Assessment Opinion

Toward a New Era in Educational Assessment

By Contributing Blogger — October 24, 2014 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

This post is by Bob Lenz, Co-Founder and Chief of Innovation at Envision Education

When we started Envision Schools 13 years ago, we believed then--as we do now--that standardized assessments were necessary but insufficient for determining college and career readiness. It seemed obvious to us, as it does to so many educators, that bubbles would only ever tell part of the story and that broader, richer assessments were critical to showing the full range of a student’s abilities. This is why we, in collaboration with the Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equity (SCALE), created the Deeper Learning Student Assessment System (DLSAS). Schools and students needed better, more complete ways of demonstrating knowledge and skills, ways of conducting authentic performance assessment for students.

David Conley has just released a new report that highlights just how important this topic is. In A New Era for Educational Assessment, Conley argues that the time is ripe for a major shift in educational assessment, from an overreliance on standardized tests of math and reading, which tell us little about college and career readiness, to the use of multiple measures to gauge progress in learning the full range of content and skills that truly matter after high school.

His report comes at just the right time: while we have heard endlessly about teacher, student, and parent frustration over standardized testing, about what those tests are missing, and how limited they are, the educational community has been too silent about alternatives. Conley offers several, and his report is essential to the larger conversation about performance assessment and what needs to happen in American schools.

But what exactly is “authentic performance assessment” and how do we know when it’s happening? Why should you care about Conley’s report?

Real performance assessment happens when we measure not just knowledge, but also skills and competencies that are inextricably related to success in college and career. This kind of assessment is concerned not just with content, but with real-world applications. Here’s how you know when you have true, meaningful performance assessment happening in your classroom: when preparing for the test, taking the test, and then applying the skill in real life all look the same.

Consider the skill of parallel parking (or any other driving competency). How do you learn and practice it? By parallel parking. When you’re getting a driver’s license, how are you tested for this skill? By parallel parking. And what do you do with the skill after you pass the test? You parallel park.

The driver’s license exam is a culminating assessment that results in the legal right to drive. It is not the only assessment in the process: the driver’s permit exam--usually a written or electronic, standard multiple-choice test--assesses your knowledge of the rules of the road. It is an important step in the process, but not as important as demonstrating what you can actually do with your knowledge: that’s where the performance test of actually driving and parking the car comes in.

Seen in this light, the need for real performance assessment in schools becomes more obvious. We can see exactly how important DOING is to the process of learning, and we can easily agree that a driver’s license should only be conferred on someone who knows not just the rules of the road but also how to operate a car.

Conley’s report helps us understand the continuum of the types of assessments and invites states to consider how to move their assessments from “Parts & Pieces” towards “Big Picture.”

Standardized assessments, even when they include open-ended questions and are performance-based, only give us part of the picture of a student’s readiness for college and career success. Project-centered tasks ask students to practice and demonstrate command over the very skills they will need for the next step in their learning journey. We think we need to move from having students drive toward their future while looking in the rear view mirror - tell me what you know - to an eyes forward assessment - preparing them for the world to come. This video created with Envision and the design firm IDEO illustrates this analogy.


  1. College and career readiness depends on more than just academic knowledge and skills. Students also need to develop an array of personal and interpersonal competencies, as well as practical knowledge about the transition to life after high school. Examples include time management, perseverance, goal setting, self- advocacy, and even financial planning.
  2. Schools can assess--and teach--a much wider range of competencies. Research shows convincingly that student motivation, persistence, self- discipline, problem solving, college planning, and other critical elements of college and career readiness can be assessed and taught effectively.
  3. Traditional state tests are convenient but not very informative. Standardized, multiple-choice reading and math tests are reliable, familiar, affordable, and easy to administer. Unfortunately, they do not provide much useful information about students’ progress toward long- term goals.
  4. States are taking a new look at performance assessments. Today, a number of states are returning to performance assessments in order to get a better read on college and career readiness: the movement is already happening.
  5. College and career readiness are best measured through a combination of assessments. Multiple-choice achievement tests have their uses, but so do diagnostic tests, performance tasks, informal assessments, and other means of tracking student progress. No single measure is sufficient both to judge schools’ performance and guide instruction


Conley offers a wide range of recommendations for education stakeholders to follow; only a few are listed here. This is a starting point, a place for those of us who want to see real change happen to come together and make agreements. For a complete list of Conley’s recommendations, see the full A New Era report. For now, let’s take his advice and do the following:

  1. Define college and career readiness comprehensively.
  2. Adapt federal education policy to allow greater flexibility in the types of data that can be used to demonstrate student learning and growth.
  3. Look for ways to improve the Common Core State Standards and related assessments so that they become better measures of deeper learning.
  4. Determine the professional learning, curriculum, and resource needs of educators to implement a new system of assessments.

At Envision Education, we stand ready and excited to contribute to these efforts. The time is now for states and districts, charter management organizations and all of the educational initiatives--blended, personalized, and project-based, connected and linked, STEM and STEAM, and everything in between--to align with assessing deeper learning outcomes in order to truly prepare our young people for college and career success, in ways that will have real, positive impacts on their lives.

The opinions expressed in Learning Deeply are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.