Opinion
Standards Opinion

Why Students Don’t Know Much About History

By Diane Ravitch — March 04, 1998 6 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Why should this be so? One reason is that history too often is taught by teachers who did not study history as undergraduates. The National Center for Education Statistics reported in 1996 that “over half of all public school students enrolled in history or world civilization classes in grades 7-12 ... were taught by teachers who did not have at least a minor in history.” Fifty-nine percent of students in middle school and 43 percent of high school students were studying history with a teacher who had not earned at least a history minor in college.

The NCES assumes that teachers who lack either a major or a minor in their main academic field are teaching out of field. Most people now teaching social studies or history in the schools have neither a major nor a minor in history. In some states, people can be licensed to teach social studies without ever having taken a single history course in college.

Based on its Schools and Staffing Survey, the NCES found that an astonishing 81.5 percent of social studies teachers in grades 7 through 12 have neither a major nor a minor in history. Fifty-five percent of those who teach one or more history courses do not have at least a minor in history. Fifty-three percent of those who teach two or more history courses do not have a major or a minor in history; 64 percent of those who teach one history course lack either a major or a minor in history.

What is the educational background of those who are now teaching social studies and history? The NCES reports that 71 percent of social studies teachers took their undergraduate degree in education. Among the 81.5 percent of social studies teachers who did not major or minor in history, 14 percent got an undergraduate degree in social studies education, and 65 percent have an education degree that is not related to any academic discipline, from fields such as special education, secondary education, bilingual education, curriculum, educational administration, or guidance.

Nearly half of the social studies teachers who lack a history education have earned an advanced degree, but few received one in any academic discipline. Among social studies teachers who do have a master’s degree, nearly 90 percent earned it in pedagogy, not history or the social sciences.

What is the educational preparation of that 55 percent of history teachers who have neither a major nor a minor in history? Nearly 77 percent have an undergraduate degree in education, 11 percent have an undergraduate degree in a social science other than history, and 5 percent earned their degree in some other academic subject. Nearly half of this group has a master’s degree, but few were earned in any academic discipline; more than 80 percent got their master’s degree in education.

It is professional malpractice when state officials do not require teachers to demonstrate that they know what they are supposed to teach.

Not surprisingly, the history teachers who earned either a major or a minor in history have a far stronger academic preparation, both as undergraduates and at the graduate level, than their colleagues who did not study history. Among this group, 72 percent have an undergraduate degree in history or one of the social sciences, 22 percent majored in education, and 4 percent in other academic subjects. Of those in this group who hold master’s degrees, 30 percent gained one in education, 21 percent in history or a social science, and 1 percent in another academic field.

A picture begins to emerge of the social studies profession in relation to the teaching of history. The vast majority of social studies teachers--81.5 percent--as well as a majority of history teachers--55 percent--did not major or minor in history, nor did they earn a graduate degree in history. The typical social studies teacher has an undergraduate degree in education and, if she or he has a master’s degree, it too is in education.

At this point, it seems reasonable to ask: How can teachers teach what they have not studied? How can students learn challenging subject matter from teachers who have not chosen to study what they are teaching? How can teachers create engaging, innovative, and even playful ways to present ideas that they have not mastered themselves? How can teachers whose own knowledge of history is fragmentary help students debate controversial issues?

Today many states expect students to study not only U.S. history, but increasingly more difficult courses in world history. How are students going to learn world history from teachers who never studied world history? How many teachers in the United States are qualified to teach the rigorous content in the standards for U.S. and world history prepared by the National Center for History in the Schools at the University of California-Los Angeles?

Why do state officials grant teaching credentials to people to teach a subject that they have not studied? Why is teacher certification based on completion of education courses, rather than on mastery of what is to be taught? Why not require future teachers of history to have a major or at least a strong minor in history?

In what other profession would public officials be so indifferent to professional preparation? Imagine going to a hospital and finding that the credentialling system permits scrub nurses to perform surgery. Or boarding an airliner to learn that ticket clerks have been certified to pilot the plane. In education, placing teachers into out-of-field positions has become the usual, the acceptable, and the normal.

It is professional malpractice when state officials do not require teachers to demonstrate--either by appropriate credentials or examination--that they know what they are supposed to teach. The NCES reports that 39.5 percent of science teachers have neither a major nor a minor in science. Why should American students learn science, mathematics, or history from people who did not study those fields?

Who should prepare history teachers? History teachers should study history in college. They should certainly have at least a minor and preferably a major in history, including American and world history courses. Future teachers should study the history of Europe, Africa, Asia, Latin America, and India. They should study the social sciences and literature as part of their preparation. They should learn pedagogical methods, either in education courses or as apprentices with mentors.

The federal government and the states should offer incentives to liberal arts colleges to prepare future teachers of history, science, English, and mathematics. They should also encourage collaboration between schools of education and liberal arts colleges on the same campus to prepare future teachers to understand and teach to the best state, national, and international aca-demic standards. Together, the different parts of the university should create an appropriate balance between the knowledge and the skills that good history teachers need.

Those who care about history education must insist that states establish a strong history curriculum across the grades and that teachers of history are well prepared to teach it. If those who teach history have never studied it, how can they teach it? If they don’t enjoy learning about it themselves, how can they transmit a love for history to their students?

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the March 04, 1998 edition of Education Week as Why Students Don’t Know Much About History


Commenting has been disabled on edweek.org effective Sept. 8. Please visit our FAQ section for more details. To get in touch with us visit our contact page, follow us on social media, or submit a Letter to the Editor.


Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
What’s Next for Teaching and Learning? Key Trends for the New School Year
The past 18 months changed the face of education forever, leaving teachers, students, and families to adapt to unprecedented challenges in teaching and learning. As we enter the third school year affected by the pandemic—and
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Webinar
How Data and Digital Curriculum Can Drive Personalized Instruction
As we return from an abnormal year, it’s an educator’s top priority to make sure the lessons learned under adversity positively impact students during the new school year. Digital curriculum has emerged from the pandemic
Content provided by Kiddom
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Leadership for Racial Equity in Schools and Beyond
While the COVID-19 pandemic continues to reveal systemic racial disparities in educational opportunity, there are revelations to which we can and must respond. Through conscientious efforts, using an intentional focus on race, school leaders can
Content provided by Corwin

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Standards Opinion How the Failure of the Common Core Looked From the Ground
Steve Peha shares insights from his on-site professional-development work about why the common core failed, in a guest letter to Rick Hess.
4 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards Opinion Common Core Is a Meal Kit, Not a Nothingburger
Caroline Damon argues Rick Hess and Tom Loveless sold the common core short, claiming the issue was a matter of high-quality implementation.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards How New Common Core Research Connects to Biden's Plans for Children and Families
A study of national test scores indicate the early phase of the Common Core State Standards did not help disadvantaged students.
5 min read
results 925693186 02
iStock/Getty
Standards Opinion After All That Commotion, Was the Common Core a Big Nothingburger?
The Common Core State Standards may not have had an impact on student outcomes, but they did make school improvement tougher and more ideological.
3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty