Common-Core Group Revises Testing Times

By Catherine Gewertz — September 30, 2014 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The PARCC testing consortium has announced that schools will need to schedule about 10 hours of testing time this spring for elementary school students and nearly 11 hours or more for middle and high school students.

Released Sept. 25, the new time projections are higher than the estimates issued in March 2013, by PARCC, formally known as the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers. Those estimates predicted students would need eight to 10 hours of testing. That’s because the earlier figures reflected something different: the amount of time “typical” students would need to complete the English/language arts and mathematics tests.

The new numbers, informed by data from last spring’s field test of 1 million students, reflect the amounts of time needed to allow “virtually all” students to finish the tests.

The field tests showed that 75 percent of students finished the tests in 6½ to 7½ hours, PARCC officials said. But to facilitate test completion by “virtually all” students, PARCC is instructing schools to allot 9¾ hours to 11¼ hours for the first operational assessment in the spring of 2015.

Scheduling Enough Time

The PARCC consortium estimates that 75 percent of students will complete its spring 2015 tests in English/language arts and mathematics in 6½ to 7½ hours. But it requires schools to schedule additional time so that “virtually all” students can complete the tests.



PARCC, one of the two main multistate consortia developing new assessments for the Common Core State Standards, told schools to allot 13 to 15 hours for the field test, depending on students’ grade level. But that amount of time proved to be more than what most students needed, said Jeffrey Nellhaus, PARCC’s director of policy, research, and design.

Most students will complete the test sessions in 6½ to 7½ hours, PARCC said in an online announcement to members last week. “However, schools must plan for the full unit time so that all students have the opportunity to complete the test.”

The 6½- to-7½-hour time frame was provided to schools “for informational purposes,” Mr. Nellhaus said, so they can anticipate when many students would finish the exams.

Downsizing Tasks

The PARCC assessments in English/language arts and mathematics are given at two junctures of the school year: The longer performance-based tasks are given three-quarters of the way through the year, in three sessions in English/language arts and two sessions in math. Sets of shorter questions are given nine-tenths of the way through the year, typically in two sessions.

Details of the session times released by PARCC show key places where the consortium shaved off time. The end-of-year portion of the English/language arts test for grades 3-5 was shortened from two sessions to one, eliminating about an hour of test time. Five to 15 minutes were pared off of the math end-of-year test times. The projected times needed for the performance tasks in both subjects have been shortened in some cases, too, by 10 to 30 minutes.

Some of those reductions were facilitated by a PARCC decision, announced last month, to drop some questions and reading passages from the English/language arts end-of-year test.

PARCC officials said the consortium will re-examine the testing times after the test is given next spring to see if they need further adjustments. One of the unknowns, for instance, is whether students finished the field tests more quickly because they didn’t take them seriously. Time allotments might need to be adjusted if the spring 2015 test data indicate the students are taking longer to finish.

Other Projections

The other federally funded consortium, Smarter Balanced, has not changed its projected testing times in the wake of its field-testing experiences. The Smarter Balanced assessments are still projected to take seven to 8½ hours, depending on grade level, as the consortium announced in November 2012, according to spokeswoman Jacqueline King. To produce those time estimates, the consortium scaled back the number of performance tasks in the test to one in mathematics and one in English/language arts. Smarter Balanced’s original design was projected to take students 10½ hours or more to complete.

The time estimates for PARCC and Smarter Balanced exceed what many states currently require for their state exams, causing some political cringing. Those tests will not be the ones that most students in the country will take in the 2014-15 school year, however.

An Education Week analysis shows that only 17 states plan to use the Smarter Balanced test this spring, and nine states plus the District of Columbia plan to use the PARCC test. Twenty-four states, enrolling 58 percent of the K-12 students in the United States, have chosen other assessments or are still deciding which tests to use.

It remains to be seen whether PARCC’s new test-time estimates will represent significant increases or decreases for some of its member states. For example, in the District of Columbia, students currently take an untimed test. Minimum testing times range from six to 8½ hours, but students “regularly exceed these times,” said district spokesman Briant K. Coleman.

Superintendent Jesús Aguirre said that schools might find it easier to handle scheduling when they move to a test with defined session times. But he’s mindful of the risk that some students might feel they don’t have enough time.

“There is that tension around the timing issue,” he said. “We don’t want to reduce the opportunity for our kids to do their best, but I’m pretty confident that the times being proposed find the right middle ground.”

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the October 01, 2014 edition of Education Week as Assessment Group Revises Testing Times For Common Core


Special Education K-12 Essentials Forum Innovative Approaches to Special Education
Join this free virtual event to explore innovations in the evolving landscape of special education.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Curriculum Webinar
STEM Fusion: Empowering K-12 Education through Interdisciplinary Integration
Join our webinar to learn how integrating STEM with other subjects can revolutionize K-12 education & prepare students for the future.
Content provided by Project Lead The Way
School & District Management Webinar How Pensions Work: Why It Matters for K-12 Education
Panelists explain the fundamentals of teacher pension finances — how they are paid for, what drives their costs, and their impact on K-12 education.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment Should Teachers Be Tough Graders? Here's What They Have to Say
Teachers on social media give their opinions on whether stricter grading helps their students learn more.
2 min read
Close cropped photo of a teacher's grade on an essay graded 'F' in red with the words "See Me"
Assessment The State of Teaching Where Teachers Say the Pressure to Change Grades Comes From
Teachers are more likely to be pressured by parents than school leaders.
4 min read
Conceptul image in blues of a teacher handing out graded papers.
Liz Yap/Education Week and E+
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Assessment Sponsor
Testing Season: Who Are We Really Testing For? Transforming Assessments from Obstacles to Opportunities
As another testing season approaches, a familiar question weighs heavily on our minds: who are these tests serving?
Content provided by Achievement Network
Assessment What the Research Says AI and Other Tech Can Power Better Testing. Can Teachers Use the New Tools?
Assessment experts call for better educator supports for technology use.
3 min read
Illustration of papers and magnifying glass
iStock / Getty Images Plus