Opinion
Assessment Letter to the Editor

‘Value Added’ Evaluations Raise Complex Issues

November 13, 2012 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

Regarding the article “Caution Urged on ‘Value Added’ Reviews” (Oct. 31, 2012): The notion of measuring human beings—their teaching performance, their compassion, their aptitude, or their ability—using test scores derived from computerized or paper-and-pencil tests given to children with different lives, backgrounds, language dominance, economic, or emotional circumstances (who are also human beings) is ludicrous.

Among the infinitely complex questions arising with regard to “value added” evaluations are the following:

• Will physical-fitness tests be used to evaluate gym teachers?

• Will English-proficiency scores be used to evaluate English-as-a-second-language teachers? Or will students’ standardized-test scores be used? Who will be held accountable, the classroom teacher, or the ESL teacher?

• How will K-2 teachers be evaluated? Will the teacher be judged by the percentage of children reaching benchmarks? Which benchmarks? Which assessments?

• How will art, music, and social studies teachers be evaluated? What about library media specialists and high school teachers in nontested subjects or grades? Will these teachers escape scrutiny, or will new tests be hastily invented?

• What about science? In some states, standardized tests are only administered in grades 5 and 8. Will pretest data gathered from tests given to students in grade 5 be used to rate grade 8 science teachers? Who will be held accountable? Such tests measure cumulative knowledge gained over several years. What about student mobility?

• How will special education teachers be evaluated? Will the special education or the general education teacher be held accountable for growth when students receive a major portion of their instruction through inclusion or resource services? Will attainment of individualized-education-program goals be used, or standardized-test scores? What about those who teach children whose disabilities mean their academic growth cannot be measured on existing standardized instruments?

It is time for Americans to rise up and shout in unison, “The emperor has no clothes!”

Ann Evans de Bernard

Principal

Waltersville School

Bridgeport Public Schools

Bridgeport, Conn.

A version of this article appeared in the November 15, 2012 edition of Education Week as ‘Value Added’ Evaluations Raise Complex Issues

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Your Questions on the Science of Reading, Answered
Dive into the Science of Reading with K-12 leaders. Discover strategies, policy insights, and more in our webinar.
Content provided by Otus
Mathematics Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: Breaking the Cycle: How Districts are Turning around Dismal Math Scores
Math myth: Students just aren't good at it? Join us & learn how districts are boosting math scores.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Achievement Webinar
How To Tackle The Biggest Hurdles To Effective Tutoring
Learn how districts overcome the three biggest challenges to implementing high-impact tutoring with fidelity: time, talent, and funding.
Content provided by Saga Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment The 5 Burning Questions for Districts on Grading Reforms
As districts rethink grading policies, they consider the purpose of grades and how to make them more reliable measures of learning.
5 min read
Grading reform lead art
Illustration by Laura Baker/Education Week with E+ and iStock/Getty
Assessment As They Revamp Grading, Districts Try to Improve Consistency, Prevent Inflation
Districts have embraced bold changes to make grading systems more consistent, but some say they've inflated grades and sent mixed signals.
10 min read
Close crop of a teacher's hands grading a stack of papers with a red marker.
E+
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Sponsor
Fewer, Better Assessments: Rethinking Assessments and Reducing Data Fatigue
Imagine a classroom where data isn't just a report card, but a map leading students to their full potential. That's the kind of learning experience we envision at ANet, alongside educators
Content provided by Achievement Network
Superintendent Dr. Kelly Aramaki - Watch how ANet helps educators
Photo provided by Achievement Network
Assessment Opinion What's the Best Way to Grade Students? Teachers Weigh In
There are many ways to make grading a better, more productive experience for students. Here are a few.
14 min read
Images shows colorful speech bubbles that say "Q," "&," and "A."
iStock/Getty