Opinion
Assessment Letter to the Editor

Educator: Online PARCC Test Is ‘Inefficient’ and ‘Unreliable’

February 23, 2016 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

Kudos to Education Week for your investigation of the 2014-15 PARCC test scores that were disproportionately lower when taken online, compared with the paper test (“PARCC Scores Lower on Computer Exams”). What I did not see in your report was feedback from educators who actually took both versions of the test, as I did with several Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers practice tests last spring in English/language arts.

It took me about 10 minutes to conclude that there was a glaring mismatch between the skills PARCC was trying to test and the complicated navigation steps necessary to travel through test items. It was clear that the online format was not ready for prime time when it was released. The paper format was significantly more accessible and navigable.

In the online version, a typical reading-comprehension test item required students to scroll down as many as 10 screens in order to finish the passage and arrive at the questions which, in turn, required students to refer back to specific moments in the passage without any mention of the screen, page, or line numbers to which they needed to return. Maddening. Inefficient. And absolutely unreliable.

Unlike a pencil-and-paper test, where students see questions and text side by side or on adjoining pages, PARCC’s online exam posed close-text-analysis questions while leaving students to scroll up to the text and back down to the question in the clunkiest and most awkward of ways.

Nationally adopted standardized tests constitute a near-monopoly in the marketplace. With that much money, instructional time, and stress for students, parents, and educators, we deserve a consumer-driven approach to evaluating tests before they are foisted upon us. User review, with user feedback, would have uncovered these problems before they tainted the test’s reliability.

Robert A. Levin

Visiting Specialist

Department of Educational Foundations

Montclair State University

Co-Founder and Managing Director

Levin Educational Consultants

Metuchen, N.J.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the February 24, 2016 edition of Education Week as Educator: Online PARCC Test Is ‘Inefficient’ and ‘Unreliable’

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Profession Webinar
How Does Educator Well-Being Impact Social-Emotional Awareness in Schools?
Explore how adult well-being is key to promoting healthy social-emotional behaviors for students. Get strategies to reduce teacher stress.
Content provided by International Baccalaureate
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
IT Infrastructure Webinar
A New Era In Connected Learning: Security, Accessibility and Affordability for a Future-Ready Classroom
Learn about Windows 11 SE and Surface Laptop SE. Enable students to unlock learning and develop new skills.
Content provided by Microsoft Surface
Classroom Technology K-12 Essentials Forum Making Technology Work Better in Schools
Join experts for a look at the steps schools are taking (or should take) to improve the use of technology in schools.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment Opinion What the Digital SAT Will Mean for Students and Educators
The college-admissions test will be fully digital by 2024. Priscilla Rodriguez from the College Board discusses the change.
6 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Assessment Opinion Searching for Common Ground: What Makes a Good Test?
Rick Hess and USC Dean Pedro Noguera discuss standardized testing—what it’s for, where it’s gone wrong, and how to improve it.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Assessment Spotlight Spotlight on Assessment in 2022
This Spotlight will help you understand how to use assessment data to guide student learning and examine the debate over standardized tests.
Assessment State Test Results Are In. Are They Useless?
While states, districts, and schools pore over data from spring 2021 tests, experts urge caution over how to interpret and use the results.
9 min read
FILE - In this Jan. 17, 2016 file photo, a sign is seen at the entrance to a hall for a college test preparation class in Bethesda, Md. The $380 million test coaching industry is facing competition from free or low-cost alternatives in what their founders hope will make the process of applying to college more equitable. Such innovations are also raising questions about the relevance and the fairness of relying on standardized tests in admissions process.
A sign is posted at the entrance to a hall for a test-preparation class. Assessment experts say educators should use data from spring 2021 tests with caution.
Alex Brandon/AP