Ed-Tech Policy

Eye on Technology: Soviet Educator Looks at Computers, Listens for Ideas

By Peter Schmidt — March 22, 1989 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Nikolai D. Nikandrov sat in the computer laboratory of St. Stephen’s, a private high school here, and watched with fascination as the instructor demonstrated a simple Apple computer system used by students.

Computers, more than anything else, seemed to capture the high-ranking Soviet education official’s attention as he toured the Episcopal school’s classrooms this month during the first day of a three-week visit to the United States. The trip is being sponsored by Educators for Social Responsibility, a Cambridge, Mass., teachers’ association that deals with issues of the nuclear age.

As General Secretary of the Presidium of the Soviet Academy of Pedagogical Sciences--the highest educational post a member of the U.S.S.R.'s national teaching academy can attain--Mr. Nikandrov said he strongly believed that computers and computer-literate students could significantly advance “perestroika,” the Soviet leader Mikhail S. Gorbachev’s attempt to restructure that country’s economy for greater productivity.

But as the owner of a personal computer he described as basic and obsolete, Mr. Nikandrov said he was also keenly aware of how far his country is from having the equipment needed to meet its closely linked goals of educational and economic reform.

Mr. Nikandrov, who came to the United States to speak at Harvard University and other sites and to study American schools, said Soviet educators increasingly have been looking to the American educational system as a model for their reforms.

But the Soviet system has a long way to go before its schools will resemble those in the United States, Mr. Nikandrov said. For the time being, he added, he and most other Soviet educators are looking to perestroika as the best hope to spur both economic revival and increased spending on schools, which are completely dependent on support from the central government.

“There is a direct connection between the amount of money put into education and the effectiveness of education,” Mr. Nikandrov said. “Much more money should be pumped into schools.”

“But if perestroika fails, that money is just not available,” he added. “It is as simple as that.”

The reverse is also true, however, according to the Soviet official: If school reform fails, then the population will be less able to contribute to perestroika--already under pressure from an entrenched bureaucracy and the resistance of citizens who cling to the old ways.

To highlight the disparity between Soviet educators’ hopes for reform and the reality of the Soviet economy, Mr. Nikandrov pointed to the limited success his country has had in introducing classroom computers.

Soviet officials had planned to place 500,000 computers in the country’s 130,000 schools during the five-year period ending in 1990, Mr. Nikandrov said. But now it appears they will barely reach half that goal. The educator also noted that many of the computers being installed in schools are unreliable or obsolete, largely because of his country’s inability to acquire foreign computers or the technology necessary to build good computers at home.

But the winds of change are blowel10ling through the schools nonetheless, Mr. Nikandrov asserted, noting, for example, that “in the humanities, people discuss just about anything they want to discuss.”

Also being considered, but not yet implemented, are proposals to give school administrators more leeway in determining school schedules and budgets, and to give students more freedom in choosing their courses.

And more and more schools are being allowed to experiment with changes in curriculum, teaching styles, and school organization, Mr. Nikandrov said. Variations of such American concepts as magnet schools and merit pay have been given thought as well, he noted.

Mr. Nikandrov said many of the educational reforms under consideration have been advocated by the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences and its presidium for a decade or more, “but they were not heeded by those who had the power or the money.”

But the academy now is being given a much stronger advisory position by the educational establishment, he said, and is likely to play a growing role in reform.

A version of this article appeared in the March 22, 1989 edition of Education Week as Eye on Technology: Soviet Educator Looks at Computers, Listens for Ideas

Events

Jobs Regional K-12 Virtual Career Fair: DMV
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
Making AI Work in Schools: From Experimentation to Purposeful Practice
AI use is expanding in schools. Learn how district leaders can move from experimentation to coordinated, systemwide impact.
Content provided by Frontline Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being & Movement Webinar
Building Resilient Students: Leadership Beyond the Classroom
How can schools build resilient, confident students? Join education leaders to explore new strategies for leadership and well-being.
Content provided by IMG Academy

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Ed-Tech Policy Schools Have Another Year to Make Websites Accessible. Why That Matters
People with disabilities say inaccessible online content is a barrier to participating in public life.
4 min read
A gif with web accessible icons around a computer screen with a magnifying glass.
Shivendu Jauhari/Getty
Ed-Tech Policy Nation's 2nd Largest District Moves to Limit Student Screen Use
LAUSD will limit classroom screen time, emphasizing quality learning over device use.
Photos of board members decorate the walls inside LAUSD headquarters Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, in Los Angeles.
Photos of board members decorate the walls inside LAUSD headquarters Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, in Los Angeles. The Los Angeles Board of Education recently voted to limit screen time in classrooms.
Damian Dovarganes/AP
Ed-Tech Policy Letter to the Editor Don’t Ban Phones, Limit Them
Phones can be useful tools, says a high school student.
1 min read
Education Week opinion letters submissions
Gwen Keraval for Education Week
Ed-Tech Policy Welcome to the 'Funky' Politics of the Tech in Schools Debate
The Trump administration is cheerleading AI in schools as GOP lawmakers crack down on ed tech.
9 min read
In this Oct. 5, 1980, file photo, Nancy Armstrong, a teacher at the Marshall elementary school in Harrisburg, Pa., assists her students in the use of computers to aid them in their studies. Today’s grandparents may have fond memories of the “good old days,” but history tells us that adults have worried about their kids’ fascination with new-fangled entertainment and technology since the days of dime novels, radio, the first comic books and rock n’ roll.
In this Oct. 5, 1980, file photo, Nancy Armstrong, a teacher at Marshall Elementary School in Harrisburg, Pa., assists her students in the use of computers to aid them in their learning. The debate about how much time students should spend using technology to learn has been around for decades, but is now heating up in Congress and state legislatures and creating some unlikely allies.
Paul Vathis/AP