Ed-Tech Policy

Houghton Mifflin’s Sale to Software Maker Reflects Trend

By Rhea R. Borja — December 01, 2006 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

In a move reflecting the rise of new media over old, the education software maker Riverdeep Holdings Limited announced last week its $3.4 billion purchase of the Houghton Mifflin Co., among the United States’ oldest and largest education publishers.

The 174-year-old Boston-based textbook company will merge with the 11-year-old Dublin, Ireland-based software company under the name Houghton Mifflin Riverdeep Group PLC, when the deal becomes final by year’s end, a Houghton Mifflin spokesman said. The companies have combined annual revenues of $1.4 billion and earnings before taxes and interest of $392 million.

“We are excited about … the ability to capitalize on the convergence of print and digital platforms,” said Barry O’Callaghan, Riverdeep’s chief executive officer.

See Also

The convergence between digital and traditional print publishing was discussed at the Software and Information Industry Association’s annual Ed Tech Business Forum, held Nov. 27 in New York City. For more, read the related story,

Ed. Tech. Executives Gather to Brainstorm How They Can Serve Schools Better

He is also the executive chairman of HM Rivergroup PLC, the new company formed to engineer the acquisition and merger. The company bought the traditional publishing concern from the private investment firms of Thomas H. Lee Partners, Bain Capital Partners, both based in Boston, and the New York City-based Blackstone Group.

The takeover of the venerable American firm, which has published such great American writers as Mark Twain and Henry David Thoreau, by a young, foreign, and smaller technology concern is a bold move, said industry analyst Trace Urdan, a managing director with Signal Hill, a San Francisco investment bank.

“This is like the minnow swallowing the whale,” he said.

It is also risky, Mr. Urdan added. The new company will shoulder $1.6 billion in net debt included in the $3.4 billion sale. Other companies have taken the same gamble and lost, he said.

Houghton Mifflin’s net sales in K-12 publishing fell 2.3 percent in the first nine months of 2006 compared with the same period in 2005, to about $780 million from $798 million. The company’s operating income for K-12 publishing rose 3.4 percent between those periods, from $186.8 million to $193.4 million, documents show.

Before the announcement, it was widely known in the industry that privately held Houghton Mifflin was planning to sell company shares to the public in the hope of raising $1 billion, which would reap benefits for its owners. The firms bought the company from the French media conglomerate Vivendi Universal SA in 2002 for $615 million in equity and $1 billion in assumed debt.

A Houghton Mifflin spokesman would not comment on the possibility of a potential initial public offering of company shares.

“The conventional wisdom is that they’re setting themselves up for failure,” Mr. Urdan said of Riverdeep. “But if they can crack the code and have the same sort of win rate in [textbook] sales … and do it digitally at a much lower cost, then the deal will be successful.”

The convergence extends to the management of the new company. Houghton Mifflin’s president, chairman, and CEO, Tony Lucki, is a former member of the Riverdeep board of directors. Under the merger, the publishing concern will remain in Boston, and Mr. Lucki, will become the vice chairman of the new company.

Houghton Mifflin’s products include the Language of Literature anthology series for middle and high school students through its McDougal Littell division, which the company acquired in 1994, and the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills through its Riverside Publishing division. Riverdeep’s products include Reader Rabbit and Destination Success, its online math and reading series.

Rise of Web

The sale of Houghton Mifflin is one more sign of the transition from print to Web-based curricula among publishers, experts say. Increasingly, publishers are embracing technology companies—and vice versa—to offer a blend of print and digital curricula that K-12 schools want, said Jay Diskey, the executive director of the school division of the Association of American Publishers, a Washington-based trade association.

Mergers-and-acquisitions activity in recent years in the education and reference market has been robust, with the London-based textbook publisher Pearson PLC leading the charge.

Earlier this year, for instance, Pearson won a $70 million contract in California to provide history curricula via digital books, videos, assessment, and interactive-learning tools to at least 1.5 million elementary school students. The company estimates that almost 50 percent of all K-5 students in the state will use those online products.

The Association of American Publishers rewrote its mission statement recently to omit “textbook.” Some of the group’s 300 members have never published traditional print books, such as digital publishers Learning.com, based in Portland, Ore., and Lakewood, N.J.-based Achieve3000.

Sales of digital instructional content by education publishers rose more than 52 percent in the United States from 2001 to 2005, from $152 million to $234.4 million, according to the AAP.

“ ‘Textbook’ no longer describes this industry,” Mr. Diskey said. “For a long time, the technology industry pursued its goals … separately from the publishing market. But there really has been a convergence.”

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the December 06, 2006 edition of Education Week as Houghton Mifflin’s Sale to Software Maker Reflects Trend


Commenting has been disabled on edweek.org effective Sept. 8. Please visit our FAQ section for more details. To get in touch with us visit our contact page, follow us on social media, or submit a Letter to the Editor.


Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
What’s Next for Teaching and Learning? Key Trends for the New School Year
The past 18 months changed the face of education forever, leaving teachers, students, and families to adapt to unprecedented challenges in teaching and learning. As we enter the third school year affected by the pandemic—and
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Webinar
How Data and Digital Curriculum Can Drive Personalized Instruction
As we return from an abnormal year, it’s an educator’s top priority to make sure the lessons learned under adversity positively impact students during the new school year. Digital curriculum has emerged from the pandemic
Content provided by Kiddom
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Leadership for Racial Equity in Schools and Beyond
While the COVID-19 pandemic continues to reveal systemic racial disparities in educational opportunity, there are revelations to which we can and must respond. Through conscientious efforts, using an intentional focus on race, school leaders can
Content provided by Corwin

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Ed-Tech Policy Reported Essay Remote Learning Isn’t Just for Emergencies
Schools were less prepared for digital learning than they thought they were.
5 min read
Conceptual Illustration
Pep Montserrat for Education Week
Ed-Tech Policy Opinion Why Are We Turning Our Backs on Remote Learning?
Neither the detractors nor defenders of remote learning are fully in the right, argues one superintendent.
Theresa Rouse
5 min read
Illustration of girl working on computer at home.
Getty
Ed-Tech Policy Letter to the Editor Using E-Rate to Address the Homework Gap
The FCC's E-rate program can provide relief to many families, says this letter author from the Internet Society.
1 min read
Ed-Tech Policy Q&A Acting FCC Chair: The 'Homework Gap' Is an 'Especially Cruel' Reality During the Pandemic
Under the new leadership of Jessica Rosenworcel, the FCC is exploring broadening the E-Rate to cover home-connectivity needs.
5 min read
Internet connectivity doesn't reach all the houses
Vanessa Solis/Education Week and iStock/Getty