IT Management

Lack of Clear Standards, and Money, Trips Up District Tech Leaders on Interoperability

By Holly Kurtz — October 30, 2018 4 min read
BRIC ARCHIVE

When they are talking about the challenges related to improving software interoperability in school districts, ed-tech leaders say their top problem is a lack of widely agreed-upon technical standards.

That’s according to more than 300 ed-tech leaders who responded to a fall 2018 online survey conducted by the Consortium for School Networking—which represents the nation’s chief technology officers. The survey was conducted in partnership with the Education Week Research Center.

Twenty-three percent of the leaders surveyed say that the lack of common standards is “extremely challenging” when it comes to improving data interoperability in their school districts. An additional 23 percent find it “very challenging.”

“I think clarity in the standards space is essential,” said Erin Mote of Project Unicorn, an initiative to promote interoperability in K-12 schools. “Part of what needs to happen is improving understanding of which standard does what, based on different use cases, because there’s not one standard for everything.”

The survey results suggest that many district technology leaders haven’t settled on a single, off-the-shelf solution to all of their data integration challenges. Or they at least aren’t aware of how many existing options might serve their needs.

Enlarge Chart

Experts say K-12 leaders should at least become aware of the various solutions that have gained traction, and what they can and can’t help with. The Ed-Fi data standard for interoperability, for example, consists of a set of technical rules that allow disparate data systems to connect with one another. Another standard is OneRoster, created by a Florida-based group of vendors, districts, and others known as the IMS Global Learning Consortium. Then there’s Clever, a company that charges vendors to manage the flow of information between schools and digital content providers.

Budgets, Tagging Are Concerns

The survey was conducted this fall among individuals who were their school districts’ most senior technology official. Only one response was tabulated per-district.

The results show that the budget constraints are the second-biggest interoperability concern after standards. Eighteen percent of ed-tech leaders surveyed say finances pose an “extremely challenging” barrier to improving system-to-system communication.

Poor tagging or categorization of digital content is the third-largest constraint. Fourteen percent say this concern is “extremely challenging.”

A number of worries about interoperability are more pronounced in lower-income districts, while others are bigger concerns in more affluent areas.

For example, the average district poverty rate among leaders who are extremely concerned about a lack of staff expertise is 53 percent. By comparison, the poverty rate is lower, 39 percent, among leaders whose efforts to improve interoperability are not at all hampered by staff expertise levels. It is possible that more impoverished areas are less able to attract as many qualified tech-focused staff.

About This Report

This Education Week examination of school districts’ pursuit of interoperability is the first of three special reports focused on the needs of K-12 district technology leaders, including chief technology officers. Each report in the series features exclusive results of a new, nationally representative survey of CTOs, conducted by the Consortium for School Networking, which represents K-12 district technology officials.

Parent resistance to interoperability is a bigger challenge in districts with more affluent populations. Among leaders who say they are extremely challenged by parent resistance, the school system poverty rate averages 38 percent. Among leaders who are not at all worried about parent pushback, the district poverty rate is 46 percent.

Help With State, Federal Reporting

In addition to posing questions about interoperability-related challenges, the survey asked about the degree to which improving interoperability could lead to 11 different desirable outcomes.

Leaders are most likely to report that improving interoperability will make state and federal reporting more efficient: More than half (56 percent) completely agree that better interoperability will help them attain this objective.

Leaders in low-poverty districts are less likely to say that enhancing interoperability will streamline state and federal reporting. Among leaders who completely disagree that improving interoperability will have this effect, the average poverty rate is 26 percent. The rate is 43 percent for those who completely agree.

Interoperability: Tips to Consider, Mistakes to Avoid

District chief technology officers who are trying to implement interoperability offered suggestions for peers in other school systems.

Click here to read their seven pieces of advice.

This is a trend: Leaders in lower-poverty districts are more skeptical than their peers from higher-poverty districts that interoperability will help attain eight of the 11 objectives listed on the survey.

In addition, rural leaders are less likely than their urban and suburban counterparts to completely agree that interoperability will help them reach each of the 11 objectives listed on the survey.

Takeaway: While K-12 ed-tech leaders see a lack of common standards as the top barrier to achieving interoperability, they are also worried about budgets and tagging/categorization. Streamlined state and federal reporting is the most frequently-expected outcome of enhanced interoperability, with leaders from rural and more affluent districts expressing less confidence that improving interoperability will improve a variety of district operations.

Holly Yettick Kurtz
Holly Kurtz is the director of the Education Week Research Center, which frequently surveys ed-tech leaders as well as other district administrators and teachers. The center also produces analyses for Education Week’s special report, Quality Counts, and for its membership service EdWeek Market Brief. Follow Holly on Twitter @HollyYettick, and e-mail her at hyettick@epe.org.

Events

School & District Management Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: Strategies & Tips for Complex Decision-Making
Schools are working through the most disruptive period in the history of modern education, facing a pandemic, economic problems, social justice issues, and rapid technological change all at once. But even after the pandemic ends,
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Education Funding Webinar
From Crisis to Opportunity: How Districts Rebuild to Improve Student Well-Being
K-12 leaders discuss the impact of federal funding, prioritizing holistic student support, and how technology can help.
Content provided by Salesforce.org
Classroom Technology Online Summit Technology & the Pandemic: What’s Next for Schools?
When it comes to the use of technology, what’s next for schools?  Join the discussion to tackle issues surrounding this important question.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

IT Management Schools Are Flush With Stimulus Money. Will They Waste It on Unproven Technology?
Districts are throwing billions of dollars at ed tech that could be ineffective, underutilized, and come with hidden long-term costs.
8 min read
Conceptual finance image of large group of flying money of American one hundred dollar bills in binary coded tunnel
iStock/Getty Images Plus
IT Management Goodbye, Adobe Flash: What Educators Need to Know
Programs that run on Adobe Flash will no longer work on any devices or browsers after Jan. 12.
2 min read
Image shows laptop computer with Adobe Flash headstone
F.Sheehan/Education Week + Getty
IT Management 4 Big Cybersecurity Priorities for Schools: Training, Purchasing, Monitoring, and Budgeting
A survey of 513 K-12 technology leaders on how they are dealing with the latest cybersecurity challenges showed that 63 percent are working on training end users.
4 min read
BRIC ARCHIVE
Getty
IT Management Leader To Learn From Making Technology Work for Schools
As the technology director in the Vail School District in Vail, Ariz., Mark Breen’s tech savvy and deep understanding of what principals need has simplified the technology educators need to do their jobs and freed up time for them to focus on students. He is recognized as a 2020 Leader To Learn From.
7 min read