Ed-Tech Policy

Excise Tax To Pay for School Technology Advocated

By Peter West — May 17, 1995 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To buy all the computers, all the software, and all the related equipment envisioned in technology plans floating around state education departments would cost $31.5 billion, according to an analysis by the Milken Family Foundation.

The best and most politically feasible way to pay for improvements that would bring the nation’s schools into the information age would be a national tax on sales of computer hardware and software, the study’s author argues.

Lewis Solomon, the president of the Milken Institute for Job & Capital Formation, a division of the foundation, announced the survey results and his plan for the national tax earlier this month. Such a tax, along with local matching funds and contributions from business, would give students and teachers the technology they need to compete in today’s economy, he said.

The tax would also provide enough money to insure that the technology infrastructure would never become obsolete, he added.

But Mr. Solomon, a former dean of the education school at the University of California at Los Angeles, said Congress is unlikely to pass such a tax unless a sizable constituency arises around the issue of wiring classrooms.

While no such lobby yet exists for school technology, Mr. Solomon said an existing cadre of “true believers” among teaching professionals could help build the needed political pressure.

Mr. Solomon surveyed all 50 chief state school officers to arrive at his cost estimates. He said that 44 percent of respondents already had technology plans, and the rest said they were creating them.

Massive Expenditures

His survey data, which he plans to incorporate into a book, were released this month at the 1995 Milken Family Foundation National Education Conference in Los Angeles. The Santa Monica-based foundation focuses on education, community welfare, and medical and heath-care research.

Mr. Solomon argued that to fully pay the estimated costs of implementing those plans over the next five years, a 5 percent federal excise tax on sales of computer hardware and software could raise as much as $5 billion annually.

He said the remainder of the $31.5 billion would come from state matching funds and from industry contributions.

“People argue that sales taxes are regressive,” he said. “But people who buy computers are more affluent than most. It’s almost more like a luxury tax than a sales tax.”

He also said that revenues from the federal tax would likely increase as sales of computers and software increase over time, creating a fund that schools could use to replace aging equipment.

Replacing obsolescent inventory is a nagging problem for the nation’s schools, where half the computers are incapable of processing today’s software or tapping communications networks.

Mr. Solomon said the $31.5 billion estimate does not include the cost of placing a computer on every student’s desk. That, he said, would cost an additional $39 billion.

A version of this article appeared in the May 17, 1995 edition of Education Week as Excise Tax To Pay for School Technology Advocated

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Unlocking Success for Struggling Adolescent Readers
The Science of Reading transformed K-3 literacy. Now it's time to extend that focus to students in grades 6 through 12.
Content provided by STARI
Jobs Regional K-12 Virtual Career Fair: DMV
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
CTE for All: How One School Board Builds Future-Ready Students
Discover how CPSB uses partnerships and high-quality digital resources to build equitable, future-ready CTE pathways for every student.
Content provided by Cengage School

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Ed-Tech Policy Nation's 2nd Largest District Moves to Limit Student Screen Use
LAUSD will limit classroom screen time, emphasizing quality learning over device use.
Photos of board members decorate the walls inside LAUSD headquarters Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, in Los Angeles.
Photos of board members decorate the walls inside LAUSD headquarters Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, in Los Angeles. The Los Angeles Board of Education recently voted to limit screen time in classrooms.
Damian Dovarganes/AP
Ed-Tech Policy Letter to the Editor Don’t Ban Phones, Limit Them
Phones can be useful tools, says a high school student.
1 min read
Education Week opinion letters submissions
Gwen Keraval for Education Week
Ed-Tech Policy Welcome to the 'Funky' Politics of the Tech in Schools Debate
The Trump administration is cheerleading AI in schools as GOP lawmakers crack down on ed tech.
9 min read
In this Oct. 5, 1980, file photo, Nancy Armstrong, a teacher at the Marshall elementary school in Harrisburg, Pa., assists her students in the use of computers to aid them in their studies. Today’s grandparents may have fond memories of the “good old days,” but history tells us that adults have worried about their kids’ fascination with new-fangled entertainment and technology since the days of dime novels, radio, the first comic books and rock n’ roll.
In this Oct. 5, 1980, file photo, Nancy Armstrong, a teacher at Marshall Elementary School in Harrisburg, Pa., assists her students in the use of computers to aid them in their learning. The debate about how much time students should spend using technology to learn has been around for decades, but is now heating up in Congress and state legislatures and creating some unlikely allies.
Paul Vathis/AP
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Ed-Tech Policy Whitepaper
Something Has Shifted: Phone-Free Schools in 2026
This report explores what’s driving the shift, what schools are seeing in classrooms, and what it means for leaders navigating student ph...
Content provided by Yondr