And Congress Said, Let There Be Other Views. Or Did It?

By David J. Hoff — June 12, 2002 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 gives clear mandates to states to begin measuring students’ scientific knowledge by 2008. But what the law means for the science curriculum is still up for debate.

The report accompanying the law includes language declaring that the members who wrote it believe curriculum “should help students to understand the full range of scientific views that exist” on controversial topics, naming biological evolution specifically.

Advocates for alternatives to the theory of evolution say that states should heed the language and include their ideas challenging the theory that originated with the studies of Charles Darwin in the 19th century and have been advanced by modern biologists.

“It’s a strong advisory from Congress to the states, and a lot of people will take it very seriously, and they should,” said Bruce Chapman, the president of the Discovery Institute, a Seattle-based think tank that promotes a theory called “intelligent design.”

But most scientists say that such advisory language has no force of law and urge schools to teach evolution as the explanation for the world’s biological diversity because the theory is almost universally accepted in the scientific community.

“What you teach in a science classroom and what you put in a science curriculum is the scientific consensus,” said Kenneth R. Miller, a professor of biology at Brown University in Providence, R.I., and an author of a widely used high school biology textbook. “Most people realize that this doesn’t have the force of law.”

How to teach evolution has been controversial ever since some schools started banning Darwin’s ideas in the early 20th century.

A Grand Plan?

Now intelligent design’s advocates, who say that Earth is too complex to have evolved without outside intervention, are challenging state standards that list evolution as the best explanation for the diversity of life. Biologists say that the intelligent-design theory has little evidence to back it up.

The latest battleground is Ohio, where a recent debate between Mr. Miller and another scientist on one side and Discovery Institute officials on the other drew more than 1,000 people. (“Debate Over Teaching of Evolution Theory Shifts to Ohio,” March 20, 2002.)

The state will issue new science standards by the end of the year.

On March 15, two Ohio congressmen sent a letter to the leaders of the state’s board of education reminding them of evolution language that appeared in the congressional report describing the intent of the No Child Left Behind Act.

The law reauthorizes federal K-12 programs and requires states to assess 3rd through 8th graders in reading and mathematics, starting in the 2005-06 school year. By the 2007-08 school year, it orders states to test students in science at least once in elementary, middle, and high school.

The bill “clarifies that public school students are entitled to learn that there are differing scientific views on issues such as biological evolution,” wrote Rep. John A. Boehner, the chairman of the House Education and Workforce Committee, and Rep. Steve Chabot, the chairman of the House Constitution Subcommittee. Both are Republicans.

“The conference report does not mandate Ohio do anything,” Heather Valentine, the press secretary for Mr. Boehner’s committee, said in an interview. “This letter is saying what the conference report said.”

Dan Langan, a spokesman for Secretary of Education Rod Paige, said that because the language on evolution is in the conference report, not the body of the law, the Department of Education will have no enforcement role.

Claim Called ‘Bogus’

The law’s report language only muddies the water for state and local policymakers, according to Mr. Miller. Evolution’s opponents are using it to push their agenda, he said, even though it doesn’t include any legal consequences for those who ignore it.

“They say that it’s in the law, which it is not, and that it has the force of law, which it does not,” Mr. Miller said. “Any such claim is bogus.”

But Mr. Chapman, a director of the U.S. Census Bureau during the Reagan administration, said that state and school officials should treat the evolution language as having “the effect of law.”

When policymakers have ignored congressional report language in the past, Mr. Chapman said, Congress later passed a law to force them to do what it had earlier asked them to do.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the June 12, 2002 edition of Education Week as And Congress Said, Let There Be Other Views. Or Did It?


Recruitment & Retention Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: Chronic Teacher Shortage: Where Do We Go From Here?  
Join Peter DeWitt, Michael Fullan, and guests for expert insights into finding solutions for the teacher shortage.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Reading & Literacy Webinar
The Science of Reading: Tools to Build Reading Proficiency
The Science of Reading has taken education by storm. Learn how Dr. Miranda Blount transformed literacy instruction in her state.
Content provided by hand2mind
Student Achievement K-12 Essentials Forum Tutoring Done Right: How to Get the Highest Impact for Learning Recovery
Join us as we highlight and discuss the evidence base for tutoring, best practices, and different ways to provide it at scale.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Curriculum What the Research Says The State of Driver's Education, in 4 Charts
Training requirements vary from state to state.
2 min read
Virtual driving simulation screen.
A screen from a driving simulation.
Jackie Niam/iStock/Getty
Curriculum How Florida's New School Librarian Training Defines Off-Limits Materials
School librarians will soon have to seek parent approval to order new books, and have to avoid books considered "indoctrination."
3 min read
Books line shelves in a high school library Monday, October 1, 2018, in Brownsville, Texas. The Brownsville Independent School District announced having been awarded a multi-million-dollar grant to revitalize libraries to encourage reading by school-aged children to improve literacy skills. It was stated in the meeting that money could also be used to replace aging furniture in some of the district's libraries.
Books line shelves in a high school library in Brownsville, Texas in 2018. In Florida, school librarians will be required to complete training this year that will include how to seek parent approval before they can purchase new books for school libraries and classrooms.
Jason Hoekema/The Brownsville Herald via AP
Curriculum What the Research Says How an Attention-Training Program Can Make Teens Better Drivers
A driving simulation created to tune up attention skills in young drivers with ADD could have wider benefits.
6 min read
Driver Training Simulator
A student uses a driving trainer simulator to sharpen attention skills.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital
Curriculum Q&A You Can Teach About Climate Change in Every Subject and Grade Level. Here's How
Math, foreign language, even art classes offer opportunities to build students' knowledge.
8 min read
Tree growing from a book with education icons floating above, focusing on climate change and curriculum