Virginia Revamps Its Social Studies And History Standards

By Mary Ann Zehr — April 11, 2001 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

“New and improved” is generally a fitting characterization of Virginia’s revised history and social studies standards, according to experts and Virginia educators who have reviewed them.

For More Information

Read Virginia’s new history and social science standards, from the Virginia Department of Education. (Requires Adobe’s Acrobat Reader.)

The “History and Social Science Standards of Learning,” adopted by the state board of education late last month and expected to go into effect by the beginning of the next school year, have been modified in response to concerns that arose as schools implemented the standards in those subjects that the state adopted in 1995.

“We’re one of the few states that has truly tried to introduce history into our state accountability program,” said Kirk T. Schroder, the president of the Virginia board of education. “That area is full of controversial issues.”

He added that the new 41-page document that specifies what Virginia students should learn about history and social studies responds to “sequencing and other pedagogical issues” raised by educators.

E.D. Hirsch Jr.

E.D. Hirsch Jr., a professor of education and humanities at the University of Virginia and the author of the influential 1987 best seller Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know, said he considered the new standards “a big improvement over the prior ones.”

While he was not formally involved in writing either version of the Virginia standards, Mr. Hirsch said he had critiqued the 1995 history and social studies standards at the request of the state school board and found them wanting for two reasons.

First, he said, they had contained what he felt was an “indoctrination flavor” in presenting some standards about economics, such as implying that the free market was “wonderful.” Second, he said, they had crammed too much world history into a short period in students’ school careers, rather than spreading it out over more grades.

The new standards appear to have omitted references to the economy that are “ideological,” according to Mr. Hirsch, and also seem to have taken a more gradual approach to teaching world history.

Christopher T. Cross, the president of the Washington-based Council for Basic Education, a nonprofit organization that reviews and assesses states’ standards, said the 1995 standards reflected a “log-rolling mentality of creating standards,” which resulted in their covering too much material. He said the revised standards were more focused.

“In the revision, they’ve moved some material from grade to grade. I think they include well-thought-through and constructive changes that reflect the thought that you have to be cognizant of the amount of time children have to learn,” Mr. Cross said.

But Debbie Lou Hague, a geography and government teacher at First Colonial High School in Virginia Beach, Va., and the president of the Virginia Council for the Social Studies, said she thought the revised standards didn’t go far enough in omitting some of the “insignificant details” of the earlier standards.

“Is it really necessary for a 3rd grader to know the importance of the Charter of Virginia?” she asked.

More Flexibility

Other educators said the revised standards were less prescriptive than the earlier ones about when to teach various standards, allowing schools to cover some standards in any one of several grades.

The standards are also clearer and better organized than they were in the past, said Sara R. Shoob, the K-12 social studies coordinator for the 160,000-student Fairfax County school district, who served on a committee to revise the K-3 portion of the history and social studies standards.

“The skills the kids need to know are put first, which gives greater emphasis on things such as critical-thinking skills,” Ms. Shoob said. “We’re hoping that with a greater emphasis on those skills, we’ll create better test questions that ask kids to think creatively rather than produce facts.”

In addition, she said, the revised standards are “much more developmentally appropriate” than the earlier ones. For example, she said, the earlier standards required 2nd graders to compare the ways that money can increase in value in savings and investments. “That wasn’t appropriate for a 2nd grader,” she said, adding the standard had been cut in the revision.

Ms. Shoob said the standards had some gaps, however, in addressing the impact of various cultures on American history. She said she hoped that those gaps might be made up in the teachers’ resource guide for the standards, which is being written now and is expected to be published by fall.

“There’s no mention of the impact of Hispanic-Americans on our culture,” she said. “That’s a huge minority group. Granted, they didn’t have a huge impact on the history of Virginia. They have had a huge impact on the history of the United States.”

Mr. Schroder, the president of the state board, noted that a dispute between Americans of Armenian and Turkish descent over what to include about the history of the Ottoman Empire in the standards had dominated board discussions and had not yet been resolved.

“The Armenians strongly urged the formal recognition of the Armenian genocide by the Ottoman Empire,” he said. “The Turks disagreed with that.”

The board decided that the revised standards would require students to learn about the development of the Ottoman Empire, but the issue of whether they would be required to learn about a massacre at its hand would be taken up again in the writing of the teachers’ resource guide.

A version of this article appeared in the April 11, 2001 edition of Education Week as Virginia Revamps Its Social Studies And History Standards


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Assessment Webinar
The State of Assessment in K-12 Education
What is the impact of assessment on K-12 education? What does that mean for administrators, teachers and most importantly—students?
Content provided by Instructure
Jobs January 2022 Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Proven Strategies to Improve Reading Scores
In this webinar, education and reading expert Stacy Hurst will provide a look at some of the biggest issues facing curriculum coordinators, administrators, and teachers working in reading education today. You will: Learn how schools
Content provided by Reading Horizons

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Standards Opinion How the Failure of the Common Core Looked From the Ground
Steve Peha shares insights from his on-site professional-development work about why the common core failed, in a guest letter to Rick Hess.
4 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards Opinion Common Core Is a Meal Kit, Not a Nothingburger
Caroline Damon argues Rick Hess and Tom Loveless sold the common core short, claiming the issue was a matter of high-quality implementation.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards How New Common Core Research Connects to Biden's Plans for Children and Families
A study of national test scores indicate the early phase of the Common Core State Standards did not help disadvantaged students.
5 min read
results 925693186 02
Standards Opinion After All That Commotion, Was the Common Core a Big Nothingburger?
The Common Core State Standards may not have had an impact on student outcomes, but they did make school improvement tougher and more ideological.
3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty