Opinion
Teaching Opinion

Curriculum-Mapping Our Way to Relevance

By Jake Giessman — February 03, 2009 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

When will I ever use this? Good teachers have ready responses to this perennial question. You’ll use algebra at the hardware store. You’ll need proper punctuation in job applications. You’ll learn from history’s mistakes.

But kids are savvy. They know they will never be sitting on a northbound train calculating when the southbound train will pass by. They know Spiro Agnew appears in Trivial Pursuit but nowhere else. They know that grasping allusions to classical literature was important at 18th-century dinner parties but not in today’s workplace. And they know that if they wonder how photosynthesis works, they can always look it up online.

This is not to say that we shouldn’t teach our children. Only that we get so caught up in measuring what children have learned that we forget to evaluate the usefulness of what we teach.

Think about your own education. A few things you learned in school help you on a daily basis, but as the saying goes, you probably learned most of them on the playground. It’s difficult to remember what you actually studied in the classroom. If schools were honest about what they really are good for—that is, if they aligned their methods and objectives more closely with their utility—they would be much more effective.

For years, educational theorists have been trying to move us away from rote learning toward something more interactive and compelling. We have come to realize that truly educating a child is not like pouring liquid into an empty vessel, but more like giving the child a box of stuff and seeing if he or she can make anything out of it. Real learning is not memorization; it is discovery and construction.

Why, then, do we still organize our schools around bodies of relatively inert disciplinary knowledge? As adults, do our lives divide into categories like English, math, science, and social studies? Hardly.

We get so caught up in measuring what children have learned that we forget to evaluate the usefulness of what we teach.

Perhaps the school day ought to be divided into subjects more relevant to our lives: communication, problem-solving, and professional skills, for example. Or maybe it ought to be divided into subjects that mirror what the 21st century desperately needs: social entrepreneurship, invention, ethics, and cultural dialogue.

Better yet, what if school weren’t built around subjects at all? What if it were instead built around real-world problems and solutions? What if disciplinary content were so integrated that assessment could be based on genuine achievement, not on short-term retention of disparate facts and algorithms?

Imagine a high school without a bell-driven transition every 50 minutes. Groups of students could instead be attached to teams of teachers. Every quarter, each group would be assigned a single problem to solve together in an original way. Engaging that problem would take the bulk of the school day for the entire quarter.

Perhaps the students would be assigned to create a bilingual nature guide to a local park, or a comprehensive plan to reduce school energy costs. Maybe they would be asked how to revitalize the city’s downtown, or how to reduce the state’s incidence of West Nile virus. Or maybe they would be directed to create an arts festival about the adolescent experience, or a documentary of teenage life to share with a sister school overseas.

In this model, teachers would still need to share content knowledge with students, but they would do it differently. Teachers would collaborate to provide an interdisciplinary background to each problem. Then they would offer a basic structure for the solution process and ongoing support and coaching as students dug for relevant information, developed pertinent skills, created an authentic product, and shared it with an audience.

By creating real solutions to real problems for real audiences, students would have an incentive more compelling than letter grades, and a learning environment more relevant to their future. Soft skills, disciplinary knowledge, civic responsibility, and career know-how would all come together in a format far less arbitrary and arcane than the format students learn in today.

Clearly such a shift would involve a major curriculum-mapping effort. Care would need to be taken to ensure that group projects were orchestrated to spiral efficiently through all the knowledge and skill bases we deem important. Students also would need the skills and knowledge that colleges consider prerequisite.

As with many other major educational innovations, this shift might most easily be attempted in independent and charter schools. In fact, at some level, that is already happening. At Academy Hill, the independent school where I work, project-based learning has long been central. We see that students of all types, when given latitude, scaffolding, and open-ended long-term projects, are capable of learning and application far beyond what many educators had hoped.

I think, for example, of a student who opted to turn an English assignment on individuality into an original short film. It was later honored at a film festival. I also think of two students who, as part of a local robotics team, created an energy audit that helped their town library reduce costs. Our community-service program, originally run by parent volunteers but now run by students, also comes to mind. The list goes on.

Although the public education system has incredible inertia, there is no reason public schools could not eventually upset their traditional curriculum model, too. Educators everywhere are beginning to understand the true diversity of backgrounds and learning styles represented in the general student population, and they are floundering in attempts to adjust their pedagogy accordingly. It seems clear now that state-mandated high-stakes testing is not the answer. Shifting the focus of public education more squarely to authentic life skills seems to me a much better starting point.

Students learn more and do more when they are treated like agents. They need the support due a child, but the opportunity due professionals and citizens. Children intuit the interdisciplinary nature of human knowledge and enterprise, and they see keenly the frequent mismatch between pedagogy and application.

They don’t want to wait around to see if they will ever use what they are learning. They are ready to use it now.

Related Tags:
Instruction Opinion

A version of this article appeared in the February 04, 2009 edition of Education Week as Curriculum-Mapping Our Way to Relevance

Events

Student Well-Being K-12 Essentials Forum Social-Emotional Learning 2025: Examining Priorities and Practices
Join this free virtual event to learn about SEL strategies, skills, and to hear from experts on the use and expansion of SEL programs.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Professional Development Webinar
Inside PLCs: Proven Strategies from K-12 Leaders
Join an expert panel to explore strategies for building collaborative PLCs, overcoming common challenges, and using data effectively.
Content provided by Otus
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Science Webinar
Making Science Stick: The Engaging Power of Hands-On Learning
How can you make science class the highlight of your students’ day while
achieving learning outcomes? Find out in this session.
Content provided by LEGO Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Sponsor
The Time is Finally Right for Personalized, Competency-Based Education
We learn best from that which we directly experience. The salient details apprehended in natural time usually reinforce useful mental models of our world and occasionally invalidate elements of the established model.
Content provided by McGraw Hill
Young students use laptops in a classroom.
Photo provided by McGraw Hill School
Teaching Opinion Trump’s Executive Orders Are Coming Fast. Here’s What Teachers Can Do
Here are steps teachers can take to help students in the face of the president's executive orders.
4 min read
Conceptual illustration of classroom conversations and fragmented education elements coming together to form a cohesive picture of a book of classroom knowledge.
Sonia Pulido for Education Week
Teaching Download Teachers, Here's How to Build Stronger Relationships With Boys (Downloadable)
Boys are relational learners, experts say. Here are eight key strategies for how to reach them.
Jessica Arrow, a play-based learning kindergarten teacher, leads her kindergarten class back into their classroom from forest play time at Symonds Elementary School in Keene, N.H. on Nov. 7, 2024.
Jessica Arrow, a kindergarten teacher at Symonds Elementary School in Keene, N.H., leads her students back into their classroom from forest play time on Nov. 7, 2024. Boys crave strong relationships with their teachers, experts say.
Sophie Park for Education Week
Teaching Opinion 10 Actions Teachers Can Take Now That Trump Is President
On Day 1 of his second term, Trump issued orders that could negatively affect students. Here’s how to support them.
4 min read
Conceptual illustration of classroom conversations and fragmented education elements coming together to form a cohesive picture of a book of classroom knowledge.
Sonia Pulido for Education Week