Missouri Board Eases Test Targets

By Lynn Olson — January 31, 2006 1 min read

Some experts have worried that the federal No Child Left Behind Act will spur states to lower their standards so that more schools meet annual performance targets—and they’re pointing to Missouri as proof.

The Missouri board of education approved new standards for its state tests last month that should result in more students scoring “proficient” and “advanced” at some grade levels this year. Committees of educators and citizens developed the unanimously approved guidelines.

Commissioner of Education D. Kent King recommended the changes—the first since the tests became mandatory for all public schools in 1998—calling them “both rigorous and reasonable.”

But not everyone agrees.

“It’s a classic example of the kind of dumbing-down pressures” evident in education, said J. Martin Rochester, a distinguished teaching professor of political science at the University of Missouri at St. Louis. “The state tests have been pretty rigorous … and basically the educators have decided that’s too high.”

The Show Me State revised its performance standards, in part, because it has added tests in additional grades and subjects this year to comply with the federal act.

The law requires states to administer reading and mathematics tests in grades 3-8 and at least once in high school starting this school year. Until now, Missouri has tested math in grades 4, 8, and 10; and reading/ communication arts in grades 3, 7, and 11.

In addition, a 2004 state law required state education officials to align the Missouri Assessment Program more closely with the National Assessment of Educational Progress, a congressionally mandated testing program.

The new standards are intended to ensure that at least 40 percent of students score at least at the proficient level.

“My worry is that if we’ve changed the level of proficiency just to make school districts, including my own, look better, that’s kind of a false sense of accomplishment,” said Robert E. Bartman, the superintendent of the 2,400-student Center No. 58 School District, and a former state schools chief.


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Culturally Relevant Pedagogy to Advance Educational Equity
Schools are welcoming students back into buildings for full-time in-person instruction in a few short weeks and now is the perfect time to take a hard look at both our practices and systems to build
Content provided by PowerMyLearning
Classroom Technology Webinar Making Big Technology Decisions: Advice for District Leaders, Principals, and Teachers
Educators at all levels make decisions that can have a huge impact on students. That’s especially true when it comes to the use of technology, which was activated like never before to help students learn
Professional Development Webinar Expand Digital Learning by Expanding Teacher Training
This discussion will examine how things have changed and offer guidance on smart, cost-effective ways to expand digital learning efforts and train teachers to maximize the use of new technologies for learning.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Standards Opinion How the Failure of the Common Core Looked From the Ground
Steve Peha shares insights from his on-site professional-development work about why the common core failed, in a guest letter to Rick Hess.
4 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards Opinion Common Core Is a Meal Kit, Not a Nothingburger
Caroline Damon argues Rick Hess and Tom Loveless sold the common core short, claiming the issue was a matter of high-quality implementation.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards How New Common Core Research Connects to Biden's Plans for Children and Families
A study of national test scores indicate the early phase of the Common Core State Standards did not help disadvantaged students.
5 min read
results 925693186 02
Standards Opinion After All That Commotion, Was the Common Core a Big Nothingburger?
The Common Core State Standards may not have had an impact on student outcomes, but they did make school improvement tougher and more ideological.
3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty