IT Management

Districts Counseled on Protecting Web Access After Loss of Net Neutrality

By Sean Cavanagh — January 17, 2018 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

As school districts weigh the impact of losing assurances of “net neutrality,” a professional organization is encouraging them to protect themselves upfront against a potential decline in the speed and quality of their web access.

The Consortium for School Networking has released a tip sheet for district officials on content-delivery practices they should require in contracts with internet-service providers.

The organization, which represents K-12 technology leaders, concedes that the document is premised on some speculation and guesswork. That’s because it’s unclear how school systems’ internet access will be affected—if at all—by last month’s closely watched and divisive policy change approved by the Federal Communications Commission.

“I don’t think we’re saying we have a magic bullet in a post-net-neutrality world,” said Keith Krueger, the consortium’s CEO. “We want to provide practical advice to districts. Are there things they can do? Are there protections they can put in place?”

Meanwhile, lawmakers in at least three states are seeking to fight the FCC’s policy change, with legislative proposals aimed at guarding net-neutrality principles in their states. FCC officials have suggested the state efforts won’t hold up under legal scrutiny.

Net neutrality is the idea that internet-service providers should not be allowed to treat web traffic differently, slowing some content and prioritizing other material based on an organization’s ability to pay for faster service or other factors.

Like many ed-tech organizations, COSN has argued that the FCC’s Dec. 14 vote to dismantle Obama-era net-neutrality protections was a mistake that could potentially hurt schools.

That policy decision, championed by Republican FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, reversed a two-year-old order designed to protect net neutrality. The earlier order forbade internet-service companies from blocking or throttling content—basically degrading or impairing the flow of traffic—or engaging in “paid prioritization” of content.

Pai has argued the 2015 policy was federal overreach that has stymied innovations by internet-service providers that could benefit web users. He says fears that the companies will engage in bad practices are overblown.

Some school leaders and librarians, however, fear that the FCC’s change will result in slowing the flow of educational content—such as videos, games, and curricula—that teachers and students rely on.

Others worry that without net neutrality, internet-service providers will give preferential treatment to the wealthiest companies and education content providers, while slowing online resources created by small, potentially innovative businesses.

COSN advises districts to take the following steps to protect themselves:

• They should closely review their service-level agreements with vendors and make sure they include specific metrics on internet performance. The metrics should include the “entire complement of internet traffic,” regardless of what internet protocol, or network delivery system, is used by the district.

• They should ask their internet-service providers for written assurances that there will be no “preferential treatment” for content, based on site origination or destination, internet protocol, and other factors.

Overall, district technology leaders should not hesitate, when negotiating with internet-service providers, to “ask them point-blank: ‘What is your policy on this?’ ” said Marie Bjerede, the principal of leadership initiatives for COSN.

States Poised for Fight

One lingering question for K-12 officials is how easily they would be able to determine with any certainty that their online content was being slowed or throttled—or if the traffic flow is slowing down for another reason, related to a website, network, or capacity problem.

Ron Reyer, the director of technology services for the Bethel Park school district in Pennsylvania, said answering those questions is far from simple. But K-12 officials have the right to ask internet-service companies to provide details on their performance in ensuring fast delivery of content, said Reyer, who worked with a group of school officials who contributed ideas for the COSN document.

The goal should be to “engage vendors, content providers, and [districts] in a three-way conversation on, ‘How are we going to solve our problem?’ ” Reyer said.

Fred Campbell, the director of Tech Knowledge, a free-market think tank and a supporter of Pai’s policy, said he sees no harm in COSN’s advice to districts. But he also does not believe that internet-service providers are about to change their practices in ways that will undermine schools. Districts are “enterprise customers,” and internet-service providers have an incentive to make them happy.

“I’d be very surprised if it is ever necessary,” Campbell said of the COSN document. “I see very little to be gained [for those companies] in blocking that content.”

The consortium’s document notes that groups of districts served by the same internet-service provider will have more leverage with those companies in negotiating contract provisions than would individual school systems. Districts that have a choice of more than one provider will have that negotiating power, too, said Krueger.

But many districts have few options, he noted: 43 percent of district technology officials surveyed by COSN last year said they have only one internet-service provider available to them.

“If you’re in a place with no competition, there’s no recourse if your provider doesn’t want to” maintain an unrestricted flow of web traffic, Krueger said.

In some state capitals, lawmakers are already taking steps aimed at preserving net neutrality. Bills introduced in a number of states—including California, Massachusetts, and Nebraska—seek to preserve internet conditions that they say existed before the passage of the FCC’s order in December. In addition, some state attorneys general have vowed to sue to block the federal policy.

FCC officials responded to an Education Week inquiry about the state legislation by pointing to language in Pai’s order that seeks to pre-empt any state or local policies that contradict the FCC’s new policy.

The commission’s order pre-empts any state or local policies that “could pose an obstacle to or place an undue burden on the provision of broadband internet-access service,” the order says, “and conflict with the deregulatory approach” adopted by the FCC.

A version of this article appeared in the January 17, 2018 edition of Education Week as K-12 Districts Advised on Rights in Post-'Net Neutrality’ Era


Commenting has been disabled on edweek.org effective Sept. 8. Please visit our FAQ section for more details. To get in touch with us visit our contact page, follow us on social media, or submit a Letter to the Editor.


Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
6 Key Trends in Teaching and Learning
As we enter the third school year affected by the pandemic—and a return to the classroom for many—we come better prepared, but questions remain. How will the last year impact teaching and learning this school
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Ensuring Continuity of Learning: How to Prepare for the Next Disruption
Across the country, K-12 schools and districts are, again, considering how to ensure effective continuity of learning in the face of emerging COVID variants, politicized debates, and more. Learn from Alexandria City Public Schools superintendent
Content provided by Class
Teaching Profession Live Online Discussion What Have We Learned From Teachers During the Pandemic?
University of California, Santa Cruz, researcher Lora Bartlett and her colleagues spent months studying how the pandemic affected classroom teachers. We will discuss the takeaways from her research not only for teachers, but also for

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

IT Management From Our Research Center Don't Buy 'Stupid Stuff:' Essential Advice for Technology Purchasing
School districts have more digital devices on their hands than ever before. Here's what they can do to get the biggest bang for their buck.
8 min read
RESET 4 TechFunding lead Image 1156179329
Alan Yrok/iStock
IT Management Download How to Make the Best Tech Decisions for Schools: A Downloadable Guide
Identify gaps, assess available solutions, solicit input from end users, and test drive new products, services, or approaches.
1 min read
IT Management Schools Are Flush With Stimulus Money. Will They Waste It on Unproven Technology?
Districts are throwing billions of dollars at ed tech that could be ineffective, underutilized, and come with hidden long-term costs.
8 min read
Conceptual finance image of large group of flying money of American one hundred dollar bills in binary coded tunnel
iStock/Getty Images Plus
IT Management Goodbye, Adobe Flash: What Educators Need to Know
Programs that run on Adobe Flash will no longer work on any devices or browsers after Jan. 12.
2 min read
Image shows laptop computer with Adobe Flash headstone
F.Sheehan/Education Week + Getty