Assessment

Cheating Prompts New Watchdog Unit

By The Associated Press — September 10, 2013 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The Texas Education Agency is moving to create a new investigative division after an audit highlighted serious flaws with how the agency monitors the state’s more than 1,000 school districts.

The state auditor’s office confirmed that the TEA didn’t perform a thorough investigation of cheating allegations in the El Paso district. An El Paso Times investigation revealed that district administrators were holding students back, promoting them, or coercing them into leaving school to improve scores on standardized tests. That gave the appearance of improving academic performance, qualifying the district for more federal funds.

The audit, released Aug. 30, also said the state has a flawed system because education officials depend on school districts to police themselves.

TEA Commissioner Michael Williams blamed his predecessor for failing to investigate allegations of cheating in El Paso, the state’s ninth-largest district. Mr. Williams said the leader of a new investigative unit, which was one of the audit’s recommendations, would be hired by the end of the year and must have a strong investigative or prosecutorial background.

The education agency also said in a statement that it had already implemented some of the audit’s recommendations, chiefly the establishment of an office of complaints, investigations, and school accountability.

The TEA put the El Paso district on probation in August 2012 after the newspaper exposed the cheating scandal. Several officials resigned or were fired, and ex-Superintendent Lorenzo Garcia—who got at least $56,000 in bonuses as a result of the improved test scores—is serving three years in prison for fraud.

The scheme devised by Mr. Garcia was meant to prevent academically struggling students, mostly immigrants from neighboring Mexico with low English proficiency, from taking the state’s high-stakes standardized test in the 10th grade. Some were held back a year, others were inexplicably promoted to the 11th grade, and others were told to drop out and find an education elsewhere.

The TEA also installed a conservator, ousted the board of trustees, and installed a new board following the scandal.

A version of this article appeared in the September 11, 2013 edition of Education Week as Cheating Prompts New Watchdog Unit

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Budget & Finance Webinar
Innovative Funding Models: A Deep Dive into Public-Private Partnerships
Discover how innovative funding models drive educational projects forward. Join us for insights into effective PPP implementation.
Content provided by Follett Learning
Budget & Finance Webinar Staffing Schools After ESSER: What School and District Leaders Need to Know
Join our newsroom for insights on investing in critical student support positions as pandemic funds expire.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Achievement Webinar
How can districts build sustainable tutoring models before the money runs out?
District leaders, low on funds, must decide: broad support for all or deep interventions for few? Let's discuss maximizing tutoring resources.
Content provided by Varsity Tutors for Schools

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Sponsor
Testing Season: Who Are We Really Testing For? Transforming Assessments from Obstacles to Opportunities
As another testing season approaches, a familiar question weighs heavily on our minds: who are these tests serving?
Content provided by Achievement Network
Assessment What the Research Says AI and Other Tech Can Power Better Testing. Can Teachers Use the New Tools?
Assessment experts call for better educator supports for technology use.
3 min read
Illustration of papers and magnifying glass
iStock / Getty Images Plus
Assessment What the Research Says What Teachers Should Know About Integrating Formative Assessment With Instruction
Teachers need to understand how tests fit into their larger instructional practice, experts say.
3 min read
Students with raised hands.
E+ / Getty
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Whitepaper
Empowering World Language Learners: A Case Study for Improving Exam Experiences
Explore how NYCDOE's adoption of new World Languages standards for grades 7-12 reshapes assessment.
Content provided by TAO by Open Assessment Technologies